Vol. 10 · pages 871–875
As Member of the Governor-General's Executive Council, 1942–46
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 871 (printed page 850)
850 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
of Mines submit reports to him regularly and suitable action is taken
by the Department of Mines.
(c) and (d). The four-week period before and after delivery in respect
of women is in line with similar provision under Factory legislation. The
question of increasing the period before delivery in respect of women
employed underground is under consideration.
Prof. N. G. Ranga : What about after delivery ? Will Government
also consider the advisability of extending the period after delivery ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : It is not necessary. There
is complete prohibition on the employment of women who have delivered.
Mrs. Renuka Ray : Is the Honourable Member aware of the fact
that since the ban on the employment of women underground was
withdrawn, there have been cases in some mines of children being
born underground.
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : I have no information.
Mrs. Renuka Ray : Will the Honourable Member kindly find out
and take steps to see that such cases do not occur ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : If the Honourable Member
will refer me to specific cases, I shall certainly make inquiries.
Mrs. Renuka Ray : I am prepared to do so.
Shrimati K, Radha Bai Subbarayan : May I ask for an assurance
that Government will get the opinion of a competent medical authority
on this important question, before they come to a decision on it ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : They will undoubtedly,
if they find it necessary.
Shrimati K. Radha Bai Subbarayan : Is it not a fact that the
International Labour Conference during its last session suggested that
the period before and after confinement should be about two months
under the Maternity Benefits Act ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : I have no information.
I do not recall that.
Shrimati K. Radha Bai Subbarayan : I understand that it is
mentioned in the report which the Government have circulated to us.
Mrs. Renuka Ray : Since the Honourable Member considers that
he is justified in ignoring the International Convention prohibiting
women working underground, I should like to know if he thinks it
also unnecessary to consider the maternity benefits provision of the
International Labour Conference ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : We are considering that
matter.
PDF page 872
851
L. A. DEBATES (CENTRAL) QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
272
* Abolition of Distinction between Orthodox and
Un-Orthodox Quarters
451. Mr. H. A. Sathar H. Essak Sait : Will the Honourable
the Labour Member be pleased to state :
(a) the reasons that led to the decision to abolish the
distinction between “orthodox” and “un-orthodox”
types of quarters as stated in the Labour Department
Memorandum, dated the 25th January, 1945; and
(b) the effect of this decision on (i) the present occupants
of such quarters and (ii) those who qualify for these
quarters in the future ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : (a) According to the
allotment rules hithertho in force, applicants for accommodation
had to apply either for the orthodox or the un-orthodox type of
quarters and those who applied for one type of quarters were
considered ineligible for the other type. In view of the present
shortage of accommodation, the above rules very often worked
to the disadvantage of the officers eligible for these types of
accommodation, and produced the anomalous result that if an
applicant failed to secure accommodation in the type he had
applied for, he was obliged to go without any accommodation at
all, even though he might have secured accommodation in the
other type, had he applied specifically for that type.
Further, the maintenance of the distinction between the two
types of quarters entailed extra work in the Estate Office in as
much as the allotment of the two types of quarters had to be
kept separate. Besides, it was also felt that the maintenance of
the distinction between orthodox and un-orthodox quarters and
their allotment on the basis of the orthodoxy or otherwise had
become out of date.
(b) (i) None.
(ii) The decision of 25th January 1945 has since been slightly
modified on 15lh February 1945. Those who are eligible for the
particular category of ‘A’, ‘B’, ‘C’ and ‘D’ type of accommodation
will be eligible to apply for both types of quarters.
* Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. I of 1945, 21st February 1945, p. 618.
PDF page 873 (printed page 852)
852 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
273
*Deaths of Women Workers in Mines
453. Mr. K. S. Gupta : (a) Will the Honourable the Labour
Member please state the number of deaths of women workers in
the mines of India (including coal) in the years of 1942, 1943 and
1944 due to (i) diseases, and (ii) accidents ?
(b) Is it not a fact that men workers are not available to work
in coal mines as the wages offered are not commensurate with the
rise in prices of foodstuffs and other necessaries of life ?
(c) Is there any attempt on the part of the mine owners or the
Government of India to offer better wages and special amenities of
life in the supply of foodstuffs and housing accommodation to mine
workers to attract enough men workers to enable the Government
to apply the ban on women working underground and thus save the
dignity of womanhood in India as in every other civilized country ?
(d) Is it not a fact that infant mortality is very high in the mining
areas due to lack of milk from the mother who is automatically
getting dry due to hard and strenuous work underground ?
(e) Is it not a fact that no pure milk is available to the workers
in the mining areas ?
(f) Are any attempts made by the mine-owners or Government
to supply milk free of cost to children at least below one year in
the various mining areas ? If not, why not ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : (a) The number of
deaths of women in all mines in India due to accidents both on
surface and undergound for the years 1942, 1943 and 1944 were
9, 11 and 53 repsectively. No figures of deaths due to diseases
are available.
(b) No.
(c) Yes. The following improvements in regard to wages, welfare
and amenities have been introduced ;
(1) subsidisation of foodstuffs and the provision of grain
shops ;
(2) improved health measures including malaria control and
increased provision for construction of hospitals ;
(3) provision of an adequate range of consumer goods for
purchase;
* Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. I of 1945, 21st February 1945, p. 620.
PDF page 874
853
L. A. DEBATES (CENTRAL) QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
(4) provision of transport to and from work ;
(5) increase in the rates for coal raisings at Railway Colleries
so as to enable the contractors to offer more attractive
wages to labour; and
(6) an informal agreement between Government and the
mine-owners for an increase in the wages of colliery
labour.
(d) It cannot be said that infant mortality is very high in
mining areas due to lack of milk. Infant mortality figure in the
coalfields is less than the All-India figure.
(e) Pure milk is available in mining areas. Samples of milk
are frequently taken and examined by the Inspectors employed by
the Mines Boards of Health and action is taken when adulteration
is discovered.
(f) No. Government are examining further possibilities in
regard to improvement of health of women and children in
mining areas.
274
* Women Workers Working Underground in
Mines
454. Mr. K. S. Gupta : (a) Will the Honourable the Labour
Member please state the number of women workers underground
in the years 1942, 1943 and 1944 ?
(b) Is there any attempt made to reduce the number of women
employed underground ? If not, why not ?
(c) Is it a fact that in certain coal mines women are allowed
or compelled to work even in stages of advanced pregnancy, thus
giving rise to child births underground ? Was any report to that
effect brought to the notice of Government ? If so, what is the
action taken to put a stop to such a malpractice ?
(d) Would Government consider the question of applying a
strict ban on women working underground as soon as the seventh
month of pregnancy is complete ? If not, why not ?
(e) Are Government aware that maternity benefit offered to women
workers is only nominal and that several complaints are made to their
* Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. I of 1945, 21st February 1945, p. 621.
PDF page 875 (printed page 854)
854 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
immediate superiors who do not care to report to the authorities
concerned ?
(f) Does the Honourable Member propose to make an enquiry
and remedy the defects ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : (a) 1942—Nil.,
1943— about 7,000, 1944—16,000.
(b) Yes. Every effort is being made to expedite the bringing
about of such conditions as would enable Government to reimpose the ban on the underground employment of women in
coal mines. In other mines, the ban already exists.
(c) No. So far as I am aware no children have been born
underground in mines. No such reports have ever been received.
The last part of the question does not arise.
(d) A proposal on these lines is under the consideration of
Government.
(e) There are one Senior Labour Inspector and two Junior
Labour Inspectors working under the Chief Inspector of Mines
to administer the Mines Maternity Benefit Act, and every
effort is made to see that the requirements of this Act are
complied with.
(f) No.
275
* Scheme for Recruitment of Gorakhpur Labour for
Employment in Coal Mines
464. Mr. K. C. Neogy : (a) Will the Honourable the Labour
Member be pleased to explain in detail the scheme for the
recruitment of Gorakhpur labour and its employment in the
coal mines ?
(b) What is the total number of labourers so far recruited
under this scheme ? What has been the total expenditure
incurred therefor, and how much of it has been and is expected
to be recovered from the collieries in which the labourers are
employed or intended to be employed ?
* Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. I of 1945, 21st February 1945, p. 629.