Vol. 12 · pages 396–400
Unpublished writings; Ancient Indian Commerce; Notes on Laws; Waiting for a Visa; and more
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 396 (printed page 375)
375THE LAW OF TRUST
Explain—
(1) Suits based on title.
(2) Suits based on possession.
(a) By adverse possession.
(b) By dispossession.
(3) Suits based on partition.
Group VI.—Suits to set aside Decrees or Documents obtained
by fraud—91, 95.
Explain.
Group VII.—Suits to set aside Decrees and Orders of Courts
and Government Officers —11, 11A, 12, 13, 14.
Group VIII.—Suits on Registered Documents —116.
Group IX.— Suits on Forts.
Explain. —Malicious prosecution—when right to sue
begins—2, ..........3.
Group X.—Suits on Contracts.
Division II—Appeals (Page left blank)
Division III—Applications (Page left blank)
VII—Law of Prescription (Page left blank)
zz
PDF page 397
No text on this page (it may be blank, a title page or an image).
PDF page 398
No text on this page (it may be blank, a title page or an image).
PDF page 399
No text on this page (it may be blank, a title page or an image).
PDF page 400 (printed page 1)
I. INTRODUCTORY
1 What is the nature of the Law of Limitation ?
1. There are various ways in which a time-limit enters
into a course of litigation :
(1) Cases where the law says action shall be taken within a
stated period:
Illus. —Order 6 Rule 18.—Amendment of a Plaint. Party
obtaining leave to amend must amend within the time fixed by the
Court for amendment and if no time is fixed then within 14 days.
(2) Cases where the law says action shall not be taken before
a certain period has elapsed.
Illus.—Section 80 of the C. P. C.—Suit against Secretary of
State. No suit shall be instituted against the Secretary of State
for India in Council or against any public officer in respect of any
Act purporting to be done by such public officer in his official
capacity, until the expiration of two months next after notice in
writing has been given.
(3) Cases in which the law prescribes that action shall not be
taken after a certain period has elapsed.
2. It is the third class of cases which strictly speaking
constitute the subject-matter of the Law of Limitation.
2 Distinction between Limitation—Estoppel—
Acquiescence and Laches
All these have the effect of denying to an aggrieved party
a remedy for the wrong done to him. That being so it is
necessary to distinguish them from Limitation as such.
Limitation and Estoppel
1. By Limitation a person is prevented from getting relief
because of his having brought the action after the time
prescribed for bringing his suit.
2. By Estoppel a person fails to get relief because he is
prevented by law from adducing evidence to prove his case.
Limitation and Acquiescence
1. Limitation defeats a suitor in the matter of obtaining
relief for a wrong because he has consented to the doing of
the wrong because his suit is beyond time.
2. Acquiescence defeats a suitor in the matter of obtaining
relief for a wrong becasue he has consented to the doing of
the wrong.