Vol. 10 · pages 581–585
As Member of the Governor-General's Executive Council, 1942–46
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 581 (printed page 560)
560 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
shall be appointed under him an Indian to be trained so that
when the European vacates the Indian would be able to take
charge of the department.
Pandit Lakshmi Kanta Maitra : The Honourable Member
said just now that Mr. Cowen Started work at the end of May
1942, and that in regard to these non-ferrous metals, zinc and
lead the appointment of British officials was inevitable. When
did it occur to the Government of India to have these mines
explored ? Was it after the fall of Burma, so as to provide for
these gentlemen who have been thrown out of employment ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : I cannot give an
answer to that question.
Pandit Lakshmi Kanta Maitra : When did the Government
first take it into their head to have these mines worked in India ?
What have they been doing all this time ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : Probably quite
spontane ously without reference to anything external.
Sardar Sant Singh : May I ask whether the need for working
these mines was felt as a necessity to provide for the war effort,
or was it to provide these evacuees from Burma with some jobs ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : Certainly not; the
supplies from Burma having ceased it was necessary for the
Government of India to exploit their own resources.
Mr. K. C. Neogy : With reference to clause (d) of the question,
my Honourable friend stated that petroleum was not included
among the minerals at the present moment. Has petroleum been
excluded from the programme as a matter of discretion with the
department or because the Government has been committed to
some other agency for the development of petroleum in India ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : Not at all. My answer
was that for the present the programme docs not include it; it
does not mean that it is excluded from the programme altogether.
Mr. K. C. Neogy : Will the Honourable Member be surprised
I were to tell him that Dr. Fox made a statement on the 6th
of July, a portion of which I referred to yesterday, somewhat to
that effect ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : I would like to say
this to my Honourable friend, that Dr. Fox does not decide the
policy of the Government of India.
PDF page 582
561
L. A. DEBATES (CENTRAL) QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
Mr. K. C. Neogy : But Dr. Fox may at least be expected to
be truthful. Anyway, may I ask another very short question? My
Honourable friend stated that the Udaipur Durbar had to be
persuaded to cancel the lease in respect of lead and zinc mines
in that State, which had already been granted to a private party.
Before getting the Udaipur Durbar obligingly to cancel this lease,
was any attempt made by the Government to find out whether
an agreement could not be arrived at with that private party
for the purpose of enabling whatever activities the department
wanted to carry on to be carried on ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : I must have notice
of that question.
3
* “Bevin Boys ” Returned to India and
their Employment
23. Mr. Govind V. Deshmukh : Will the Honourable Member
for Labour please state how many “ Bevin boys ” have returned
to India and if all of them have got employment ? If not, what
are the reasons for their unemployment? Are any of them taking
any part in Trade Unions?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : 149 Bevin boys
have returned to India of whom 26 arrived only on the 5th
September and are now being tested by an Examining Board. Of
the remaining 123, 105 have been placed in employment with an
average increase of salary of 145 per cent. Of the balance of 18,
nine boys who arrived at the end of July have been allotted to
posts and will be appointed very shortly; two who do not wish
to take up factory work are being considered for Emergency
Commissions—one in the Indian Army and one in the Indian Air
Force ; three have refused the posts offered to them and efforts
are now being made to find them other appointments ; one is
being returned to his original employment on increased pay; one is
undergoing tests with a view to appointment as Welder Instructor
* Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. III of 1942, 15th September 1942,
pp. 112-113.
PDF page 583 (printed page 562)
562 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
at a training centre ; one has been earmarked for a post but
cannot at present be traced; and the last man was returned from
England for misconduct without completing his training.
It is too early yet to say whether any of the returned trainees
are taking part in Trade Union Affairs.
Mr. Govind V. Deshmukh : May I know if their unemployment
is not due to the fact that they are taking part in Trade Union
movements ?
The Honourable Dr. B.R. Ambedkar : I do not think so.
I do not see any evidence of unemployment among the trainees.
Mr. Govind V. Deshmukh : My question was “ if all the
‘Bcvin boys’ have got employment ” and the answer was that all
the ‘Bevin boys’ who have returned are not employed, that some
are being tested, that some are employed that some are sent
back to their old jobs. I want to put this question whether their
unemployment is in any way due to the fact that they are taking
interest in trade union activities.
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: I am sure it is not.
Mr. Govind V. Deshmukh : What sort of misconduct was
reported against one of the ‘Bevin boys ’ ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: I have not got the
information at present. I want notice.
Mr. Govind V. Deshmukh : Has it got anything to do with
his labour activities ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : I would not like to
spoil the chances of this young man, did not the Government think
it advisable to make enquiries about what that misconduct was ?
Mr. Govind V. Deshmukh : When this case of misconduct was
reported against this young man, did not the Government think
it advisable to make enquiries about what that misconduct was ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : I have no doubt
that Government have got the information about the sort of
misconduct he was found guilty of. I have not got the fact with
me at present. I want notice.
Dr. Sir Zkuiddin Ahmad : May I know whether the ‘Bevin
boys’ come from the labouring classes ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: The Department is
examining that aspect of the case.
PDF page 584
563
L. A. DEBATES (CENTRAL) QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
Mr. Govind V. Deshmukh : In view of the fact that the ‘
Bevin boys ’ return to India after obtaining proper training in
England, where is the necessity for testing them again ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R . Ambedkar: Most of the
employers would not accept the word of the Government of India
that they were trained, and the employer would like to satisfy
himself that the man whom he is employing is properly trained.
We cannot prohibit the employer from doing so.
4
* Depreciation in Labour Wages
27. Mr. Amarendra Nath Chattopadhyaya: (a) Will the
Honourable Member for Labour be pleased to state if he has
ascertained the exact depreciation in wages in proportion to
the increase in value of food-stuff and textile commodities and
general cost of living ? If so, what is the ratio ?
(b) Is it not a fact that the dearncss allowance and wartime
bonuses granted to Railway workers is not sufficient to make
up for the proportional fall or depreciation in wages ?
(c) If the answer to part (b) be in the affirmative, does the
Honourable Member propose to reconsider the matter of wages of
labour on the Railways and increase their wages to an amount
which would be sufficient?
(d) Do Government propose, during the war period, to set up
food and cloth stores for supplying Railway labour with these
commodities at prices commensurate with their present income
and if it proves satisfactory to continue the arrangement as a
permanent measure ?
(e) Will the Honourable Member be pleased to make a
comparative statement of wages paid to the Railway labour
in Government controlled Railways, in private Railways (i.e.
Company-managed and private State Railways) and in textile
mills, jute mills and the iron and steel factories in India, and
also their hours of work in a week ?
* Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. III of 1942, 15th September 1942,
pp. 115-17.
PDF page 585 (printed page 564)
564 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : (a) The costs of
living have not risen at the same rates throughout India ; there
are reliable cost of living indices only for a few large towns ; the
rates of wages even at one centre differ considerably for different
classes of employees, and the movements in the rates of wages
have been uneven at the same place and as between different
places. In view of these factors, it is not possible to give a reply
to the question as put by the Honourable Member. If he desires
information regarding any specific class of employees at a place
where there is a reliable cost of living index, I shall attempt to
furnish it.
(b) No. I believe that the dearness allowance meets full the
increased cost of living in the lower grades though to a diminishing
extent in the higher grades.
(c) Does not arise; but I would add that recently the dearness
allowance was enhanced by a considerable extent, in negotiation
with the All India Railwaymen’s Federation and there is no
justification for a further revision at present.
(d) Grain shops have been and are being opened by a number
of railways when the administration considered it necessary to
do so. Commodities supplied in these shops are sold at prices
not exceeding the control prices fixed by Provincial governments.
It is proposed to run these shops during the war as long as the
necessity for them exists. No cloth shops have yet been opened
on the Railways.
(e) There is no known basis for making such a wide comparison;
each factory employs specialised labour and comparison is difficult.
Mr. Muhammad Nauman : May I know from the Honourable
Member whether it is the contention of government that there
has been no rise in price since 1939 ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : That is not the
contention of the Government. All that the Government say is
that there is no uniformity in rise.
Mr. Muhammad Nauman : There is some uniformity taking
the minimum. Are the Government not prepared to accept the
minimum rise in all commodities, which is above 50 per cent ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : I am prepared to
say that there is rise, but I cannot say that the percentage is
as high as the Honourable Member suggests.