Vol. 10 · pages 541–545
As Member of the Governor-General's Executive Council, 1942–46
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 541
No text on this page (it may be blank, a title page or an image).
PDF page 542
SECTION III
STATEMENTS
1
A Critique of the Proposals of
the Cabinet Mission for
Indian Constitutional Changes
in so far as they affect
the Scheduled Castes
(Untouchables)
by
B.R. AMBEDKAR
PDF page 543
No text on this page (it may be blank, a title page or an image).
PDF page 544
* Does the Indian National Congress
Represent the Scheduled Castes
(Untouchables) of India ?
The Cabinet Mission sent out to India by the Labour
Government early this year to resolve the political deadlock
in India set out a Scheme for the framing of the constitution
by a Constituent Assembly. This Constituent Assembly is to
be composed of representatives chosen by the members of the
Provincial Legislatures by a single transferable vote. For the
purposes of the composition of the Constituent Assembly the
Cabinet Mission’s Scheme has divided the members of the
provincial legislatures into three categories (1) Muslems, (2) Sikhs
and (3) General, each with a fixed quota of seats. Each category
has a separate electorate whereby the Muslem representatives
of the Constituent Assembly will be elected by the Muslem
members of the Provincial Legislature, the Sikhs by the Sikh
members and the General by all the rest. The ‘general’ includes
(1) Hindus, (2) Scheduled Castes, (3) Indian Christians, and (4)
Anglo-Indians.
2. The Scheduled Castes of India were greatly surprised to
find that they were lumped together with the Hindus. It has
been declared time and again by His Majesty’s Government that
His Majesty’s Government recognizes that the Scheduled Castes
are separate element in the national life of India and that His
Majesty’s Government will not impose any constitution to which
the Scheduled Castes are not a willing party. The question is
asked why the Cabinet Mission recognized the Muslems and the
Sikhs as separate elements and why they refused to give the
Scheduled Castes the same status ?
In the debate that took place in Parliament on the 18th
of July, on the proposals of the Cabinet Mission, Sir Stafford
Cripps, Mr. Alexander and Lord Pethick-Lawrence tried to defend
themselves against this criticism, Their argument was two-fold :—
(1) That in the elections to the Provincial Legislature which took
* Source : Printed booklet. —Ed.
PDF page 545 (printed page 524)
524 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
place in February last the seats reserved for the Scheduled
Castes were captured by the Congress and that this shows
that the Scheduled Castes were with the Congress and
trusted their destiny to the Congress i.e. the Hindus and
that there was no ground for separating them.
(2) That there is to be an Advisory Committee on the minorities
in which the Scheduled Castes will be represented and will
have a voice in the framing of the safeguards necessary
for them.
The second defence is worse than useless. The reasons are
obvious. The status and powers of the Advisory Committee
are not defined. The quantum of representation of the
Scheduled Castes is not prescribed. The decisions of the
Advisory Committee are left to be carried by a bare majority.
Lastly the Advisory Committee cannot be anything else
than a mere reflection of the Constituent Assembly. The
representatives of the Scheduled Castes in the Constituent
Assembly all belong to the Congress Party and they do not
represent the Scheduled Castes. They are therefore subject
to the Mandate of the Congress Party. Those of them who
will be put in the Advisory Committee will be subject to the
same Party Mandate. They cannot put forth the real point
of view of the Scheduled Castes either in the Constituent
Assembly or on the Advisory Committee.
The principal line of defence used by the members of the
Cabinet Mission in justification of their failure to give the
Scheduled Castes separate and independent representation
is that the Congress won the Scheduled Caste seats in the
last election. Even this line of defence cannot stand. It is
true that in the final election the Congress did capture the
Scheduled Caste seats. But the reply is that this election
results should not have been taken as the test for various
reasons.
Firstly the parties such as the Scheduled Castes who had
co-operated with the British Government were at a discount
with the people on that very account.
Secondly the trial of the Indian National Army men which
synchronized with the election placed the Congress at an advantage