Vol. 15 · pages 161–165
As Free India's First Law Minister and Member of Opposition in Parliament, 1947–1956
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 161 (printed page 144)
144 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
whether it should be distributive voting or one man one vote
or cumulative voting or any other system. I have not the
slightest intention to deprive Parliament of its right to have
its determination upon that subject. In fact, as I said in my
opening speech yesterday and according to the statement made
yesterday by the Prime Minister, this Bill is not a complete
Bill itself. This Bill is to be followed by another Bill which
may be either called Conduct of Elections Bill or the Electoral
Bill. In that Bill, matters relating to the constituencies,
qualifications and disqualifications of candidates and matters
relating to the voting system will be dealt with and it will be
undoubtedly within the competence of Parliament to come to
a decision when that Bill is placed before the House, as to
what sort of system of constituency and voting they approve
of. Therefore, there is no desire at all to oust the jurisdiction
of Parliament at all. On the other hand, as my hon. friends
will remember, I myself am anxious that at every stage
in the delimitation of constituencies, Parliament should be
associated. As they know, I am making a provision in clause
13 that not only will the order of delimitation be placed
before Parliament as an information, but also I am going to
move an amendment that Parliament should have the right
to make suggestions and modifications as it likes provided
it wishes to do so within a stated priod of ten days or so.
In addition to that, there is also going to be an amendment
empowering the Speaker to appoint Committees of this House
to be associated with the work of delimiting constituencies,
the members to be drawn from that particular area. Having
regard to the statement which I have made, I think it is clear
that I have not the slightest desire to oust the jurisdiction
of Parliament. I am providing for placing the Order of
delimitation on the Table of the House with the right of the
House to make any changes they may like and in addition
there is a further provision that the Speaker will have the
right to appoint Committees to be associated with the work
of delimitation. I do not think that any Member have any
doubt that we have the fullest desire to have Parliament’s
decision on this matter. The only thing is that this Bill
PDF page 162 (printed page 145)
145PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES
happens to come first when, as a matter of fact, that Bill
might have come first. The point is that clause 6 of this Bill
which provides for delimitation will certainly not come into
operation until that other Bill has been passed. It is obviously
so, because, we are now, as you know, amending section 21
providing for a supplementary electoral roll which itself will
take a pretty long time and give us sufficient opportunity to
place that Bill before Parliament.
Shri Sondhi : Why not delete the clause when it is not
to come into operation.
Dr. Ambedkar : It should not be deleted.
*Shri Kesava Rao (Madras) : I have a little doubt
regarding sub-clause ( b) of clause 6. I am afraid the seats
reserved for scheduled castes and scheduled tribes will be
determined by the President after consultation with the
Election Commission. I am doubtful that the total number
reserved is not stated anywhere. Even in the Parliament and
in the Constituent Assembly it was many times stated that
the number should be fixed.
Dr. Ambedkar : It is there in the Constitution according to
the population. All that is necessary is to know the population.
As regards delimitation I have my own doubts ………
Mr. Speaker : Let not the hon. Member go into
administrative details. All that the House can do is to decide
the principles, leaving it to the authorities concerned to work
them out in practice. But, I myself was feeling one doubt about
Mr. A. P. Jain’s amendment and what was said by Pandit
Thakur Das Bhargava. I am not conversant with the discussions
in the Constituent Assembly nor with the discussions at
the informal meeting this morning. As I understand it, all
that the Members are anxious about is that, before any
constituencies are fixed or delimitation is effected, this House
must have an opportunity of examining it and expressing its
views on that; because, it is not possible to have all these
* P. D, Vol. 4, Part II, 20th April 1950, pp. 3064-65.
PDF page 163 (printed page 146)
146 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
constituencies mentioned as an appendix or a schedule to an
Act that the House might pass. As has been rightly pointed
by Mr. Krishnamachari, all that the law is expected to do is
to make a “provision” for such and such a thing. That does
not necessarily mean that all the details must be settled
here, in the House. The House may prescribe the legal
machinery by which a certain thing can be done. My difficulty
is that, I am not able fully to understand the point of view
of those who object. The object of the House seems to be to
have an opportunity to express its views. After all, any Bill
that comes before the House even in the manner in which
the hon. Member has suggested would be prepared by the
executive and will come in a ready and cut and dried form.
I see that Dr. Ambedkar proposes to move an amendment
to clause 13, and hon. Members will note that according to
that amendment, whatever is done by the President is subject
to such modifications as the Parliament may make. It is,
therefore, clear that whatever orders are passed are coming
again before the House for its scrutiny and the Parliament
will have a statutory right of suggesting modifications. It
will not be a matter for which Governement may or may not
find time, according to their sweet will. If any modification is
suggested by any Member, that modification must come before
the House and Government must find time for it.
Dr. Ambedkar : If you will permit me, Sit, I am going a
step further. The Parliament cannot merely do this postmortem,
so to say, at the fag end but what I am saying is that I shall
bring in a Bill in which all these matters will be dealt with
by law and Parliament will have an opportunity to express
its opinion upon it. It is a much greater opportunity that I
am proposing. Not having considered this matter properly
and thorougly I am not in a position to commit myself one
way or the other. But whatever the system of the electorate,
whatever the basis of voting, whatever the qualifications or
disqualifications of the candidates, all those matters will be
dealt with by a Bill which Government will bring forward
here long before the operation of clauses 5 and 6 will come
about…………..
PDF page 164 (printed page 147)
147PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES
Mr. Speaker : Apart from that I was also pointing out
that the House having got the right ……
Dr. Ambedkar : That is in addition to what the House
will do. I am doing something further than that. I am now
introducing an amendment to clause 13 to enable you to
appoint committees to work with the Election Commissioner
in the matter of the determination of the constituencies.
The further provision that I am making is this: that the
constituencies as will be set out in the order will be as
recommended by that Committee and not by the Election
Commission. I am cutting out by an amendment the Election
Commission. I am giving the Committee the direct authority
to do it.
Shri Kamath (Madhya Pradesh) : Will the Committee be
appointed or elected ?
Dr. Ambedkar : In such manner as the Speaker may
determine.
Pandit Thakur Das Bhargava : It may be that the
Committee and the Election Commission may decide in regard
to each State differently and may not arrive at a common
basis.
Dr. Ambedkar : As I said just now, I will bring in a
Bill to determine these matters and when the Bill is passed,
whatever law or whatever provision is made will be applied
uniformly throughout India or differently in different States
as Parliament chooses.
*Dr. Ambedkar : I stand by the assurance that I have
given that there will be a Bill. It will deal with both the
aspects : (1) the nature of the constituencies—whether they
are to be single-member or plural-member; and (2) what
should be the system of voting. As I said, we shall also deal
with the candidate, his qualifications and disqualifications.
I have no desire in any way to take away the power of
* P. D., Vol. 4, Part II, 20th April 1950, pp. 3068-71.
PDF page 165 (printed page 148)
148 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
Parliament and if I may say so with all respect, I disagree with
my hon. friend Mr. Santhanam who said that this was a matter
entirely to be relegated to the Election Commission. The Election
Commission is there merely to control and supervise the elections,
but the delimitation of constituencies is a matter for Parliament.
Mr. Speaker : Does Mr. Jain want me to put his amendment
to the House ?
Shri A. P. Jain : I just want ot say a few words.
Mr. Speaker : I think we have had enough discussion. It
will be a wrong procedure if I allow a person to speak over and
over again on the same amendment. If he wishes me to put his
amendment before the House, I shall do so.
Shri A. P. Jain : No, Sir, I do not want it to be put to the
vote of the House.
Shri J. R. Kapoor : In view of the assurance given by the Law
Minister, I do not wish mine also to be placed before the House.
Dr. Ambedkar : Sir, I have an amendment to clause 6. I
beg to move :
“In sub-clasue (2), omit ‘after consulting the Election Commission’.”
So that the House will understand its significance, I shall
read Clause 13. I have proposed an amendment to clause 13,
which reads thus :
For existing clause, substitute :
“13, Procedure for making orders under sections 6, 9 and 11. —
(1) As soon as may be after the commencement of this Act, there
shall be set up by the Speaker—
( a) in respect of each Part A State and Part B State other
than Jammu and Kashmir an Advisory Committee
consisting of not less than three, and not more than
seven Members of Parliament representing that State;
and
( b) in respect of each Part C State other than Bilaspur, Coorg
and the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, an Advisory
Committee consisting of the Member or Members of
Parliament representing that State.
(2) The Election Commissions shall, in consultation with the
Advisory Committee so set up in respect of each State, formulate