Vol. 11 · pages 106–110

87 THE BUDDHA AND HIS PREDECESSORS I 37. The rest of Kapila’s teachings he just bypassed as being irrelevant for his purpose. § 3. The Bramhanas 1. Next to the Vedas are the religious books known as the Bramhanas. Both were held as sacred books. Indeed the Bramhanas are a part of the Vedas. The two went together and were called by a common name Sruti. 2. There were four theses on which the Bramhanic Philosophy rested. 3. The first thesis was that the Vedas are not only sacred but that they are infallible and they are not to be questioned. 4. The second thesis of the Bramhanic Philosophy was that salvation of the soul—that is escape from transmigration—can be had only by the due performance of Vedic sacrifices and observances of religious rites and ceremonies and the offering of gifts to Brahmins. 5. The Brahmins had not only a theory of an ideal religion as contained in the Vedas but they also had a theory for an ideal society. 6. The pattern of this ideal society they named Chaturvarna. It is imbedded in the Vedas and as the Vedas are infallible and as their authority cannot be questioned so also Chaturvarna as a pattern of society was binding and unquestionable. 7. This pattern of society was based upon certain rules. 8. The first rule was that society should be divided into four classes: (1) Brahmins; (2) Kshatriyas; (3) Vaishyas; and (4) Shudras. 9. The second rule was that there cannot be social equality among these four classes. They must be bound together by the rule of graded inequality. 10. The Brahmins to be at the top, the Kshatriyas to be kept below the Brahmins but above the Vaishyas, the Vaishyas to be below the Kshatriyas but above the Shudras and the Shudras to be the lowest of all.

88 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES I 11. These four classes were not to be equal to one another in the matter of rights and privileges. The rule of graded inequality governed the question of rights and privileges. 12. The Brahmin had all the rights and privileges which he wished to claim. But a Kshatriya could not claim the rights and privileges which a Brahmin could. He had more rights and privileges than a Vaishya could claim. The Vaishya had more rights and privileges than a Shudra. But he could not claim the rights and privileges which a Kshatriya could. And the Shudra was not entitled to any right, much less any privilege. His privilege was to subsist without offending the three superior classes. 13. The third rule of Chaturvarna related to the division of occupations. The occupation of the Brahmin was learning and teaching and the performance of religious observances. The occupations of the Kshatriya was fighting. Trade was assigned to the Vaishyas. The occupations of the Shudras was service of the three superior classes. These occupations assigned to different classes were exclusive. One class could not trespass upon the occupation of the other. 14. The fourth rule of Chaturvarna related to the right to education. The pattern of Chaturvarna gave the right to education to the first three classes, the Brahmins, Kshatriyas and Vaishyas. The Shudras were denied the right to education. This rule of Chaturvarna did not deny the right to education to the Shudras only. It denied the right to education to all women including those belonging to the class of Brahmins, Kshatriyas and Vaishyas. 15. There was a fifth rule. According to it, man’s life was divided into four stages. The first stage was called Bramhacharya ; the second stage was called Grahastashram; the third stage was called Vanaprasta and the fourth stage was called Sannyasa. 16. The object of the first stage was study and education. The object of the second stage was to live a married life. The object of the third stage was

89 THE BUDDHA AND HIS PREDECESSORS I to familiarise a man with the life of a hermit, i.e., severing family ties, but without deserting his home. The object of the fourth stage was to enable a man to go in search of God and seek union with him. 17. The benefits of these stages were open only to the male members of the three superior classes. The first stage was not open to the Shudras and women. Equally the last stage was not open to the Shudras and women. 18. Such was the divine pattern of an ideal society called Chaturvarna. The Brahmins had idealised the rule and had realised the ideal without leaving any cracks or loopholes. 19. The fourth thesis of Brahmanic Philosophy was the doctrine of Karma. It was part of the thesis of transmigration of the soul. The Karma of the Brahmins was an answer to the question: “Where did the soul land on transmigration with his new body on new birth ?” The answer of the Brahmanic Philosophy was that it depended on a man’s deeds in his past life. In other words, it depended on his Karma. 20. The Buddha was strongly opposed to the first tenet of Brahmanism. He repudiated their thesis that the Vedas are infallible and their authority could never be questioned. 21. In his opinion, nothing was infallible and nothing could be final. Everything must be open to reexamination and reconsideration whenever grounds for re-examination and reconsideration arise. 22. Man must know the truth and real truth. To him freedom of thought was the most essential thing. And he was sure that freedom of thought was the only way to the discovery of truth. 23. Infallibility of the Vedas meant complete denial of freedom of thought. 24. For these reasons this thesis of the Brahmanic Philosophy was most obnoxious to him. 25. He was equally an opponent of the second thesis of the Brahmanic Philosophy. The Buddha did admit that there was any virtue in a sacrifice. But

90 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES I he made a distinction between true sacrifice and false sacrifice. 26. Sacrifice in the sense of self-denial for the good of others he called true sacrifice. Sacrifice in the sense of killing an animal as an offering to God for personal benefit he regarded as a false sacrifice. 27. The Brahmanic sacrifices were mostly sacrifices of animals to please their gods. He condemned them as false sacrifices. He would not allow them even though they be performed with the object of getting salvation for the soul. 28. The opponents of sacrifices used to ridicule the Brahmins by saying : “If one can go to heaven by sacrificing an animal why should not one sacrifice one’s own father. That would be a quicker way of going to heaven.” 29. The Buddha wholeheartedly agreed with this view. 30. The theory of Chaturvarna was as repugnant to the Buddha as the theory of sacrifices was repulsive to him. 31. The organization of society set up by Brahmanism in the name of Chaturvarna did not appear to him a natural organization. Its class composition was compulsory and arbitrary. It was a society made to order. He preferred an open society and a free society. 32. The Chaturvarna of the Brahmins was a fixed order never to be changed. Once a Brahmin always a Brahmin. Once a Kshatriya always a Kshatriya, once a Vaishya always a Vaishya and once a Shudra always a Shudra. Society was based on status conferred upon an individual by the accident of his birth. Vice, however heinous, was no ground for degrading a man from his status, and virtue, however great, had no value to raise him above it. There was no room for worth nor for growth. 33. Inequality exists in every society. But it was different with Brahmanism. The inequality preached by Brahmins was its official doctrine. It was not a mere growth. Brahmanism did not believe in equality. In fact, it was opposed to equality.

91 THE BUDDHA AND HIS PREDECESSORS I 34. Brahmanism was not content with inequality. The soul of Brahmanism lay in graded inequality. 35. Far from producing harmony, graded inequality, the Buddha thought, might produce in society an ascending scale of hatred and a descending scale of contempt, and might be a source of perpetual conflict. 36. The occupations of the four classes were also fixed. There was no freedom of choice. Besides, they were fixed not in accordance with skill but in accordance with birth. 37. On a careful review of the rules of Chaturvarna the Buddha had no difficulty in coming to the conclusion that the philosophic foundations on which the social order was reared by Brahmanism were wrong if not selfish. 38. It was clear to him that it did not serve the interests of all, much less did it advance the welfare of all. Indeed, it was deliberately designed to make many serve the interests of the few. In it man was made to serve a class of self-styled supermen. 39. It was calculated to suppress and exploit the weak and to keep them in a state of complete subjugation. 40. The law of Karma as formulated by the Brahmins, thought the Buddha, was calculated to sap the spirit of revolt completely. No one was responsible for the suffering of man except he himself. Revolt could not alter the state of suffering ; for suffering was fixed by his past Karma as his lot in this life. 41. The Shudras and women—the two classes whose humanity was most mutilated by Brahmanism, had no power to rebel against the system. 42. They were denied the right to knowledge with the result that by reason of their enforced ignorance they could not realize what had made their condition so degraded. They could not know that Brahmanism had robbed them completely of the significance of their life. Instead of rebelling against Brahmanism they had become the devotees and upholders of Brahmanism. 43. The right to bear arms is the ultimate means of achieving freedom which a human being has.