Vol. 17, Part I · pages 501–505
Dr. B. R. Ambedkar and His Egalitarian Revolution — Struggle for Human Rights
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 501
APPENDIX - X
REACTIONS ON THE STATEMENT DATED
19-6-1936 ISSUED BY DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR
ON CONVERSION
I
Dr. Moonje’s Letter to Mr. Rajah
Dr. Moonje wrote the following letter dated. New Delhi
30th June 1936 to Rao Bahadur M. C. Rajah :—
“Dear Sir,
On urgent calls from Bombay friends and also from
Shreeman Seth Jugal Kishore Birla with the concurrence
of Dr. Ambedkar, I had occasion to go to Bombay on the
18th instant. There Dr. Ambedkar had long conversations
with me for three days. Eventually a fomula for amicable
settlement of his revolt against Hinduism was drafted.
Dr. Ambedkar entirely agrees with it.
The formula is as follows :—
“If Dr. Ambedkar were to announce his decision that he and
his followers are prepared to embrace Sikhism in preference to
Islam and Christianity and that he shall honestly and sincerely
co-operate with the Hindus and the Sikhs in propagating
their culture and in counteracting the Muslim movement for
drawing the Depressed Classes into the Muslim fold, the Hindu
Mahasabha will be prepared, in view of their having agreed to
remain within the Hindu Culture, to make an announcement
that it will not object:—
(1) To the conversion of the Depressed Classes to Sikhism;
(2) To the inclusion of the Neo-Sikhs in the list of the
Scheduled Castes; and
(3) To the enjoyment by the Depressed Classes of the
political rights of the Poona Pact by free competition between
the Non-Sikhs and the Neo-Sikh Depressed Classes as
provided for under the Poona Pact.”
PDF page 502 (printed page 477)
477REACTIONS ON.....................CONVERSION
From Bombay I have come here just this morning for
consultation on it with friends before formally putting it before
the Hindu Mahasabha for its consideration. I am trying to
see Pandit Malaviyaji and if possible also H. H. the Maharaja
of Patiala. It is a very delicate matter. I have, therefore, to
request you to kindly think over it and let me have your
opinion in the matter. Until we decide one way or the other,
the matter will be kept strictly private and confidential.
Awaiting your reply.
Yours Sincerly,
(Sd./—) B. S. Moonje.
P. S.—“I am enclosing also a copy of the statement of his
case handed over to me by Dr. Ambedkar for your perusal.
Please let me have your reply to my Nagpur address.” 1
II
“Mr, Rajah’s Reply to Dr. Moonje
I have already expressed my view about Dr. Ambedkar’s
proposal that the Depressed Classes should give up Hinduism
and embrace some other religion. I make a distinction between
conversion—which is a spiritual change and migration from
one community to another for social, economic and political
reasons.
Dear Dr. Moonje, you will excuse my saying that you
view the whole problem of Depressed Classes, in view of
Dr. Ambedkar’s proposal, as one of the communal migration
and not as a religious problem. One would expect the
President of the Hindu Mahasabha to view it as a religious
problem and not merely as a political problem, without
even looking at it as a social and economic problem. One
can understand your concern if as President of the Hindu
Mahasabha you placed the spiritual welfare of the Depressed
Classes first and foremost and thought of the social and
economic welfare next and lastly thought of them as a
political factor. Your solicitude for the place of the Depressed
Classes in the political scheme not only exposes the interested
1 : The Bombay Chronicle, dated 8th August 1936.
PDF page 503 (printed page 478)
478 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
nature of your concern for these classes, but is like placing
the cart before the horse. One would expect you as President
of the Hindu Mahasabha to ameliorate the social condition of
the Depressed Classes by removing civic and social disabilities
of these classes, not to speak of securing for them the right
of worship in Hindu temples on an equal footing with other
worshippers, and to further the Harijan movement started
by Gandhiji all over the country. Instead of doing this, what
is it, that you are doing ? You are dissecting the Depressed
Classes and affiliating them religiously to the Sikhs while
retaining them politically as Hindus.
The whole thing seems to me not to be conceived in the
interest of the Depressed Classes but on the other hand to
be planned in the communal interests of the Hindus and the
Sikhs. We are not sheep and cattle to be bartered away in this
fashion, driven from one political fold to another as a result
of a bargain between the leaders of different communites.
We want to remain so solid community moving of our own
accord in the direction of progress and this we can best do
by not throwing away our birth rights as Hindus but by
remaining within Hinduism and changing it so as to make
it more comfortable not only to our communities which are
suffering from similar liabilities, though our hardships are
greater and more palpable. It is not our purpose to weaken
the Hindu community but to strenghthen it by reforming
it from within. We do not wish to be pawns in the game of
communal conflicts and competition.
Your proposal involves of electoral fortunes of Hindus,
Sikhs and Muslims. If you want us to shift religion from
the Hindu fold, we shall have to choose religion between
the Sikhs and the Muslims who are the bidders for our
communal migration, wrongly called conversion. Why should
we antagonise and stand arrayed against Muslims? They are
our brothers as much as the Sikhs and the Hindus. If the
Depressed Classes all to become Sikhs and call themselves
Neo-Sikhs, it will create all over the India a Sikh-HinduMuslim problem, as in the Punjab, made move complicated by
the fact that the so-called Neo-Sikh belongs to the Depressed
Class even among Sikhs.
PDF page 504 (printed page 479)
479REACTIONS ON.....................CONVERSION
This question of conversion or the communal migration
as a move of the political chess board does not disturb us
much in South India. We are content to work under the
Poona Pact, partly as a separate electorate and partly with
a joint electorate preserving our status with the Hindus both
religiously and politically. I would therefore be no party even
to the political manipulations which are proposed in your
letter. I would urge the Hindu Mahasabha to address itself
to the task of making easy for the Depressed Classes to stay
within Hinduism and Hindu Society instead of arranging for
the ticket for entering them to some far off destination. As
the question you raise is likely to rouse a lot of discussion.
I reserve to myself the right to publish my reply when the
occasion arises.
III
Rajah Backed
Mr. C. Rajagopalchari writing to Rao Bahadur Rajah
said :—
“I have your note and enclosures. I read through the
Correspondence. I would not be too strong language to call the
whole thing a diabolical proposal. I am glad, you have sent the
correspondence to Mahatmaji. I am glad, you have replied in the
terms you have done and summarily rejected the Idea.” 1
IV
RAJBHOJ REPLIES TO DR. AMBEDKAR
Poona Pact Benefits not for Runaways from Hinduism
“The Poona Pact does not make any provision for converts
from Hinduism, and even if some of the Harijan community
embraced Sikhism or any other religion in a body, it is not
within the power of the Poona Pact signatories to retain
for those converts any of the advantages secured under it,”
says Mr. P. N. Rajbhoj, Harijan leader and Secretary of
the All India Depressed Classes league, in a statement on
Dr. Moonje’s plan. Mr. Rajbhoj adds that the Poona Pact
was specially intended to give the utmost concession to
1 : The Bombay Chronicle, dated 8th August 1936.
PDF page 505 (printed page 480)
480 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
the members of the Depressed Classes, so that they
remained an integral part of the Hindu-fold. There was no
question of applying it to those that left or were leaving
the Hindu-fold.
Dr. Ambedkar never once raised the question of
conversion at the time of the Pact. I think the cry is now
raised to secure more concessions, says he.
Logical Absurdity
Proceeding, Mr. Rajbhoj asks if new converts from
Hinduism are to be given the benefits derived under
the Poona Pact why not the old converts who may for
political, if not religious, reasons want them ? He says that
there are large number of Depressed Classes who have
embraced other faiths, but have not been able to throw
off the disabilities attached to the Harijan Community,
and mentions the case of the Christians in some parts of
Madras. Why should concessions and benefits obtained by
those who laboured under disadvantages and difficulties
be given to those who did not want those disadvantages,
but only the benefits of the labours of others.
The Poona leader adds, “the formula is a vicious formula
and will lead to more complications and endless trouble. It
should not be accepted by the Hindus or by anybody. We
are Hindus or not Hindus. If we elect to remain within
the Hindu-fold, we are entitled to our right and privileges
as Hindus, and once we leave the Fold, we can have no
claim.”
Refuting the statement that the Hindus have not made
any sacrifice by accepting the Poona Pact, Mr. Rajbhoj says
that instead of the 71 seats given to the Depressed Classes
under the Communal Award, the Pact gave them 148 seats.
Concluding Mr. Rajbhoj asserts that the conversion idea has
no universal appeal among the Harjijan community. Even
in Maharashtra only the Mahars favoured such a view,
but the Chamars were solidly opposed to any conversion.
There was no support to the idea in other provinces and
he was surprised how the Hindu leaders were involved
into it.” 1
1 : The Bombay Chronicle, dated 15th August 1936.