Vol. 17, Part II · pages 416–420

39 AMBEDKAR’S RECIPE FOR MAHARASHTRA Voice of the People The communications I have received indicate that the Maharashtrians are not quite satisfied with the proposals that I recently made in the Rajya Sabha over the MaharashtraBombay issue. They are afraid that in Bombay City they may not get the majority. The Gujeratis, on the other hand, realise that with 15 per cent of Gujerati population in a house of 100 they would not have more than two to four seats. Both the communities will remain helpless and chafe at each other. I, therefore, make another suggestion. The Maharashtra State, I suggest, should be divided into two States, one of which should consist of—(1) Greater Bombay ; (2) Thana district; (3) Colaba ; (4) Ratnagiri ; (5) Kolhapur and (6) Marathi-speaking parts of Surat district, Belgaum and Karwar districts. The dividing line is Sahyadri mountain. The advantages of this division are :—(1) it can give Maharashtrians majority over Bombay through North Bombay ; (2) it is a separate cultural unit; (3) it is a separate linguistic unit and (4) the total area of this unit is 19,800 sq. miles with a total population of 9,067,413, which makes it a sizable State. The people are both maritime and martial. I do not see why the Brahmins are insisting on United Maharashtra. Even then, there will be two rival claimants for power, Shri. B. S. Hiray and Shri Ramrao M. Deshmukh. Possibly, Dr. Punjabrao Deshmukh may have his own view. There is another point which is raising dificulty and that relates to the capital of the second division of Maharashtra. The Deccan Brahmins want Poona, while the present Madhya Pradesh Brahmins want Nagpur. Others suggest the third alternative of the Legislature’s session being held alternately at these two cities. I condemn all the three alternatives. I am sure that under the name of United Maharashtra we are not calling Peshwai back. I suggest

392 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES the capital of United Maharashtra be Aurangabad. Adjacent to it is Daulatabad which was the capital of Maharashtra until it was destroyed by the Muslims. It has a fine climate. The question must be decided immediately. Whatever the Congress High Command may say, there is not the slightest chance of a Gujerati voting for a Maharashtrian candidate and the Maharashtrian voting for the Gujerati Candidate. Dr. B. R. Ambedkar (New Delhi)” 1 zz 1 : The Free Press Journal, dated 31st May 1956.

SECTION IV INSTITUTIONS, ORGANISATIONS AND THEIR CONSTITUTIONS

1 BAHISHKRIT HITKARINI SABHA Dr. Ambedkar organized a meeting on 9th March 1924 at Damodar Hall, Bombay, with objectives to establish a Central Institute which would place the grievances of the Untouchables before the Government and after many discussions, Central Institute was established. He proposed the name of the Institute as ‘Bahishkrit Hitkarini Sabha’ which was supported by all. The Vow of the Institute was decided “Educate, Agitate and Organize” and was approved unanimously. Mr. Sir Chimanlal Harilal Setalvad, LL.,D. became the President of Bahishkrit Hitkarini Sabha and Mr. Never Nissim, J. P. was Vice President, Mr. Rustamji Jinwala, Solicitor, Mr. G. K. Nariman, Dr. R. P. Paranjape, Dr. V. P. Chavan, Mr. B. G. Kher, Solicitor, were included in the Committee. Dr. B. R. Ambedkar was the Chairman of the Managing Committee while Mr. S. N. Shivatarkar, Secretary and Mr. N. T. Jadhav was Treasurer. The Bahishkrit Hitkarini Sabha was established on 20th July 1924 and was registered under the Act XXI of 1860. Dr. Ambedkar framed constitution of this institution. Following is the text of the constitution.— Editors. BAHISHKRIT HITKARINI SABHA (Registered under the Society Registration Act) Rules of Constitution Established 20th July 1924 Head Office Damodar Hall, Parel Bombay - 12. Printed at the Co-operative Printing Press, 91, B, Parel Road, Near Venus Cinema, Chinchpokli, Bombay-12.