Vol. 17, Part III · pages 421–425
Dr. B. R. Ambedkar and His Egalitarian Revolution — Speeches
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 421 (printed page 392)
392 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
The decisions of the Cabinet Mission seemed to wipe out
the Scheduled Castes as a separate political entity and that
without political sefeguards the Scheduled Castes appeared to
me to be doomed. There was complete darkness before me. That
is the reason why I have not made any statement.
In reply to (2) I said :
It is true I have been an opponent and a ciritic of the
Congress. At the same time, I do not believe in opposition for the
sake of opposition. There ought to be the spirit of co-operation
where we can gain something by co-operation. I thought there
would be no use fighting against the Congress. I, therefore,
decided to co-operate and by co-operation we got some safeguards
in the Constitution which we might not otherwise have got and
gave some instances to substantiate my argument.
With regard to my joining the Cabinet : I said there were
two reasons which prevailed upon me to accept the offer—
(i) the offer was without any condition : (ii) one could serve
the interests of the Scheduled Castes better from within the
Government than from without.
I said that the Scheduled Castes had no fear of bad laws
being made to their prejudice. What they had to fear about
was bad administration. This bad administration was due to
the absence of men belonging to the Scheduled Castes in the
administration.
The Administration was unsympathetic to the Scheduled
Castes because it was maintained wholly by caste Hindu
officers who were partial to the caste Hindus in the villages,
who exacted begar from the Scheduled Castes, and practised
upon them tyranny and oppression day in and day out. This
tyranny and oppression could be averted only if more of the
Scheduled Castes could find places in the civil service. This
can be done better by being inside the Government rather than
remaining outside.
In regard to third point, I said that their is no use joining
the Congress. Safety lies in having two parties. There must
be an opposition to criticise the Government. The Government
may otherwise easily become dictator. It is a house which is
burning. There are many inside the Congress who want to form
an opposition, the necessity of which they feel quite strongly.
PDF page 422 (printed page 393)
393ORGANISE.........................PROGRAMME
Secondly, the Congress itself is getting divided. The
Socialists have gone out of it. How big they will grow one
cannot say now. There are possibilities of their getting quite
big. Hereafter, there will be two parties: (1) Congress and
(2) Socialists—and the question is not whether we should
join the Congress. The question is whether we should join
the Congress or the Socialists.
I said that my advice is that you should form a third
party so that the Scheduled Castes may be able to hold the
balance and thereby obtain bargaining power. There is no
use joining any political party as its mere camp-followers. If
it gives anything, it merely gives office. It cannot give power.
Your conference has just now passed a resolution
condemning the Pant Government for giving you only ten per
cent reservation in the services when on a purely population
basis you are entitled to something like 22%. The reason why
Mr. Pant does not give you your full quota, is because for his
majority in the United Provinces Assembly he is not depended
upon you—and that can be only when you are united into a
separate organisation worthy of negotiation—you can demand
22%, and he will have to give it to you.
I then turned to the question of unity between the
Scheduled Castes and the so-called Backward Classes. This I
did at the request of the leaders of the Backward Classes who
were present at the Conference. I said it was a pity that the
two classes whose needs were commn did not join together.
The reason was that the Backward Classes did not like to
associate themselves with the Scheduled Castes because they
were afraid that such an association will bring themselves
down to the level of the Scheduled Castes.
I said that I was not anxious to establish interdining
and intermarriage between the Scheduled Castes and the
Backward Classes. They may well remain separate social
entities. There is no reason why they should not join hands
to form a political party to remove their backward condition.
I pointed out how the Scheduled Castes have improved their
condition by playing their part in the politics of the country
and there is no reason why the Backward Classes should not
do the same.
PDF page 423 (printed page 394)
394 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
I said that the Scheduled Castes and the Backward Classes
form majority of the population of the country. There is no
reason why they should not rule this country. All that is
necessary is to organize for the purpose of capturing political
power—which is your own because of adult suffrage. People do
not seem to buck up courage because they are overwhelmed
by the belief that the Congress Government is there forever.
I said, this is a wrong impression. In a popular democracy
no Government is permanent and not even the Government
established by the two of the tallest Congressmen, Pandit
Nehru and Sardar Patel. If you organize, you can even capture
that Government.
I am sure, the reader will notice that any suggestion made
that I attacked the Congress Organization or my colleagues
is a travesty of facts.”
zz
PDF page 424
114
PROGRESS OF A COMMUNITY ALWAYS
DEPENDS UPON EDUCATION
At Manmad, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar was presented with a
purse on January 15, 1949*. “Speaking on the occasion, he
declared,
that his people would establish real socialism in the land
under the rule of peasants and workers. He also impressed
upon his audience that the progress of a community always
depended upon how they advanced in education.” 1
zz
* As per Janata, dated 22nd January 1949, the programme was held
on Sunday the 16th January 1949—Editors.
1 : Keer, P. 410.
PDF page 425
115
THE HINDU CODE WAS A RIGHT STEP
TOWARDS A CIVIL CODE
Students Parliament of Siddarth College had organised a Student
Parliament on Wednesday, 11th January 1950. Coinciding the
presence of Dr. B. R. Ambedkar in Bombay. He was called specially
to talk on ‘Hindu Code Bill.’ The programme was arranged in
Sundarabai Hall. Even though the programme was at 9 a. m. the
hall was full to its capacity by 8 a. m. only. Many outside dignitories
were present to listen to Dr. B. R. Ambedkar. A special arrangement
of loud speakers was made.1
In his speech Dr. B. R. Ambedkar said,
“It would be wrong to describe the Hindu Code Bill as either
radical revolutionary. He said that the Bill, while according sanction
to the new ways of progress, did not oppose the orthodox practices.
He further stated that the new Republican Constitution of India had
given a positive direction that Government should endeavour to
prepare a Civil Code for the benefit of the country as a whole. The
purpose of the Hindu Code Bill was, he explained, to codify and modify
certain branches of the Hindu Law. Dwelling upon its significance,
he said that it was beneficial from the point of the country’s oneness
that the same set of laws should govern the Hindu social and religious
life. He further told his audience that the Hindu laws were being
revised not because the Hindus were a weak people to resist its
revival but for uniformity’s sake. The Hindu Code was a right step
towards a Civil Code. The laws should be easily understandable and
be applied to all society irrespective of regional barriers. Moreover,
a Hindu was free to adopt anybody from the Hindu society and he
could make a will denying inheritance to his daughter.
As regards the authority under which the Code was drafted,
he said that the modifications proposed were based on the Hindu
Shastras and Smritis. The property was governed by Dayabhag
system ; the child belonged to the caste of the father under
Pitrisavarnya ; divorce was supported by Kautilya and Parashara
Smriti; and women’s rights to property were supported by Brihaspati
Smriti” he concluded.” 2
zz
1. : Janata, dated 14th January 1950.
2. : Keer, Pp. 417—418.