Vol. 12 · pages 296–300
Unpublished writings; Ancient Indian Commerce; Notes on Laws; Waiting for a Visa; and more
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 296 (printed page 3)
No text on this page (it may be blank, a title page or an image).
PDF page 297
No text on this page (it may be blank, a title page or an image).
PDF page 298 (printed page 277)
277LAW OF SPECIFIC RELIEF
(Earlier portion not found—ed.)
****
Nature that the law permits its Specific Performance
(ii) Where the Plaintiff is a person in whose favour
Specific Performance can be granted.
(iii) Where the Defendant is a person against whom
Specific Performance might be granted.
The question is : Is the Court bound to grant Specific Relief
in such cases ?
The answer to this question is contained in Sec. 22.
(A) Section 22 lays down general rules—(1) It says that
Specific Relief is discretionary. The Court may grant it or may
refuse it. The Court is not bound to grant it merely because
it is lawful.
(2) The discretion of the Court is not arbitrary, sound and
reasonable, guided by judicial principles.
(B) Section 22 also specifies cases in which Court may
exercise discretion not to grant Specific Performance and
cases in which Court may excercise discretion to grant Specific
Performance.
Cases in which Court may exercise discretion
not to grant Specific Performance
(i) Where Specific Performance would give unfair advantage
over the Defendant.
(ii) Where Specific Performance would involve some
hardship on the Defendant which he did not foresee and nonperformance would not involve such hardship on the Plaintiff.
Cases in which Court may exercise discretion to
grant Specific Performance
Where the Plaintiff has done substantial acts or suffered
losses in consequence of a contract capable of Specific
Performance.
PDF page 299 (printed page 278)
278 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
Damages and Specific Performance
Sections 19, 20, 29.
Two remedies for breach. Are the mutually exclusive or
are they complimentary ? Does one bar the other ?
These are question which are considered in Sections 19,
20, 29. The rules contained in these three may be summarized
as below :
19. (i) In the same suit, a Plaintiff can ask for both in
addition or in substitution.
(iii) In a suit where Court desides not to grant Specific
Performance Court can grant Compensation to Plaintiff if
entitled.
(iv) If one suit Court may grant compensation in addition
to Specific Performance if it comes to the conclusion to Specific
Performance is not enough.
20. (v) The fact that liquidated damages have been agreed
upon is no bar to Specific Performance.
29. (vi) If suit for Specific Performance is decreed, it will
be a bar to a suit for damages.
zz
PDF page 300
No text on this page (it may be blank, a title page or an image).