Vol. 10 · pages 61–65
As Member of the Governor-General's Executive Council, 1942–46
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 61
8
* The Paper Control Order
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar (Labour Member):
I am indeed very glad that the Honourable Mr. Bajoria brought
forward this adjournment motion which enables Government
to place before the House the facts with regard to the paper
situation in this country. Sir, in the speeches that have been
delivered in this House, some very harsh things have been said
about Government. The Government is accused of being callous,
of being selfish, of being hard-hearted, of having no consideration
for the educational institutions of this country. I merely propose
to place before the House the facts as they arc, the reasons
which led the Government to issue this order, the steps that the
Government has taken in order to case the situation immediately
and for the future.
Sir, I would like to begin by pointing out to the House that
there appears to be a certain misunderstanding about the nature
of the order which has been issued by the Government. Member
after member has risen in this House to suggest that the order
passed by the Government in fact means that the Government
claims 90 per cent of the paper production for itself. I would like
to tell the House that that is a complete misunderstanding. The
order passed by the Controller of Paper is not a requisition order.
It is an order which in turn says that the manufacturers of paper
shall be bound to hand over to Government 90 per cent of the
paper that they produce. The order is what I may call a freezing
order, and I want to tell the House that that difference that I
am making is a real difference. It is not a difference without
distinction, because the order, as it stands, all that it tells the
* Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. I, 11th February 1943, pp. 128-31.
PDF page 62 (printed page 45)
45THE PAPER CONTROL ORDER
paper-makers is that they shall not sell more than 10 per cent
of their production to the public. It does not in turn say that
they shall deliver 90 per cent of the paper to Government. That
I think is a very fundamental and a very real distinction which
the House should bear in mind.
Pandit Lakshmi Kanta Maitra (Presidency Division: NonMuhammadan Rural): What is the difference in effect ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : The Government
may release more than 10 per cent.
Bapur Baijnath Bajoria : How ?
Dr. P. N. Banerjea : When wisdom dawned on Government ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : It is the order as
it stands. I am not giving the interpretation of the order. I am
explaining the terms in the nature of the Order.
(There was an interruption, several Members speaking.)
Mr. President (The Honourable Sir Abdur Rahim) : Order,
order.
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : The second point
which I want the House to bear in mind is that the order is
served on the paper mills. It is not served on the stockists,
who have a large number of stocks of paper already in their
godowns. Secondly, it is still possible for the public to satisfy
its requirements by getting such paper as is still available in
the stocks which have been stored and hoarded by stockists
before the order was passed. The third thing which I wish to
remind the House about this order is this : that it is possible
under the order, as it is framed, for the Controller of Paper to
permit the mills to sell more than 10 per cent. There is no bar,
there is no impediment, no obstacle placed if the Controller of
Paper, notwithstanding the order that has been passed on the
5th November, finds that it is possible for him to release for
public consumption more than 10 per cent of the paper. It is
still open to him to do so. Having explained to the House what
is actually involved in the order issued by the Government, I
would like to take the House and acquaint it with the immediate
circumstances which compelled Government to pass this order.
Briefly, the facts are these. In the first six months,
viz., from April to September, our demand for paper, which
is put forth by the Central Stationery Office, amounted
to 34,000 tons. It was found that the mills had already
delivered about 16,000 tons of paper to Government on
PDF page 63 (printed page 46)
46 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
behalf of the Central Stationery Office. The House will bear in
mind that we had entered into a contract with the paper mills
for supplying us 25,900 tons. If the House will enter into a little
arithmetic, it will be found that as a result of our calculations
for the first six months it was found that we had only 9,000
tons to get under our contract from the paper mills and had to
run six months yet. Consequently, what the Government did
was this. The Government revised its estimate in the light of
the circumstances that had been disclosed during the previous
six months. The second thing that the Government did was to
consolidate the method of requisitioning paper, and here I would
like to tell the House that before the order was passed there
were two methods by which demands for paper on behalf of
Government were put forth. One way was the Central Stationery
Office demand, which was a demand on behalf of the Central
Government, and the provinces of Bengal, Orissa, Assam, and
the North-West Frontier Province and the Central Provinces. The
other was the non-Central Stationery office demand, made on
behalf of what are technically called the Non-C.S.O. provinces,
i.e. the provinces, who presented their demands independently
of the Central Stationery Office, plus Indian States, Security
Printing, Supply Department, and non-State Railways. It was
found that these two independent methods of requisitioning paper
for Government created a great deal of difficulty in arriving
at an accurate estimate of the total demand for paper, and
consequently the first step that was taken was to consolidate
these two channels of demand into one single channel, and the
whole matter is now concentrated in the hands of the Central
Stationery Office.
As I told the House previously, when the situation was found
to have grown somewhat perilous on account of the excessive use
of paper, and practically overdrawing over the contract amount,
we revised the estimates and centralised the demands, and the
position at the end of October worked out to these figures :
Tons
The Central Stationery Office demand for the next six months, i.e. from
October 10 March 1943 was fixed at ... ... 32,000
The Non-Central Stationery Office demand was fixed at ... ... 9,500
Together the total came to ... 41,500
PDF page 64 (printed page 47)
47THE PAPER CONTROL ORDER
On the basis of the production of the mills during that year,
it was calculated that the mills would produce 47,575 tons during
October and March. It will be found that the Government demand
of 41,500 tons represented 87 per cent of the mills production
during the six months. Roughly it was 90 per cent, and that is
the reason why the order maintained 90 per cent as the figure.
Now, the House will understand why it became necessary in
November to issue this order. I want to tell the House the
measures that the Government has taken in order to increase
production of paper.
Of course, as the House will realise, it is not possible for
Government to help the paper mills in the importation of
additional machinery in order to enable them to increase their
production. The difficulty of shipping is quite well known and
it is quite beyond the powers of the Government to do anything
in the matter. Consequently we have to work out whatever we
can to increase the production of paper within the means which
are available to us; and I would like to draw the attention of
the House to three things which the Government has done and
which could be usefully referred to as measures taken to increase
production. The Government has appointed a paper production
officer, whose duty it is to find out ways and means by which
production of paper could be increased
An Honourable Member : Who is this gentleman ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : Mr. Bhargava.
Secondly, the Government has cut out non-essential luxury
varieties of paper and has restricted Government requirements
to only a few easily manufactured standard qualities. Thirdly, the
Government has been dealing with each mill separately to find
out what sort of paper each particular mill, having regard to its
machinery and its equipment, can produce to the largest extent.
It is estimated at present that as a result of the measures taken
to increase production, the increase would be about 12,000 tons.
The next thing that the Government has done in order
to ease the situation is to impose cuts, arbitrary cuts, on the
demands of the various departments made for paper. These cuts
are as follows : provincial and state requirements have been cut
down arbitrarily by 10 per cent, which gives a saving of 950
tons. Secondly, so far as the Central Government is concerned,
the budgets for paper presented by the various departments
which spend paper—their original estimates have been
PDF page 65 (printed page 48)
48 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
revised and cut down to an appreciable extent. To illustrate
what the Government has done in the matter of revising these
estimates, I would place before the House the following figures.
The original estimate of the civil departments was 11,400 tons
and it has been cut down to 4,600 tons during the six months.
The original estimate of the Defence Department was 15,000
tons and it has been cut down to 10,000 tons. The Eastern
Group Supply Council’s original estimate was 9,400 tons and
that has been cut down to 7,900 tons. The Supply Department’s
requirement of 3,100 tons has been increased to 4,500 tons—
that is commercial paper used for industry. As the House will
notice, the original estimates of the departments to which I have
referred came to 39,100 tons, while the revised estimates come
to 27,600 tons. The House will be pleased to notice that, as I
have already indicated, by the cut imposed on the provincial and
Indian State requirements a saving has been effected of 950 tons.
And to that 11,900 tons obtained by revising the estimates of
the different departments and the total comes to 12,850 tons.
Now, compare this in the light of the paper that is consumed
in India. There are no exact figures nor is it possible to obtain
any exact figures ; but such figures as Government have shown
that the annual consumption of paper in India was about one
lakh of tons ; for six months it comes to 50,000 tons and as the
House will remember, ten per cent of that is already left to the
public under the orders issued by the Controller of Printing.
That gives the public 5,000 tons. Add to that the 12,850 tons
which have been saved now or will be saved by the reduction I
have referred to, the total paper which can be released is 17,850
tons which as the House will see comes to nearly 33 per cent of
what the public consume during peace time ……..
Mr. President (The Honourable Sir Abdur Rahim) : The
Honourable Member’s time is up; there is no option.
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : I was going to
refer next to the measures that we have taken in order to avoid
waste. As my time is up I do not wish to go into those details.
I can send them to the press, if that is the view of the House.
The next thing that I would refer the Honourable House to is what
we propose to do for the next year. For the next year the estimate is
about 70,000 tons ; in that what we have done is this ; we have fixed
the quota of every department which needs paper. For instance, the