Vol. 11 · pages 266–270
The Buddha and His Dhamma
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 266
PART IV
What is Not—Dhamma
1. Belief in the Supernatural is Not—Dhamma.
2. Belief in Ishwara (God) is Not Essentially Part
of Dhamma.
3. Dhamma Based on Union with Brahma is a False
Dhamma.
4. Belief in Soul is Not—Dhamma.
5. Belief in Sacrifices is Not—Dhamma.
6. Belief Based on Speculation is Not—Dhamma.
7. Reading Books of Dhamma is Not—Dhamma.
8. Belief in the Infallibility of Books of Dhamma is
Not— Dhamma.
PDF page 267
No text on this page (it may be blank, a title page or an image).
PDF page 268
249
WHAT IS NOT—DHAMMA
III
§ 1. Belief in the Supernatural is Not—
Dhamma
1. Whenever any phenomenon occurs, humanity is
always wanting to know how it has happened, what is
the cause of it.
2. Sometimes cause and the effect are so proximate
and so close that it is not difficult to account for the
occurrence of the event.
3. But often-times the effect is so far away from
the cause for the effect is not accountable. Apparently
there appears to be no cause for it.
4. Then the question arises: How has this event
occurred ?
5. The commonest answer is that the occurrence of
the event is due to some supernatural cause which is
often called a miracle.
6. The Buddha’s predecessors gave very different
answers to this question.
7. Pakauda Katyana denied that there was a cause
for every event. Events, he said, occurred independently.
8. Makhali Ghosal admitted that an event must have
a cause. But he preached that the cause is not to be
found in human agency but is to be sought in nature,
necessity, inherent laws of things, predestination or
the like.
9. The Buddha repelled these doctrines. He
maintained that not only every event has a cause but
the cause is the result of some human action or natural
law.
10. His contention against the doctrine of Time,
Nature, Necessity, etc., being the cause of the occurrence
of an event, was this.
11. If Time, Nature, Necessity, etc., be the sole cause
of the occurrence of an event, then who are we ?
12. Is man merely a puppet in the hands of Time,
Nature, Chance, Gods, Fate, Necessity ?
13. What is the use of man’s existence if he is
not free ? What is the use of man’s intelligence if he
continues to believe in supernatural causes ?
PDF page 269 (printed page 250)
250 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
III
14. If man is free, then every event must be the
result of man’s action or of an act of Nature. There
cannot be any event which is supernatural in its origin.
15. It may be that man is not able to discover the
real cause of the occurrence of an event. But if he has
intelligence he is bound one day to discover it.
16. In repudiating supernaturalism the Buddha
had three objects.
17. His first object was to lead man to the path
of rationalism.
18. His second object was to free man to go in
search of truth.
19. His third object was to remove the most potent
source of superstition, the result of which is to kill
the spirit of inquiry.
20. This is called the law of Kamma or Causation.
21. This doctrine of Kamma and Causation is
the most central doctrine in Buddhism. It preaches
Rationalism and Buddhism is nothing if not
rationalism.
22. That is why worship of the supernatural is
Not—Dhamma.
§ 2. Belief in Ishwara (God) is Not Essentially
Part of Dhamma
1. Who created the world is a common question.
That the world was created by God is also a very.
common answer.
2. In the Brahmanic scheme this God is called by
a variety of names—Prajapati, Ishwar, Brahma or
Maha Brahma.
3. To the question who this God is and how He
came into being there is no answer.
4. Those who believe in God describe Him as a being
who is omnipotent, i.e., all-powerful, Omnipresent, i.e.,
he fills the whole universe, and Omniscient, i.e., he
knows everything.
PDF page 270
251
WHAT IS NOT—DHAMMA
III
5. There are also certain moral qualities which are
attributed to God. God is said to be good, God is said
to be just and God is said to be all-loving.
6. The question is did the Blessed Lord accept God
as the creator of the universe.
7. The answer is, “No.” He did not.
8. There are various grounds why he rejected the
doctrine of the Existence of God.
9. Nobody has seen God. People only speak of God.
10. God is unknown and unseen.
11. Nobody can prove that God has created the world.
The world has evolved and is not created.
12. What advantage can there be in believing in
God ? It is unprofitable.
13. The Buddha said that a religion based on God
is based on speculation.
14. A religion based on God is, therefore, not worth
having.
15. It only ends in creating superstition.
16. The Buddha did not leave the question there.
He discussed the question in its various aspects.
17. The grounds on which he rejected the doctrine
were various.
18. He argued that the doctrine of the Existence of
God is not based on truth.
19. This he made clear in his dialogue with the two
Brahmins, Vasettha and Bhardvaja.
20. Now a dispute arose between them as to which
was the true path of salvation and which false.
21. About the time the Blessed One was journeying
through Kosala with a great company of the brethren
he happened to halt at the Brahmin village called
Manaskata and stayed in the mango grove on the bank
of the river Akiravati.
22. Manaskata was the town in which Vasettha and
Bhardvaja lived. Having heard that the Blessed Lord
was staying in their town, they went to him and each
one put forth his point of view.
23. Bhardvaja said : “The path of Tarukkha is the
straight path, this is the direct way which makes