Vol. 10 · pages 396–400
As Member of the Governor-General's Executive Council, 1942–46
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 396
379
MICA MINES LABOUR WELFARE FUND BILL
The Honourable Dr. B.R. Ambedkar : No, it will be too late.
* * *
The Honourable Dr. B.R. Ambedkar : I did not say that
I would have out Rajputana. I shall be constituting a separate
committee.
Diwan Chaman Lall: I did not hear my Honourable friend
say that he would constitute a separate committee. I heard him
say, “Some other means”. I am glad he says “some separate
committee” now. As for as this measure is concerned, Rajputana
is left out.
The Honourable Dr. B.R. Ambedkar : There welfare
measures will be carried out with the aid of this fund.
Diwan Chaman Lall : Will the money from Madras and
Bihar be taken to help the Rajputana workers ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : We might employ
some other agency, some other organisation in order to carry out
the activities connected with welfare workers. The Fund will pay.
* * *
*The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : I do not propose
to take very long in replying to the criticisms which have been
made against this Bill. I wish to state very briefly my opinion with
regard to the points that have been raised to state very briefly
my opinion with regard to the points that have been raised by
three speakers. I shall first deal with the points raised by my
friend Mr. Tyson. I had made no reference in the speech that I
made in support of my motion with regard to the surplus stock
of mica or the additional cesses that were proposed to be levied
and the report of Mr. Justice Reuben. Sir, I deliberately did
not touch upon these points in my speech, because I knew that
these points would be raised by my friend Mr. Tyson and that
I would have to reply to them. If I did not do so it was largely
because I wanted to save the time of the House.
Now, Sir, the position is this, that although the Labour
Department and the Government of India have decided
to proceed with measures of social welfare on the basis of
the report made by Prof. Adarkar, the decision was taken
by the Labour Department long before the report of Prof.
Adarkar was made. I am glad to say that the decision taken
*Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. V-No. 7, 9th April 1946, pp. 3757-59.
PDF page 397 (printed page 380)
380 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
by the Labour Department has been fully supported by
Mr. Justice Reuben in his report on the Mica industry.
In fact he himself has suggested that there should be a
general levy on the mica produced or exported and that about
5/12 of the receipts under the general cess should be set apart for
labour welfare in the mica mines. Therefore in proceeding with
this measure we are in no sense departing from the report made
by Mr. Reuben. All that we have done is that instead of having
a single cess as suggested by Mr. Reuben to be distributed and
allocated for different purposes we have thought it necessary to
have a separate fund for welfare and another fund for certain
administrative measures that may be necessary for the industry
as such. The reason for making this decision is obviously due to
the fact that the welfare fund will have to be administered by
a separate agency, while the fund for other purposes will have
to be administered by a separate agency. There my Honourable
friend Mr. Tyson will see that the decision of the Government
of India is in full accord with the report of Mr. Reuben.
With regard to, the additional cess we have, as my Honourable
friend will see, fixed the cess in the initial stage at a very low
figure. The figure suggested in the Reuben report is 6 per cent,
ad valorem.....
Mr. Geoffrey W. Tyson : Labour or General ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : General. This is
a matter which will have to be examined at a later stage as to
exactly what should be the pitch of the cess in order that the
cess may produce sufficient revenue which would be adequate
both for welfare and other purposes.
Diwan Chaman Lall : How much does my Honourable
friend expect ?
The Honourable Dr. B.R. Ambedkar : Wait, I will come to
that a little later. With regard to the question of surplus stock
I would like to inform the House that the Government of India
has been in negotiation with His Majesty’s Government for a
long time over the question of the disposal of surplus stocks of
mica which have been held by His Majesty’s Government as well
as by the United States. I am glad to say that we have come to
an agreement whereby no sort of harm will be done to the mica
industry by the disposal of the surplus stock. The negotiation
has reached the final stage and in a few days time a press note
will be issued informing the industry and the general public
PDF page 398
381
MICA MINES LABOUR WELFARE FUND BILL
of the arrangement which has been arrived at between His
Majesty’s Government and the Government of India. I might
say that this arrangement has the fullest support of the mica
industry itself.
With regard to this measure I would like also to inform the
House that this measure has been undertaken with the fullest
consent of the industry itself. This question was first broached
by me at a conference which was held at Kodarma on 29th
April 1944, at which I presided and the representatives of the
mica industry were also present, and I was glad to find that the
industry as a whole responded to my suggestion for having a
welfare fund. The matter was again taken up on 9th November
1945, at a conference held at Dhanbad under the chairmanship of
the Coal Mines Welfare Commissioner. There again, the producers
of mica accepted the suggestion. Lastly, a third conference
was held on 19th December, 1945, also at Dhanbad under the
chairmanship of the Secretary of the Labour Department, where
a final agreement was reached between the Government and the
Mica mineowners. I would also like to state that our proposal to
levy a cess on the industry does not seem to have discouraged
the industries from further exploiting the field of mica production
and I find that during the last few months, there have been to
my knowledge at any rate, three big flatations of new companies
which have entered into the field of mica. I find, for instance,
a new flatation under the name of Micantic and Mica Products
Co., Ltd., from Madras with an authorised capital of Rs. 5 lakhs.
Another is called the Saraswati Mica Industries Limited, from
Calcutta with an authorised capital of Rs. 5 lakhs and I know
as a matter of fact that the Christian Mining Industries Ltd.,
have also applied for capital issues for mica mining and for the
establishment of a micanite factory. These circumstances would
show that the cess has not been viewed by the industries in any
tragic manner and I think that they believe that it would be
possible for the industry to bear the burden of this welfare cess.
Coming to the points made by my friend Diwan Chaman
Lall, I must apologise for not supplying him with a copy of the
report which he had asked for at some early stage. I must say
that I altogether forgot about it. But I do not think that he has
in any way lost in dealing with the matter in the way in which
he has dealt with it. All that probably he would have done if he
had the report is that he would have made a speech of double
the length of what he did.
PDF page 399 (printed page 382)
382 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
With regard to the question that he put to me as to how much
revenue the cess will produce, I hestitate to give the house any
definite figure and the reason is quite obvious. The production
of mica has not been at a very steady figure. For instance, I
have figures here from 1934 to 1944. In 1934, the value of mica
produced was Rs. 6,30,525, while in 1944, it was 2,73,01,458
and there have been various figures for the different years in
the intervening period. It is no use, therefore, for me to give the
House any particular figure. We must allow sometime for the
industry to stabilise itself in the post-war period. But taking the
figure for 1944, I calculate that the cess would be somewhere
in the neighbourhood of Rs. five lakhs. I quite appreciate that
that is not a very large sum. Personally, if I may say so, what I
am fighting for is the establishment of a principle. If later on it
was found that the fund was not sufficient, it would be still open
for any member of the Government who would be in charge of
this to come forward and increase the cess and thereby augment
the amount and carry on the measures of social welfare which
otherwise would not be possible.
With regard to the Mica Purchase Mission, the point to which
my friend made reference, is a matter not relevant to the Bill
which we are considering and I do not therefore propose to enter
into the questions arising out of the Mica Purchase Mission’s
activities. But I can tell my friend that so far as I know anything
about it, the industrialists engaged in the production of mica in
this country have not only not had any harm done to them but
I am quite satisfied that they have made more than ordinary
profits.
My friend, Diwan Chaman Lal, spent a great length of his
speech in discussing the lax administration of the Mines Act.
He referred to the employment of children and of other matters
relating also to employment of women. As I said, I am quite
aware of this fact, and the Labour Department has on the anvil
legislation to remove all the defects which have been reported
upon by Mr. Adarkar in the course of his Report dealing with
the workers in mica mines. And if there was time available to
Government, it would have been possible even in this session,
to bring forth a Bill to remove those evils. But I have no doubt
that that will be done without delay.
Coming to the points reaised by my friend, Mr. Ram Narayan Singh,
I know he made a great point, that this was a very delayed measure.
PDF page 400
383
MICA MINES LABOUR WELFARE FUND BILL
He said that the mica industry was there, the evils have been
there, Government has been here and nothing was done. If I may
tell him, he only forgot to mention one tiling, that lie also was
there, and for a long number of years. If he had taken the earliest
opportunity to move in this matter to energize and organize the
conscience of the Government and of the industrialists, I have
no doubt that the delay of which he has complained would never
have occurred. But I hope he will agree that it is better late
than never.
With regard to the question of administration of the Fund,
I think the point that he made was that the administration
should be left to the Provincial Governments. I am sorry to say
that I cannot accept that principle. This legislation is a Central
legislation. It is a legislation for which the Central Government
is responsible. The Fund is raised by the Central law. The Fund
is raised for a particular and specific purpose. Having regard
to these circumstances, it seems to me unjustifiable on the
part of the Government of India to allot the whole of this sum
to the Provincial Governments, where they might be merged
in the general revenues of the Province and spent, I suppose,
in accordance with the wishes—I do not say whims of the
Provincial Government. I am of opinion, since the responsibility
for the Fund is a Central responsibility, since the Fund is for a
specific purpose, and since it would be a sort of a trust which
the Government of India would be administering, it is in every
way desirable—not only desirable but necessary—that the Central
Government from beginning to end should keep its hand on the
administration of this Fund. While this is so, I should like to tell
my Honourable friend that he has probably not studied the way
in which , the Coal Mines Labour Welfare Fund is administered.
I would therefore like to tell him some details about it because
the administration of the Coal Mines Welfare Fund would be the
model—indeed not only the model but the pattern—on which the
administration of this Fund will be carried on. In the matter of
the Coal Mines Welfare Fund, the administration is vested in a
Commissioner who is generally a provincial officer, an officer lent
by the Provincial Government. If I may tell him, the person who
is now administering the Coal Mines Welfare Fund is an officer
lent by the Bihar Government, and he should rest assure that
even in the matter of the administration of the Mica Fund we
shall be applying to the Bihar Government to lend us an officer