Vol. 15 · pages 551–555
As Free India's First Law Minister and Member of Opposition in Parliament, 1947–1956
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 551 (printed page 534)
534 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
Shri Sidhva: I think it is a healthy suggestion that you
have made.
Shri Gautam: It will be very difficult for the House to
decide whether there is some connection between one clause
and the other. If you introduce this, then the tyranny of the
majority will start not today, but tomorrow. Therefore, as
protector of the privileges of this House, and especially of the
minorities, I would request you not to introduce this novel
procedure.
Mr. Deputy Speaker: Let me not be misunderstood. I
have nothing to say against the majority or the minority. I
have only made an appeal to the House irrespective of the
question of majority or minority.
Shri Kamath: It is very gratifying to hear Mr. Mohanlal
Gautam talk of the interests of the minority.
Mr. Deputy Speaker: At any rate, I hope Members will
bear my observation in mind and try to conclude before the
end of the day.
Shri Gautam: I congratulate the Government for
introducing the Bill, although after a long time. There is a
general impression in the country and also outside created by
the opponents of the Congress and other interested parties
that the Congress does not want to hold the elections. I
think the Government has got its difficulties; the Provincial
Governments have got their problems. But I can assure you
of one thing and that is that the Congress as a political party
has never been in favour of delaying the elections.
We do not want to delay the elections because we are
afraid of them. We want them to be completed as soon as
possible. There are certain difficulties which have prevented
Government from holding the elections earlier. There is
in some quarters a lurking suspicion that the elections might
be delayed a little further. I, Sir, would request Government
that the elections must be held according to the schedule in
November-December as announced by the President in his
address to this House and no further delay should be brooked.
11 A.M.
PDF page 552 (printed page 535)
535PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES
*Shri Gautam: ......Then I come to the last point
that I want to raise and that is about illegal practices.
Dr. Ambedkar has laboured very much to explain one point to
us which as the interruptions of the House showed was not
clear to many of us and that was with regard to the return
of election expenses......
Dr. Ambedkar: Not clear.
Shri Gautam: The clause reads as follows:
“The following shall be deemed to be illegal practices for
the purposes of this Act:—
(1) The incurring or authorisation by any person other than
a candidate or his agent of expenses on account of holding
any public meeting, or upon any advertisement, circular or
publication.”
Mark the words, it is not publication only. If a man
distributes the handbills of a candidate, it is circulation “or
in any other way whatsoever” and this opens the door. I
do not know to what extent and to what limit. The clause
further reads:
“or in any other way whatsoever, for the purpose of promoting
or procuring the election of the candidate, unless he is authorised
in writing so to do by the candidate.”
If I were a candidate, I think it will be impossible for
me......
An hon. Member: You are making an announcement.
** Babu Ramnarayan Singh (Bihar) (English translation
of the Hindi speech ) : I thank you, Sir......
Dr. Ambedkar: Speak in English.
Babu Ramnarayan: No. Sir, we are now a free nation.
Why should we remind ourselves of our slavery by speaking
in English ? I will therefore express myself in Hindi.
I very much appreciated one of the observations made by
Hon. Dr. Ambedkar. It was that the object of the laws that
*P. D., Vol. 11, Part II, 9th May 1951, p. 8375.
**Ibid., p. 8413.
PDF page 553 (printed page 536)
536 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
are being made would be such as may ensure that no
Government in the country may be able to corrupt the
Members of Parliament. This is a welcome thing but
some provision should also be there, and I think it is
very essential to see that the Government should not
be corrupt because if the Government are itself corrupt,
they would corrupt the Members also. It will certainly
happen. Therefore the aim should be that no opportunity
be made available to corrupt them which, in other words,
means that there should be no corrupt Government in the
country at all.
* Pandit Krishna Chandra Sharma : These
allegations are irrelevant in view of the fact that the other
party is not here to explain the matter.
Mr. Deputy Speaker: It relates to Congress elections.
Dr. Ambedkar: The matter is now placed in the hands
of the Election Commissioner under the Constitution. It
is not in the hands of Government.
Mr. Deputy Speaker: The Election Commission has
been made supreme and the Select Committee proceedings
show that they have given further powers in respect of
the notification of the dates and other things both for the
general elections as well as the bye-elections. The Election
Commission has been made more and more important.
Shri Kamath: He wants to support this salutary
change.
Mr. Deputy Speaker: But we are not enquiring into
the past. Let him come to this Bill.
** Pandit Krishna Chandra Sharma : ......Then I come
to the question of election expenses. As Prof. Shah said, most
of the expenses will be incurred either in propaganda and
*P.D. Vol. 11, Part II, 9th May 1951, p. 8415.
**Ibid., pp. 8460-61.
PDF page 554 (printed page 537)
537PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES
publicity or in carrying the voters to the booths. So far as
propaganda and publicity are concerned they would be done by
the party to which the candidate belongs. Situated as we are it
is very difficult for an individual to stand on his own account:
a candidate, I suppose must belong to one party or another
and that party will in course of time evolve its own method
of working. We might make mistakes in the beginning but
just as other people have evolved precise methods of working
we too are not likely to fall in devising proper methods of
propaganda and publicity. But I do not agree with the Hon.
Law Minister that expenses incurred on propaganda on a
party basis would be a part of the election expenses incurred
by the candidate...
The Minister of Law (Dr. Ambedkar): I did not say
that—I said just the opposite.
Pandit Krishna Chandra Sharma: Then it is all right.
The election expenses of a candidate must be confined to
expenses incurred with regard to that candidate, which would
be incurred mostly by himself, his agent or on his behalf by
his friends. So, the question of the expenses coming to large
sums, as Prof. Shah fears, will not arise because among other
things, the polling booths will be easy of access to all the
voters which will eliminate heavy expenses......
*Dr. C. D. Pande (Uttar Pradesh): Before I take up the
provisions of this Bill. I should like to make a reference to
the compliment that has been paid by Dr. Ambedkar to the
Members of this House. He referred to them as chorus girls.
Dr. Ambedkar: I am sorry. I think it is quite wrong to
say that I referred to the House. My observations were of a
general character; they had nothing to do with the House at all.
Shri R. Velayudhan: It was not about the House.
Dr. C. D. Pande: If he did not mean that......
Mr. Deputy Speaker: He did not want Members of the
House to be mere chorus girls when they are elected.
*P.D., Vol. 11, Part II, 10th May 1951, pp. 8464-65.
PDF page 555 (printed page 538)
538 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
Dr. C. D. Pande : It comes nearly to the same thing.
Dr. Ambedkar: Not at all. It refers to future Members.
Dr. C. D. Pande : Anyhow, when I heard that remark......
Dr. Deshmukh: He has not discovered any of such
characters here so far.
Dr. C. D. Pande: I felt with some Members of the House
at least that that remark was not a happy one, and the remark
if it was appropriate, let me extend the simile further. What
he said was that the Members were chorus girls. If we are
all chorus girls, then he is the matron of that establishment.
Shri Syamnandan Sahaya (Bihar): You may be one ;
we are not.
Dr. C. D. Pande : He is the matron of that establishment.
Shri R. Velayudhan: Is it not an insinuation Sir?
Shri Rajagopalachari: If we talk again and again about
chorus girls perhaps they may object too!
Mr. Deputy Speaker: As a matter of fact, some of the
lady Members of this House expressed to me that I ought
to have intervened and said that a reference ought not to
be made to chorus girls. They are very touchy about these
matters now-a-days.
Dr. Ambedkar : I apologise if they have taken it in offence.
This is what I said : if we did not do certain things, then what
might follow will be like that. I had not the sightest idea to
refer to the Members of this House. I was referring to the
result that will follow if certain precautions are not taken.
Babu Ramnarayan Singh (Bihar): You were right.
Dr. C. D. Pande: If he did not mean it, I leave it at that.
The main provisions of this Bill have been throughly
discussed by previous speakers and I would touch only a few
main points. To me, the most vital point is the use of the
national flag in the election campaign in this country in which
the Congress takes part wherein the use of the national flag
could be avoided or should be avoided. The distinction between
the national flag as accepted by Government and as used by
the organisation is very slight and people are really confused.