Vol. 10 · pages 1026–1030
As Member of the Governor-General's Executive Council, 1942–46
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 1026
1005
L. A. DEBATES (CENTRAL) QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
employed on the surface on a permanent basis, and how many
with six days employment in the week; and
(c) how many of these women have come to be employed by
the Welfare Fund mentioned in answer to starred question No.
466, dated the 25th, February, 1946 and how many by Provincial
Governments ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : (a) Exact figures
are not available but approximately 50 per cent of the women
workers withdrawn from underground in coal mines have been
provided with work on surface. Of the remaining 50 per cent
about half have gone to their villages while some of the remainder
are sitting down at collieries because they are refusing contract
work, e.g. coal loading.
(b) All women withdrawn from underground in the State
Railways’ Collieries have been fully employed on surface works
on a permanent basis; 1,060 women employed on six days per
week basis.
(c) No women have yet been employed by the Welfare Fund
but sites are being requisitioned for the establishment of vegetable
gardens and farms in the Jharia and Raniganj Coalfields and after
requisition it is intended that women excluded from underground
works will be employed under Head “Malis” appointed by Welfare
Fund. The number of women which will be employed by the
Provincial Governments is not known at present.
Prof. N. G. Ranga : In regard to the women who are obliged
to stay at home because they do not like to work under the terms
of contract work, what steps do Government propose to take in
order to help these women with some employment without the
mediation of these contractors ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : I cannot give an
off hand answer.
Prof. N. G. Ranga : Why do Government fail to provide
work without the mediation of these contractors ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : This practice has
been going on for a long time in State railway collieries.
Prof. N. G. Ranga : Is it not a fact that the Royal Commission
on Labour reported very strongly against the system of contractors.
Will the Honourable Member devise some system to control the
vagaries of these contractors ? Do not Government take urgent steps
PDF page 1027 (printed page 1006)
1006 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
to devise some other means of providing employment to these
women ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : I hope we shall be
able to deal with that matter.
Mr. Ahmed E. H. Jaffer : Will the Honourable Member
consider the question of submitting this to the Coal Commission
that is about to tour India ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : I do not know
that I can do so. I can bring the matter to the notice of the
Department concerned.
420
* Ban on Contractors Related to Officers of
C.P.W.D.
1143. Shri Satya Narayan Sinha : (a) Will the Honourable
the Labour Member be pleased to state if it is a fact that in the
Central Public Works Department, orders have been issued that
contracts for works should not be awarded to any contractor who
is a close relative of any officer employed in the Department ?
(b) Is it a fact that near relatives include cousins, brother-inlaw, etc. and that officer includes for the purpose of this order
Head Clerks, clerks, draftsmen, surveyors, etc. ?
(c) Why was the order issued, and how many contractors have
been put out of the list as a result of this order ?
(d) Docs any such rule exist in the working of Public Works
Departments in provinces or other countries or in Departments
like Military Engineering Service, Railways, Municipal or District
Boards in India ?
(e) Was the order issued under directions of the Government
of India or by the Chief Engineer, Central P.W.D. on his own
initiative ?
(f) In view of the obvious hardship on persons being penalised
for the sin of being related to others working in the Department,
do Government propose to reconsider the order and withdraw
it ? If not, why not ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : (a) Yes.
* Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. IV of 1946, 21st March 1946, p. 2700.
PDF page 1028
1007
L. A. DEBATES (CENTRAL) QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
(b) The term ‘close relative’ includes also first cousin and
brother-in-law.
The term ‘officer’ does not include for the purpose of the order
non-gazetted staff.
(c) The object was to ensure greater public confidence in the
Central Public Works Department.
Names of 25 contractors have so far been removed from the
approved list of Contractors. Cases of others are under consideration.
(d) Enquiries on this matter have not been made and the
Government of India are not aware whether such rule exists in
other Departments or Countries.
(e) By the direction of the Government of India.
(f) The matter is under the examination of Government.
421
* Report on Family Budget Enquiries
1156. Sri M. Ananthasayanam Ayyangar : (a) Will the
Honourable the Labour Member please state when he intends to
publish reports on the Family Budget Enquiries which started
nearly three years back ?
(b) Will the Honourable Member place before the House the
dates on which the first and the last Family Budget were collected
in every centre where such enquiries were conducted and state
why such an extraordinary period was chosen, for the conduct of
such enquiries ?
(c) Are Government aware that the whole purpose and results
of these enquiries have been most seriously vitiated by leaving
out of account the factor of qualities of items consumed by the
workers from the questionnaires of the Family Budget Enquiries
altogether ?
(d) Will the Honourable Member please state if an Experts
Committee was appointed to ensure uniformity and correct
procedure in such Family Budget Enquiries ? If so, how many
times did it meet ? Is it a fact that sampling techniques and other
important decisions on methods and principles of obtaining and
compiling data applied in these enquiries, were approved by the
said Experts Committee either before or after their application ?
If not, why not ?
* Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. IV of 1946, 21st March 1946, p. 2710.
PDF page 1029 (printed page 1008)
1008 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : (a) Reports on
the Family Budget Enquiries are expected to be completed and
published by the end of September 1946.
(b) A statement containing the information required is placed
on the Table of the House.
As cost of living index numbers constituted an essential basis
for adjustment of dearness allowance, which was urgently required
during the war period and as no reliable data in this respect
were available, a beginning had to be made without waiting for
conditions to return to normal.
(c) The answer is in the negative.
(d) An Expert’s Committee was appointed to discuss methods
of preparing cost of living indices. It met once and laid down
general principles regarding the methods of investigation, which
were generally followed.
Statement showing the dates of starting and closing the
Family Budget Enquiries at the various selected centres
Name of Centre Date of starting the collection of budgets Date on which the work was finished
I. Ajmer (1) …… 15-11-43 15-11-44
II. Bengal (4)—
1. Howrah & Bally 28-7-43 28-7-44
2. Kharagpur 28-7-43 28-7-44
3. Narayanganj 28-7-43 28-7-44
4. Calcutta 1-8-44 317-45
III. Bihar (4)—
1. Monghyr & Jamalpur 9-5-44 31-10-44
2. Dehri-on-Sone 1-11-44 31-1-45
3. Jamshedpur 1-2-45 30-6-45
4. Jharia 1-7-45 25-11-45
IV. Bombay (4)—
1. Bombay 22-1-44 28-2-45
2. Ahmedabad 22-1-44 28-2-45
3. Sholapur 22-1-44 28-2-45
4. Jalgaon 22-1-44 28-2-45
V. C. P. & Berar (2)—
1. Jubbulpore 10-4-44 15-4-45
2. Akola 2nd week of July 1944 15-4-45
VI. Delhi (1) 13-10-43 31-10-44
VII. Punjab (3)—
1. Lahore 1-1-44 30-4-45
2. Ludhiana 1-1-44 30-4-45
3. Sialkot 1-1-44 30-4-45
PDF page 1030
1009
L. A. DEBATES (CENTRAL) QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
Name of Centre Date of starting the collection of budgets Date on which the work was finished
VIII Khewra (2)—
1. Khewra 1st week of April 1944 10-1-45
2. Dandot & A.C.C.I. 15-10-44 10-1-45
IX Sind (1)—
1. Karachi 1-8-44 31-7-45
X Orissa (2)—
1. Cuttack 15-12-44 15-9-45
2. Berhampur 15-1244 15-9-45
XI U.P. (1)—
1. Cawnpore January 1945 Enquiries are proceeding.
XII Assam (3)—
1. Tinsukia April 1944 15-10-45
2. Silchar April 19-14 15-10-45
3. Gauhati April 1944 15-10-45
Prof. N. G. Ranga : Will such enquiries be made at least
in few test cases in regard to agricultural labour?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : I will bear that in
mind although I cannot commit myself.
422
* Compilation of Unweighted Retail Price Index
Number
1155. Sri M. Ananthasayanam Ayyangar : (a) Will the
Honourable the Labour Member be pleased to state the purpose
behind the compilation of unweighted Retail Price Index Number
by groups about industrial cities and town of this country
published in the indian Labour Gazette ?
(b) Were the items and their qualities constituting the groups
for which Retail Price Index Numbers are worked out ever made
known to the public ? If not, why not ?
(c) Will the Honourable Member place before the House total
number of items for each group of every centre for which Retail Price
Index Numbers arc being released by the Labour Department ? In this
connection, will he also slate what the criterion was for fixing upon
* Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. IV of 1946, 21st March 1946, p. 2708.