Vol. 17, Part I · pages 121–125
Dr. B. R. Ambedkar and His Egalitarian Revolution — Struggle for Human Rights
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 121 (printed page 96)
96 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
C. The Depressed Classes in the Punjab shall have the
benefit of the Punjab Land Alienation Act extended to them.
D. Right of Appeal shall lie to the Governor or GovernorGeneral for redress of prejudicial action or neglect of interest
by any Executive Authority.
E. The Depressed Classes shall have representation not
less than set forth in the Annexure.
SPECIAL CLAIMS OF THE ANGLO-INDIAN COMMUNITY
A. Generous interpretation of the claims admitted by SubCommittee No. VIII (Services) to the effect that in recongnition
of the peculiar position of the community special consideration
should be given to the claim for public employment, having
regard to the maintenance of an adequate standard of living.
B. The right to administer and control its own educational
institutions, i.e., European education, subject to the control
of the Minister.
Provisions for generous and adequate grants-in-aid and
scholarships on the basis of present grants.
C. Jury rights equal to those enjoyed by other communities
in India unconditionally of proof of legitimacy and descent
and the right of accused persons to claim trial by either a
European or an Indian Jury.
SPECIAL CLAIMS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY
A. Equal rights and privileges to those enjoyed by Indianborn subjects in all industrial and commercial activities.
B. The maintenance of existing rights in regard to procedure
of criminal trials, and any measure or bill to amend, alter
or modify such a procedure cannot be introduced except with
the previous consent of the Governor-General.
Agreed by—
HIS HIGHNESS THE AGA KHAN (Muslims),
DR. AMBEDKAR (Depressed Classes),
RAO BAHADUR PANNIR SELVAM (Indian Christians),
SIR HENRY GIDNEY (Angol-Indians),
SIR HUBERT CARR (Europeans).
PDF page 122 (printed page 97)
97ROLE OF ......................... INDIAN DEMOCRACY
ANNEXURE
REPRESENTATION IN LEGISLATURES
Figures in brackets=Population basis 1931 figures and depressed percentages as per Simon Report.
Stength of
Chamber
Hindus
Muslims Christians Sikhs Anglo- Indians Tribal etc. Europeans Caste Depressed Total
Census
ALL India (1931)
(47.5) (19)* (66.5) (21.5)
Upper .. 200 101 20 121 67 1 6 1 .. 4
Lower .. 300 123 45 168 100 7 10 3 .. 12
(48.9) (13.4) (62.3) (34.8)
Assam .. 100† 38 13 51 35 3 .. 1 .. 10
(18.3) (24.7) (43) (54.9)
Bengal .. 200 38 35 73 102 2 .. 3 .. 20
(67.8) (14.5) (82.3) (11.3)
Bihar and Orissa 100 51 14 65 25 1 .. 1 3 5
* Represents percentage in Governor’s Provinces of British India.
† Population figures exclude Tribal Areas.
PDF page 123 (printed page 98)
98 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
ANNEXURE—contd.
REPRESENTATION IN LEGISLATURES
Figures in brackets=Population basis 1931 figures and depressed percentages as per Simon Report.
Stength of
Chamber
Hindus
Muslims Christians Sikhs Anglo- Indians Tribal etc. Europeans Caste Depressed Total
(68) (8) (76) (20)
Bombay .. 200 88 28 116 66 2 .. 3 .. 13
On Sind being separated weightage of Musalmans in Bombay to be on the same footing as to the Hindus in the
N.W.F.P.
(63.1) (23.7) (86.8) (44)
C.P. .. 100 58 20 78 15 1 .. 2 2 2
(71.3) (15.4) (86.7) (7.1) (3.7)
Madras .. 200 102 40 142 30 14 .. 4 2 8
(15.1) (13.5) (28.6) (56.5) (13)
Panjab .. 100 14 10 24 51 1.5 20 1.5 .. 2
(58.1) (26.4) (84.5) (14.8)
U.P. .. 100 44 20 64 30 1 .. 2 .. 3
Sind and N.W.F.P. Weightage similar to that enjoyed by the Musalmans in the Provinces in which they constitute a
minority of the population shall be given to the Hindu minority in Sind and to the Hindu and Sikh minorities in the N.W.F.P.
PDF page 124 (printed page 99)
99ROLE OF ......................... INDIAN DEMOCRACY
Explanatory Memorandum to the said
Memorandum
1. The suggested details for community representation
have not been agreed by the Hindus or the Sikhs, but the
full representation claimed by the latter in the Central
Legislature is provided for.
2. The proposed distribution of seats for the different
minorities constitutes a whole scheme and the detailed
proposals cannot be separated one from another.
3. This distribution of seats follows the principle that
in no case is the majority community to be reduced to the
position of a minority of even equality.
4. No representaion is provided for Commerce, Landlords,
Industry, Labour, etc. It being assumed that these seats
are ultimately communal and that communities desiring
special representation for these interests may do so out of
the communal quota.
5. The allowance of 33½ per cent representation to
Muslims in the Central Legislature is based on the
assumption that 26 per cent shall be from British India and
at least 7 per cent by convention out of the quota assigned
to the Indian States.
6. In the Punjab the suggested common sacrifice by the
Muslims, Caste Hindus and the Depressed Classes, would
permit of a weightage of 54 per cent, being given to the
Sikhs, giving them representation of 20 per cent, in the
Legislature.
7. The proposals may be taken as being acceptable to
well over 115 millions of people, or about 46 per cent of
the population of India.” *
The British Premier tried in his own way to bring the Indian
delegates to a frame of mind for a settlement. The Premier’s
daugther gave a party to choice delegates. The Maharaja of Baroda,
*This appeared as appendix III in the original proceeding of the Federal
Structure Committee and Minorities Committee, Pp. 1394-99.
PDF page 125 (printed page 100)
100 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
Dr. Ambedkar, Sir Mirza Ismail, Jinnah, Tambe and few others
attended it. The British Premier took some of the delegates to
his country home at Chequers. They had a talk there relating
to the Indian problem, but there, too, they could not come to a
settelment.
The Minorities Sub-Committee submitted its report to the
Conference. The last paragraph of that report recorded that “the
Minorities and Depressed Classes were definite in their assertion
that they could not consent to any self-governing constitution of
India unless their demands were met in a reasonable manner.”
Like Joshi, Jadhav and Paul, Dr. Ambedkar dissented from
the proposals of the Franchise Sub-Committee as in their opinion
the proposals were inadequate, and they pleaded for immediate
introduction of adult franchise. In the written speech, which he
could not make for want of time, Dr. Ambedkar warned the British
Government that it would be betraying the Depressed Classes if
by limiting the franchise the Labour Government left them to
the mercy of those who had taken no interest in their welfare.
Such was his sincerity and devotion to the problem and to
the welfare of his people that Dr. Ambedkar worked day and
night, sought interviews, gave interviews, supplied information,
and even addressed a meeting of some Members of the British
Parliament to acquaint them fully with the problem of the
Untouchables. He took every opportunity of contributing articles
to foreign journals, of issuing statements to the foreign press
and of addressing meetings in London with the sole object of
exposing the intolerable humiliations and unbelievable suffering
under which the Depressed Classes were groaning in India for
ages. In appeal after appeal to the Press he said that the cause of
the Untouchables in India needed the support of the enlightened
world. He, therefore, urged that it was the sacred duty of the
people at large to help the solution of their problem on the basis
of humanity!
The result was that the world came to know for the first time
that the fate of the Untouchables in India was worse than that
of the Negroes in America. The appeal moved some of the British
leaders and consequently a deputation consisting of some Members