Library › Vol. 12

Vol. 12 · pages 21–25

Unpublished writings; Ancient Indian Commerce; Notes on Laws; Waiting for a Visa; and more

This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.

PDF page 21

Open the original page

No text on this page (it may be blank, a title page or an image).

PDF page 22

Open the original page

CHAPTER I COMMERCIAL RELATIONS OF INDIA IN THE MIDDLE EAST †The imperial Romans flashed their sword both in the East and the West with different results. In the East “they conquered the world only to give it to” 1 *(............) in the West however “they either Romanized the races who were at first their subjects *(..........) masters, or left those races to be the willing agents of their own Romanization.” 2. As a result of this Romanization the West is proud of her heritage from the Romans. How this rich heritage was accumulated none has taken pains to inquire into. Justly may we look to the Romans for their military organization, the elaboration of law and the wonderful discipline of hordes levied before war and discharged after victory. Hemmed in from all sides—the Etruscans pressing in from the north, the Lygurians from the West, the Sabians from the East and the Greeks from the South, the Latins summoned the energy by dispair. Excepting perhaps the women and youngsters of both sexes the entire population was one huge militia ever ready to rally round the red flag at the call of a trumpet. But Rome gathered in energy too voluminous for the space she had and illustrated the principle that concentration causes explosion and expansion. Goaded by the greed of territory or pressed on by the mania of foreign persecution she started first by consuming the entire Italian peninsula. But imperialism conscious or unconscious knows no stop. Rome by sheer prowess of her arms went on in her career of conquest and made war her only noble profession. She knew not that war like competition destroys itself. In one great sweep, she brought an immense territory †First page of the MS. is missing. The MS. starts from the 2nd page—ed. * Portion eaten by moth or white-ants is shown by asterisk in brackets—ed. 1 Quoted by Earl of Cromer “Ancient and modern Imperialism”, p. 72. *Ibid., p.73.

PDF page 23 (printed page 2)

Open the original page

2 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES under her control but left the circle of her extensive imperium to shrink back towards the centre when the propelling energy from within had, as it was sure to be, exhausted itself. Beside their military exploits and inhuman gladiatorial feats, the Romans (owed)* credit from the art of road-building and administration; these arts are quite natural and necessary concomittants of imperialism. (Beside these)* there (was)* little of the Roman contribution to civilization that cannot be summed up in the phrase pax Romana. Underneath the canopy of Roman Imperialism there was a constant and “peaceful in filteration”, (of the East)*. Philosophy, astronomy, mathematics, medicine constitute her bequests. Scholarship incompatible with the practical genius of the Romans, was the trade of the Orientals. The Roman Court was begemmed by the stars from the East. Egypt lays claim to Ptolemy and Plotinus: Porphyry and Iamblichus are the sons of Syria while Dioscorides and Galen were Asiatics. Much of the Roman Civilization was made up by the doings of the Eastern slaves who even conducted the education of the Roman children in the public schools established under the empire. Romans were the lovers of the powerful rather than of the beautiful: “Rome, in herself inartistic, enlaned art and artists for her own purpose. Her barbaric delight in vivid colouring, which for instance, was exhibited in the gold and scarlet decoration on the great column of Trojan, was stimulated by eastern commerce” 1. Even Roman architecture is the product of the oriental slaves. The entire strength of Rome was spent in conquest or if we choose, in the struggle for existence. But after enough of struggle she might have as well utilized the leisure which was hers and availed herself of the varied geniuses brought within her compass by her subject people. Unfortunately Rome never realized or it was too late (that she)* did that “peace hath her victories no less renowned than war” and (her)* militarism pure and simple is thrown in great relief when we notice the (...........)* fact that “although Rome raised a statue to Quiet, * Portions in bracket are eaten by termites. Words supplied—ed. 1 W. R. Paterson, “ The Nemesis of Nations” , p. 307.

PDF page 24 (printed page 3)

Open the original page

3COMMERCIAL RELATIONS IN THE MIDDLE EAST she (...........)* out (...........)* walls” 1. Though Rome had some industries, her productive capacity was miserably low; her consumption overran her production which necessiated continual drain of specie. The Latefundia destroyed her agriculture and (drove)* the farmers to beggary and made Rome entirely dependent for her food on Sicily and Egypt. Owing to the great concentration of landed property the land had ceased to be productive, and there was practically no Italian harvest. She received everything mostly from the East and nothing or little to give in return. “It is in the orient, especially in these countries of old civilization that we must look for industry and riches for technical ability and artistic productions as well as for intelligence and science, even before Constantine made it [Rome] the centre of political power”. 2 Nay “all branches of learning were affected by the spirit of the orient” 3 which “was her superior in extent and precision of its technical knowledge as well as in the inventive genius and ability of its workman”.4 Descending from the productions of industrial arts to those of industry itself, one might also trace the growing influence of the Orient: one might show how the action of the great manufacturing centres of the East gradually transformed the material civilization of Europe ; one might point out how the introduction in Gaul of Exotic patterns and processes changed the old native industry and gave (their)* products a perfection and a popularity hitherto unknown.” 5 From time immemorial upto the Industrial Revolution, the East enjoyed (the)* pre-eminence of being the workshop of the world and it is significant to (note that)* she was busy in producing the wonderful and massive iron columns that attest to the mechanics and technique of the time when chipping a stone and making a hatchet was a superhuman task with the Western neolith. * Portions in brackets shown by asterisk are eaten by termites. Words supplied—ed. 1 W. R. Patterson, “ The Nemesis of Nations”, p. 334. 2 Franz Cumont, Oriental Religions in Roman Paganism, p. 2. 3 Ibid, p. 6. 4 Ibid, p. 8. 5 Ibid, p.9.

PDF page 25 (printed page 4)

Open the original page

4 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES Thus “the East gave (impe)* tus to the West.” 1 It is in the valley of the Nile, the Euphrates, the Yangtse Kang and the Indus that we first witness the misty dawn of civilization, the beginning of knowledge and progress.” To have caught the light from the East and reflected it with manifold lustre on the West is the only work of Greece and Rome.” 2 Looked at from this angle the dragon of “Dark Ages” seems to be a fictitious creation of the historian. Were there any such Dark ages in Europe ? If so, when was there light ? History does not disclose it. Whatever light or civilization there was, was confined to the Eastern basin of the Mediterranean [being constantly fed by the Orient] barring which the entire continent of Europe was in barbarism till very late : the Curve of European Civilization (leaving aside the sources on which it drew) is constantly rising and what the historian calls Dark ages mark a point of civilization higher than the one reached by preceding centuries. The fiction of the ‘Dark ages’ arose from the fallacy of the thinking of whole of Europe in terms of Rome, but nothing is more false than to think of the whole in terms of a part. To be true to facts the question of the ‘Dark Ages’ has to be raised (by the) historian of the Orient. It is he who has to answer why this great (fall) after a high crest, why this sudden darkness after the (dawn): It is lamentable to see that the earliest and most promising civilizations ran into a blind alley and were arrested all of a sudden when progress was most expected of them. Some of these early civilizations died out leaving us their records on bricks and tablets. Others are lingering on in their way and are in the process of rejuvenation. The civilization of India is one of the oldest but like all of them has come to a dead stop : but it has lived to revive and we may hope never to die again. The contact of the west has shaken the “fixity” and restored her old dynamic power. * Portions in brackets shown by asterisk are eaten by termites. Words supplied—ed. 1 Brooks Adams, Law of Civilization and decay, p. 2 R. C. Dutt.