Vol. 10 · pages 996–1000
As Member of the Governor-General's Executive Council, 1942–46
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 996
975
L. A. DEBATES (CENTRAL) QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: I know the resolution
very well.
Mr. President: Next question.
Mr. Ahmed E. H. Jaffer : One more question, Sir, Is the
Deputy Secretary’s post a Class I post.
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: There is no such
thing as a Class I post there.
391
* Loss of Public Money in the ‘Delhi Store
Sub-Division Embezzlement Case’
719. Mr. Ahmed E. H. Jaffer: (a) Will the Honourable the
Labour Member please give the approximate amount of loss of
public money in the ‘ Delhi Store Sub-Division Embezzlement
Case ?
(b) Who were the culprits, and what action has so far been
taken to bring them to book ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : (a) There is no
such case as “Delhi Store Sub-Division Embezzlement Case”. If
the Honourable Member has in mind the case of alleged over
payment in cartage of cement in Stores Sub-Division under
Construction Division No. I, I can inform him that the matter
is under investigation.
(b) Does not arise.
Mr. Ahmed E. H. Jaffer : Is it a fact that the S. D. O. in
question who embezzled two lakhs is still in service ?
Mr. President: Order, order. The Honourable Member has
already stated that there was no embezzlement
Mr. Ahmed E. H. Jaffer: I entirely agree with the Honourable
Member’s reply. The point which he refers to is the same that
a sum of two lakhs was overpaid.
Mr. President: My point is that the Honourable Member has
replied that there is no case of embezzlement but only a case
of overpayment. In his next question the Honourable Member
need not again presume embezzlement—he can put a question
on the over payment.
* Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. III of 1946, 6th March 1946, pp. 1935-36.
PDF page 997 (printed page 976)
976 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: The matter is under
investigation and unless and until the result of that investigation
is known Government cannot take any action against the officer.
Mr. Ahmed E. H. Jaffer: I ask whether the S. D. O. concerned
who is responsible for this over-payment of 2 lakhs is still in service.
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: Of course he is.
Mr. Ahmed E. H. Jaffer : Why ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: Because the case is
not yet proved against him.
Mr. Ahmed E. H. Jaffer : In such cases where matters are
under investigation is it not the practice to keep the officer concerned
under suspension?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: Not unless we receive
the report of the investigation.
Mr. Ahmed E. H. Jaffer: Is it because he is of the Scheduled
Caste ?
Haji Abdus Sattar Haji Seth: With regard to part (a) about
the amount involved-cannot my friend tell me what the amount
involved is?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : I must have notice
of the question. As regards Mr. Jaffer’s question, I would like to
inform the Honourable Member that the man does not belong to
the Scheduled Castes.
Prof. N. G. Ranga : Even if he did belong to the Scheduled Caste,
is it wrong not to suspend a man when there is a case against him ?
Mr. President: Order, order—No argument.
Sri M. Ananthasayanam Ayyangar : How long has this been
under investigation and is it departmental or by the police ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : So far as I remember—
I cannot say definitely—the matter of course is investigated by the
C. D.
392
* Grievances of Muslims Re: Appointments as
Superintending Engineers
720. Mr. Muhammad Rahmat-Ullah: (a) Has the attention
of the Honourable the Labour Member been drawn to the articles
* Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. III of 1946, 6th March 1946, p. 1936.
PDF page 998
977
L. A. DEBATES (CENTRAL) QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
published in the Dawn of the 27th October, 12th November
and 19th December, 1945 ? What action has been taken to
redress the grievances of the Mussalmans ? If not, why not ?
(b) Is it not a fact that out of the fourteen Superintending
Engineers only one is a Muslim ?
(c) Are Government aware that there are three qualified
Executive Engineers in the Headquarters who are competent
to hold the office of Superintending Engineer?
(d) Are Government aware that persons of less
qualifications and standing of other communities have been
appointed Superintending Engineers, if so, why were the
claims of the Mussalmans ignored ?
(e) Are Government aware that an I. S. E. Muslim
Executive Engineer was ignored and the chance of a
Superintending Engineer in the Headquarters Office was
given to an officer who has risen from the ranks and is to
retire very shortly ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : (a) I have
seen the articles. The posts in the Central Public Works
Department which are subject to the operation of the
communal representation rules, are duly filled in accordance
with the requirement of those rules. It is, however, not
possible to earmark individual posts for officers of a
particular community.
(b) Yes.
(c) It is not clear which Executive Engineers the
Honourable Member referring to. None of the Executive
Engineers of the Central Public Works Department who are
posted in Delhi have, however, become due for promotion
to the rank of Superintending Engineer.
(d) and (e) The posts of Superintending Engineer are
Selection Posts and appointments to these are made purely
on the basis of merit. In filling these posts the claims of all
eligible Executive Engineers are considered and the officer
who is considered to be most suitable is appointed. The case
of the I. S. E. Muslim Officer mentioned by the Honourable
Member was also duly considered.
PDF page 999 (printed page 978)
978 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
393
* Grant of Money for Taming River Kosi
in Bihar
734. Shri Satya Narayan Sinha: (a) Is the Honourable
the Labour Member aware that the Governor General, during
his last tour of Bihar, had flown to the area devastated by
the vagaries of the river Kosi and that he was so much
impressed with the pitiable situation obtaining there that
he decided to move the Central Government for granting an
adequate amount for taming the river and thus to save the
lives and properties of the millions of the people concerned ?
If so, what is being done in that regard ?
(b) Has any project been made ready ? If not, what steps
are being taken to expedite the matter which concerns the
question of life and death for millions of people ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : (a) The Governor
General during a recent tour did fly over the area devastated
by the Kosi floods and did cause a communication to be sent
to the Labour Department emphasising the importance of
controlling the river as early as possible.
(b) The Central Waterways, Irrigation and Navigation
Commission are conducting the investigations. They
have with the permission of the government of Nepal
started aerial and ground surveys and the geological and
hydrological investigations for the purpose. Investigation is
being conducted with a view to planning the control of the
Kosi by means of a storage dam in the Nepal Himalayas.
Such dam will not only store surplus flood water and the
large volumes of coarse silt carried by it and so prevent the
damage at present caused by Kosi floods but it is hoped
will also provide water for perennial irrigation of an area
estimated at 3 million in both Nepal and Bihar and also
will offer opportunities for the generation of cheap hydroelectric power. The investigation is being treated as one of
high priority.
* Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. III of 1946, 6th March 1946, p. 1949.
PDF page 1000
979
L. A. DEBATES (CENTRAL) QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
394
* Loss to Junior Copyholders in Government
Press, New Delhi
740. Maulana Zafar Ali Khan : (a) Will the Honourable
the Labour Member kindly state whether it is a fact that
in the Government of India Press, New Delhi many Junior
Readers are sustaining a loss of Rs. 10 or Rs. 5 per month
in their promotion from the post of a Copyholder to that of
a Junior Reader, and that the rate of increment too is Rs. 5
per annum in the case of Copyholders whereas Rs. 3 only for
Junior Readers ?
(b) What steps do Government propose to take to compensate
them for their monetary loss and redress the anomaly in the
existing rates of pay of a Copyholder and a Junior Reader ?
(c) Is it also a fact that the arrears of the unified scale of
pay to Copyholders sanctioned in the month of July, 1945, still
remain unpaid, in spite of there being several representations
in person ?
(d) What are the reasons therefor, and do Government
propose to give any compensation for such delay under the
Payment of Wages Act ? If not, why not ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: (a) Yes, in the
case of those Copyholders who chose the unified scale of pay
and were later promoted as Junior Readers.
(b) The question is under consideration.
(c) Yes.
(d) Although issued in July 1945 the orders had retrospective
effect from September 1st 1944. Time had to be allowed to
the employees concerned to elect for the unified scale. Then
the pay of those who chose the scale had to be fixed allowing
each the benefit of past service to the extent of three years.
The accounts authorities are pre-auditing the bills. Payment
will be made shortly. The reply to the latter portion of the
question is in the negative.
* Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. Ill of 1946, 6th March 1946, p. 1952.