Vol. 10 · pages 611–615
As Member of the Governor-General's Executive Council, 1942–46
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 611 (printed page 590)
590 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
23
* Plan for Providing Against Mass—
Unemployment of Indian Labour
@ 103. Mr. Govind V. Deshmukh : Will the Honourable
Member for Labour please state if he has planned any scheme to
provide against mass unemployment of Indian Labour so that it
may enjoy freedom from want of necessaries of life ? If so, what ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : No formal scheme
to provide against mass unemployment has been planned.
In War time the scope for employment has increased
enormously. As regards post-war conditions, the Reconstruction
Committee appointed in the Commerce Department will devote
attention to them.
24
† Monopoly of Export of Mica to the Joint Mica
Mission and Metal Reserve Company of the
United States of America
105. Babu Baijnath Bajoria : (a) Will the Honourable the
Labour Member please state if it is a fact that when the Joint
Mica Mission assumed control of export of Mica from this country,
they gave an undertaking to the Government of India that they
would purchase the entire production of Indian Mica ?
(b) If the answer to the part (a) be in the affirmative, what
steps are Government taking for the implementing of this
undertaking ?
(c) Is the Honourable Member aware that the Joint Mica
Mission is purchasing only scheduled qualities of Mica and
refuses to purchase other qualities, e.g. lower grade splittings and
Block Mica, and many a time refuses to purchase even certain
scheduled qualities, which has resulted in large stocks of these
qualities remaining unsold in the hands of Indian merchants ?
* Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. I of 1943, 16th February 1943, p. 281.
@ Answer to this question laid on the table, the questioner being absent.
† Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. I of 1943, 16th February 1943, pp.
282-83.
PDF page 612
591
L. A. DEBATES (CENTRAL) QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
(d) What steps are Government taking so that the industry
may be able to dispose of its stocks of qualities not purchased
by the Joint Mica Mission ?
(e) Are Government prepared to permit the export of Mica by
private firms to the United States of America and other Allied
countries ? If not, why not ?
(f) Are Government aware that since the Joint Mica Mission
is controlling the purchase and export of Mica, the production
of loose Mica splittings has considerably decreased and several
thousands of workers have been thrown out of employment due
to the closing of numerous factories and home splitting centres ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : (a) The Joint Mica
Mission has not assumed control of export of mica from this
country. It has, however, undertaken to purchase all mica offered
to it which is of merchantable quality and which is trimmed and
graded to the usual recognised trade standards.
(b) Government have no reason to suppose that the Mission
is not implementing the undertaking.
(c) The Mission is only purchasing scheduled qualities of mica ;
no other qualities are merchantable among the United Nations.
Such qualities can however be exported to neutral countries
provided they do not conflict with any general orders issued by
Government. The Mission never refuses to purchase schdeuled
qualities of mica provided they arc up to the Mission’s standards.
The Government of India are not aware that there arc any large
stocks of scheduled qualities of mica remaining unsold.
(d) Qualities of mica not purchased by the Joint Mica Mission
are not merchantable in the United Nations. Government are
accordingly not taking steps to assist the industry to dispose
of such stocks. In the unlikely event of such stocks being
merchantable in neutral countries, Government have no objection
to the issue of licences for the export of such stocks provided they
do not conflict with any general orders issued by Government.
(e) Export of mica by private firms is not prohibited.
The United Nations will however not import mica by
private firms but will only import mica purchased by
the Joint Mica Mission. The United Nations require all
merchantable mica which the mica industry in India can
PDF page 613 (printed page 592)
592 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
produce. The sale of mica to the United Nations has been
canalised through the Joint Mica Mission because the United
Nations including the Government of India consider that a single
purchasing agency buying on the spot provides the quickest and
easiest means of providing mica in the very large quantities
now required by the United Nations.
(f) The United Nations already have considerable stocks
of mica splittings and their principal requirements are now
of block mica. Nevertheless the Mission continues to buy all
mica which comes split from the mines. They will not however
buy mica which is split from old dumps and such mica is no
longer merchantable among the United Nations. Such mica can
however be sold in neutral countries provided such sale does
not conflict with any general orders issued by Government.
Government are not aware that any factories have been closed,
although possibly a number of home splitting centres may have
been closed.
Babu Baijnath Bajoria : As regards part (a), again I repeat
the question that there is a demand for Mica of other varieties
in America and that is not being allowed to be exported.
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: I am not aware
of that.
Babu Baijnath Bajoria : Will you make inquiries ? If there
is a demand in the U.S.A. of the qualities which this Mission
does not buy then private firms should be allowed to export
those qualities to America.
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: I will make
inquiries.
25
* Fixation of Prices of Grades of Mica by the
Joint Mica Mission
106. Babu Baijnath Bajoria : (a) Is the Honourable the
Labour Member aware that the Joint Mica Mission fixes the
prices of the various grades of Mica without any consultation
with the representatives of the industry ?
* Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. I of 1943, 16th February 1943, p. 283.
PDF page 614
593
L. A. DEBATES (CENTRAL) QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
(b) Is the Honourable Member aware that the Joint Mica
Mission raised the standards considerably, compared to those of
the Metal Reserve Company who bought through the Director,
Geological Survey of India ?
(c) Arc Government aware that the Joint Mica Mission has
reduced its purchasing prices by 10 per cent to 30 per cent from
the ruling prices in the market and the factories are compelled
to sell their products at their rates for want of any other outlet ?
(d) Is it a fact that the Government of India accepted the
reduction in prices as mentioned in part (c) above ?
(c) Arc Government prepared to appoint an advisory committee
consisting of representatives of mine-owners and factory-owners
to advise the Joint Mica Mission on the question of fixation of
prices of different qualities ? If not, why not ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : (a) Before fixing
the prices of various grades of mica, the Joint Mica Mission have
invariably consulted the mica industry, including representatives
of individual firms both in Bihar and Madras.
(b) The Joint Mica Mission has not raised the standards
considerably. It has however raised the standards slightly in
certain cases although no change has been made in splittings
and films. Wherever the standard has been raised the price has
been raised in proportion. Taking pre-Mission standard and price
as 100, the Mission standard where it has been raised is 105
and the Mission price 110. The range of standards required by
the Metals Reserve Company when buying through the Director
of the Geological Survey of India was small compared with the
very wide range of scheduled standards being dealt with by the
Mission.
(c) The Joint Mica Mission has not reduced its purchasing
prices by 10 per cent to 30 per cent.
(d) Does not arise.
(e) No. The prices offered by the Mission were fixed after
consultation with the representatives of the mica industry and
with the approval of the Government of India. They are in the
opinion of the Government of India fair prices and the Government
of India see no justification for the appointment of an Advisory
Committee.
PDF page 615 (printed page 594)
594 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
Babu Baijnath Bajoria : What objection can the
Government have to appoint an advisory committee consisting of
representatives of mincowners and factories ? That will strengthen
their hands and that of the Mica Mission for purchasing the
requirements of Mica.
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : The answer as
stated in part (e) is that the Mica Mission does fix the price
after consultation with the representatives of the Mica industry.
Babu Baijnath Bajoria : I do not think that is correct.
26
* Irregularities in Payment of Wages
to Railway Staff
109. Mr. Lalchand Navalrai : (a) Will the Honourable the
Labour Member be pleased to state when the Payment of Wages
Act, IV of 1936, was made applicable to the Railways in India,
(b) Is it a fact that several irregularities in the payment to
staff have been noticed by the Labour Inspectors ?
(c) Is it a fact that the Conciliation Officer (Railways) and
the Supervisor of Railway Labour, who is the Inspector under
the Act, generally tries to report these irregularities to the
administrations concerned for relief, if any could be given ?
(d) Is it not a fact that in several cases of late payments,
etc., relief can be given lo the affected employees when once the
provisions of the Payment of Wages Act have been violated ?
Arc prosecutions launched in such cases to act as a deterrent ?
If not, why not ?
(e) Have any prosecutions been launched against the Railway
Paymasters or the administration ? If so, does the Honourable
Member propose to lay a statement of such cases on the table
of the House ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : (a) 28th March,
1937.
(b) Yes.
(c) The irregularities detected are brought to the notice of
the Railway Administration for rectification.
* Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. I of 1943, 16th February 1943, p. 285.