Vol. 15 · pages 441–445
As Free India's First Law Minister and Member of Opposition in Parliament, 1947–1956
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 441
No text on this page (it may be blank, a title page or an image).
PDF page 442
SECTION V
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGES
34. Representation of the People (Amendment) Bill … 427-508
PDF page 443
No text on this page (it may be blank, a title page or an image).
PDF page 444 (printed page 427)
427PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES
(34)
* REPRESENTATION OF THE PEOPLE
(AMENDMENT) BILL
* The Minister of Law (Dr. Ambedkar): I beg to move:
“That the Bill further to amend the Representation of the
People Act, 1950, be taken into consideration.”
This is a very short Bill and it seeks to amend the
Representation of the People Act, 1950 which was passed
by this House some time ago. The object of the Bill is to
provide for the representation in the House of the People for
the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes in Part C
States. As the House will remember under Articles 313 and
332, there is provision made by the Constitution itself for the
representation of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled
Tribes in Part A and Part B states. So far as Part C States
are concerned, the matter has been left to Parliament and
to the President. Article 82 of the Constitution says that so
far as the representation of the people in Part C States is
concerned, it shall be dealt with by Parliament and so far
as the administration of Part C States is concerned, that is
a matter which is left to be dealt with by Article 239. When
the People’s Representation Bill was before the House, it
should have, as a matter of propriety also contained the
provisions which are now included in this present Bill. But
unfortunately, Government at that time had not got sufficient
information as to the number of seats that were going to be
allotted to Part C States in the House of the People, nor were
they in possession of the tribes and the castes which were
to be included in the provisions relating to Part C States.
Consequently, these provisions had to be held back and they
are now brought forth before this House.
* P. D., Vol. 10., Part II, 18th April 1951, pp. 7021-39.
PDF page 445 (printed page 428)
428 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
There are really two points which require, I believe,
some explanation. As the House knows, there are altogether
ten Part C States. It has not been possible for Government
to provide representation for the Scheduled Castes and the
Scheduled Tribes in all the ten Part C States and the reason
is this. We have had to consider two different propositions.
One was whether the Part C States in which a provision was
to be made for the representation of the Scheduled Castes
and the Scheduled Tribes had sufficient number of seats, so
that if a seat was reserved for the Scheduled Caste or for
the Scheduled Tribe, the result would not be the complete
disenfranchisement of the general population. Obviously,
there are some States which are included in Part C States
where the total representation given to that particular State
is only one seat in the House of the People. For instance,
Bilaspur is one such State. Coorg is one such State where
one that is given. Obviously, it is not possible to apply the
principle of reservation in cases of that sort, where a seat
could be allotted to the Scheduled Castes, the result of which
would be total negation of the representation of the general
population. Therefore, in providing representation for the
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in Part C States, we
have had to select only those States where there is room for
both to be represented in the Lower House.
The second principle that we have had to take into
consideration was the totality of the population of the
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in any
particular Part C State. Where the population
was very small, we have not thought it proper to give any
representation. But, where the population is considerable
having regard to the total population, we have thought that
a seat might be given in those areas. Consequently, what the
Bill does is this. It reserves seats for the Scheduled Castes
in Delhi, Himachal Pradesh and Vindhya Pradesh, one seat
in each of these three Part C States. Here, the House will
see that there is no great resulting injustice for the simple
reason that Delhi has four seats, Himachal Pradesh has three
seats and Vindhya Pradesh has six seats. We have felt that
these States could well afford to allow one seat to be given
to the Scheduled Castes.
4-00 P.M.