Vol. 12 · pages 456–460
Unpublished writings; Ancient Indian Commerce; Notes on Laws; Waiting for a Visa; and more
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 456 (printed page 435)
435THE LAW OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE IN BRITISH INDIA
Section 367
Every judgement unless otherwise provided shall be
written by the presiding officer of the Court or from his
dictation.
Shall contain
(1) Point or points for determination
(2) The decision thereon and
(3) The reasons for the decision
(4) Shall be dated and signed by the Presiding officer in open
Court at the time of pronouncing it, and where it is not written
by the Presiding officer with his own hand, every page of such
judgement shall be signed by him.
(5) It shall specify the offence (if any) of which, and the Section
of the I. P. C. or other law under which the accused is convicted,
and the punishment to which he is sentenced.
(6) When the conviction is under the I. P. C. and it is doubtful
under which of the two parts of the same section of that Code
the offence falls, the Court shall directly express the same and
pass judgement in the alternative.
(7) If it be a judgement of acquittal it shall state the offence
of which he is acquitted and direct that he be set at liberty.
(8) If the accused is convicted of offence punishable with
death, and the Court sentences him to any punishment other
than death, the Court shall give reasons.
Provided that in trials by jury, the Court need not write a
judgement but the Court of Session shall record heads of charge.
Section 368
When sentence of death—sentence shall direct that he
be hanged by the neck till he is dead.
Section 369
Alteration of judgement
Save as otherwise provided by the Code or other law
or in the case of the High Court, no Court, when it has
signed its judgement, shall alter or review the same except
to correct a clerical error.
(Even the High Court has no power.)
PDF page 457 (printed page 436)
436 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
Section 370
Judgement by a Presidency Magistrate
Instead of recording a judgement in the above, a Presidency
Magistrate shall record the following particulars :
(a) Serial number.
(b) The date of the commission of offences.
(c) Name of the complainant (if any).
(d) Name of the accused and (except in the case of European
British subject) his percentage and residence.
(e) The offence complained of or proved.
(f) Plea of the accused and his exam (if any).
(g) Final order.
(h) Date of such order.
(i) In all cases, where the sentence is imprisonment or fine
exceeding 200 or both, a brief statement of reasons for the conviction.
Section 371
Copy of judgement to be given to accused without delay
In cases other than summons cases it shall be given free
of cost.
In trials by jury, a copy of heads of charge by the jury
shall be given to him.
In sentence of death, shall inform the accused of the period
of limit for appeal.
Section 373
Court of Session to send copy of finding and sentence to
the District Magistrate.
Criminal proceedings other than trial of an offender
I. Those dealing with keeping of peace and maintening
good order.
II. Those dealing with the enforcement of certain obligations.
Family obligation and public nuisance.
III. Those dealing with the maintenance of public peace.
I. THOSE DEALING WITH THE P UBLIC A SSEMBLY—KEEPING OF
PEACE AND MAINTAINING ORDER.
It is better to prevent crime than only to punish it when
it is committed.
PDF page 458 (printed page 437)
437THE LAW OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE IN BRITISH INDIA
This theory is not accepted universally. Attempt to prevent
crime may involve undue interference in the liberty of the
individual.
English theory is inclined towards the view that the state
should intervene only when the conduct of an individual
amounts to a crime.
E. g.—English law of sedition, assembly.
On the other hand, the Indian Law takes a different view.
E. g. Press Act, Public Meetings Act.
That being so, the Criminal Procedure Code enacts
certain Sections to enable the Criminal Courts to prevent the
commission of offences.
(Page left blank—ed.)
****
Chapter VIII deals with offences against public tranquillity.
(Page left blank—ed.)
****
The Court Contemplates the following usage fit for such
preventative or anticipatory action.
1. There are quarrelsome people in every country in the
world, and there are some quarrels which may lead to violence
and even to serious crime.
2. In the same way certain forms of propaganda, if carried
on without any restraint, may induce ignorant persons to do
harmful things, they may be circulating falsehoods, or even
more deadly half-truths, cause ignorant persons to believe, to
act upon the belief, that malicious designs are being entertained
which in fact are not entertained by any one.
3. Again there are those who prefer a life of idleness, varied
by occasional crime when detection seems unlikely, to one of
honest work. There are also persons who live mainly on the
proceeds of crime committed by themselves, or on a share of
the proceeds of crime committed by others, whom they help
to escape detection, or assist by setting up an organization
which affords its supporters both opportunity to dispose of the
proceeds of their dishonesty and a fair prospect of immunity
from punishment.
PDF page 459 (printed page 438)
438 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
4. Habitual Offenders.
Section 183
9. Where an offence is committed while the offender is on a
journey or voyage, the offence may be inquired into or tried by
a Court through or into the local limits of whose jurisdiction
the offender or
the person against, whom or passed in the course
the thing in respect of which of that journey or voyage.
the offence was commuted
Section 184
10. All offences against the provisions of any law for the
time being in force relating to Railways, Telegraphs, the Post
office, or Arms and Ammunitions, may be inquired into and
tried in a Presidency Town.
Section 185
11. In cases of doubt, High Court to decide upon which
Subordinate Court is to have jurisdiction.
Where two or more subordinate Courts, not subordinate to
the same High Court, the High Court within whose appellate
Cr. Jurisdiction the proceedings were first commenced, may
decide and give directions.
Section 186
12. When a Presidency Magistrate, District Magistrate or
Sub-Div. Magistrate or a Magistrate of the 1st Class especially
empowered by Local Government sees reason to believe that
any person within the local limits of his jurisdiction has
committed an offence without such local limits (within or
without British India) an offence which cannot be inquired
into or tried within such local limits, but which by some
law for the time being in force, be inquired into or tried in
British India.
Such Magistrate may inquire into the offence and compel
such persons to appear and send him to a Magistrate having
jurisdiction.
PDF page 460 (printed page 439)
439THE LAW OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE IN BRITISH INDIA
Offences committed outside British India
So far we have dealt with offences committed within the
limits of British India. Suppose now that although the offender
is within British India but the offence is committed outside
British India, how is the situation to be dealt with?
It may be dealt with in two ways—
I. The offender may be sent up for trial in the country
where the offence was committed.
II. The offender may be tried in British India. The first
is known as dealing in extradition. The second may be called
dealing in ex-territorial jurisdiction.
I. Extradition out side India may be to any—
(a) Native State
(b) Foreign State
(c) His Majesty’s Dominions.
(a) Native State
Extradition to a Native State is governed by the Indian
Extradition Act of 1903.
* ***
Having regard to the Statutes of Parliament and the Acts
of the Indian Legislature I make the following geographical
divisions of this globe for the purpose of jurisdiction of the
secular Courts :
(1) Territorial divisions of land and foreign country governed
by the Cr. P. C. and other enactments of the Indian Imperial
Legislature.
(2) Territorial waters governed by Statutes 41 and 42 Vic. C. 73.
(3) High seas governed by statutes 12 and 13 Vic. C. 96
(admiralty offence (colonial) 23 and 24 Vic. C. 88 and 37 and 38
Vic. C. 2. It would thus be seen that the offences on high seas are
governed only by the Statutes of Parliament 12 and 13 Vic. confer
on colonial courts to try all offences which could have been tried
by the admiral. Section 1 of statute 23 and 24 Vic. C. 88 makes
statute 12 and 13 Vic. C. 96 applicable to India and Statute 37 and
38 Vic. C. 27 makes the offence punishable according to Indian Law.
19 Bom. L. R. 527