Vol. 17, Part III · pages 431–435
Dr. B. R. Ambedkar and His Egalitarian Revolution — Speeches
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 431
118
RELIGION NO LONGER BE INHERITED BUT
BE EXAMINED RATIONALLY BY EVERYBODY
“A Dramatic development of great national importance and
interest throughout South-East Asia took place in the capital
New Delhi; tonight, the May 2,1950 when Dr. B. R. Ambedkar,
India’s Law Minister, called upon 70 million Harijans to embrace
Buddhism, speaking at the triple anniversary of Lord Buddha
at a crowded meeting.
Later, Dr. Ambedkar told the “Bharat” representative that
he was on his way to embracing Buddhism. Mrs. Ambedkar was
present at the meeting.
It is also authoritatively learnt that about 15 Harijans will
embrace Buddhism in Delhi tomorrow. Similar directives, it is
learnt, have been sent to Dr. Ambedkar’s follwers all over India.
Yesterday, the actual day of Trinity-birthday, “Parinirvana”
day, the day of death of Lord Buddha, Dr. Ambedkar went to
the local Vihar to pay his respects and homage to Lord Buddha.
According to a high Buddhist Bikkhu, Dr. Ambedkar prayed for
Buddham Saranam gacchami
Dhammam Saranam gacchami
Sangham Saranam gacchami
He also accepted five tenets of Buddhism, all generally
interpreted as near solemnisation.
Buddhist Renaissance
A ranking Buddhist Bhikkhu who was present while
Dr. Ambedkar was making his speech, said that now India had
attained freedom. Buddhism must come to its own. Emphasising
the political significance of the possible Buddhist renaissance in
India, he declared that India would require Buddhism to guard
her freedom and spiritual strength.
Dr. Ambedkar, in his 30 minutes speech in flawless Hindi,
emphatically asserted that Buddhist renaissance had again
commenced in India. He supported this assertion by pointing out
that the President of the Republic had to approach Buddhism for
the symbol over free India’s national flag Ashoka Chakra, finding
nothing from a search into Brahminism. Buddhism again came
PDF page 432 (printed page 403)
403RELIGION NO..................EVERYBODY
forward to furnish to the Republic her emblem of the three
lions, and when the first President of the Republic was being
sworn in, at that history making occasion, idol not of any of
the countless Hindu Gods or Goddesses but of the Lord Buddha
was installed to record the event, added Dr. Ambedkar.
Neither Rama, nor Krishna, infact no God matched the
Lord Buddha, he said. No greater seer and leader would be
born, Dr. Ambedkar declared.
Dr. Ambedkar recalled several instances from Ramayana
and Mahabharat and questioned the greatness of Ramachandra
and Lord Krishna who were “alleged to have behaved that
way.” He said Hinduism propounded the twin theory of one
truth and one’s love for one’s own as bigotry which shirked
disputes and sought to maintain preponderance of its following
intact.
He accused Brahmins of having securedly held all the rights
except that of Crown which incidentally took the wearer to
hell according to Hindu shastra. He asked, how could that
religion be loved by those tens of millions on whom perpetual
condemnation was perpetrated ?
Time had arrived, he declared, when religion should no
longer be inherited from father to son like goods and chattels,
but should be examined rationally by everybody before personal
acceptance.
Dr. Ambedkar made it clear that he did not believe as
Socialists and Communists did, that religion was unnecessary.
He stated categorically, “I believe that religion is necessary
for the mankind. When religion ends the society would perish
too. After all no Government can safeguard and discipline
mankind as niti or dharma can”, Dr. Ambedkar added.
Burma’s Ambassador, Sir Maung Gyee, who presided over
the meeting, stated that the world which was in pain and
trouble would find peace, and solace in Buddhism. An official
of the Mahabodhi Society declared the Society’s rejoicing over
the fact that “Dr. Ambedkar has joined our ranks”.
“Dr. Ambedkar is arriving in Bombay tomorrow.” 1
zz
1. : The Bharat, dated 3rd May 1950.
PDF page 433
119
NON-BELIEVERS SHOULD BE CONVERTED
TO THE EIGHT-FOLD PATH
The Conference of the World Fellowship of Buddhists
was held at Candy (Ceylon) from 25th May to 6th June
1950. Dr. B. R. Ambedkar attended the Conference.
On 26th May 1950 the representatives of 27 countries
came together in the ‘Temple of the Truth’ to discuss the
subject of Revival of Buddhism. The resolution regarding
brotherhood in the world was passed in the Conference.
Thereafter Dr. B. R. Ambedkar addressed the Conference.1
Dr. Ambedkar in his speech said,
“I am an interested observer, not a delegate. I came
here with some very serious purposes. You probably know
that there are people in India who thought the time had
come when an effort might be made to revive Buddhism
in India. I am one of them. The definite objects of my visit
are first, to see Buddhist Ceremonial. Ceremonial is an
important part of religion. Whatever rationalists might say,
ceremonial is a very essential thing in religion. By coming
here I thought I would be able to see the ritual that formed
part and parcel of Buddhism.
Secondly, I wish to find out to what extent the religion
of the Buddha is observed here in its pristine purity and to
what extent His Gospel is encrusted by superstition, with
beliefs incongruous with Buddhism and Buddha’s doctrines.
My third objective is to find out to what extent the
Order of Bhikkhus as established by Buddha has been
of service to the community and whether that Order is
merely engaged in maintaining what is called “purity
of life” for itself, or whether it is engaged in serving
the laity, advising and making it perfect in the way
the Buddha wished it to be. I am interested in finding
out to what extent the religion of Buddha is a living
1. : Dalit Bandhu, dated 28th May 1950.
PDF page 434 (printed page 405)
405NON-BELIEVERS....................PATH
force or whether it is something which exists by reason of the
fact that the people of this country happen to be Buddhists
in the traditional sense of the word and having inherited it
merely passed it from one generation to another, whether
there was the dynamics of religion so far as the country is
concerned. The best way I could find out if religion is static or
that it has momentum and is dynamic is to study and observe
the interest the younger generation of the country displayed,
to what extent they devoted their time to religion, to what
extent their belief in religion was giving them salvation ( not
in the theological sense of salvation after death, but in the
life of the world ). Buddhist countries should have not merely
fellowship, but promote religion and make sacrifices. Merely
to send Bhikkhus to lecture on the Message of the Buddha
does not make people accept His way of Life.
If the peace of the world is to be assured, it is not by
mere lecturing. Those who do not believe in the virtue of
the Path should be persuaded to accept it, and it is obvious
that countries where Buddhism exists should make sacrifices,
establish missions and find funds, so that they can carry on
the work of not merely spreading the gospel, but of converting
men and women to the Eight-Fold Path.” 1
zz
1. : Report of the Ceylon Conference and Proceedings of the First Session
of the World Fellowship of Buddhists held from 25th May to the 6th June
1950 (B. E. 2494)
PDF page 435
120
BUDDHISM PAVED WAY FOR DEMOCRACY
AND SOCIALISTIC PATTERN OF SOCIETY
The Conference of the World Fellowship of Buddhists was
held in Ceylon from 25th May to 6th June 1950. Dr. B. R
Ambedkar attended the Conference.
Addressing an International gathering at Colombo, on
June 6th, 1950, Dr. Ambedkar said,
“Most people who have studied rise and fall of Buddhism in
India would admit that this subject had not been adequately
dealt with as it should have been. I have not been able to
find any authentic material explaining why Buddhism rose
to the height it achieved and why it disappeared in India.
To know a subject thoroughly, one must know its relevant
traditions exactly and precisely. Similarly, the significance
of Buddhism would not be understood unless the exact
circumstances which gave birth to it are understood. I
disagree with the view that Hinduism has all along been
the religion of India. Hinduism is the latest development of
social thought in India.
The religion of India has undergone three changes. Vedic
religion which was practised first gave way, in course of
time, to Brahmanism and this in turn to Hinduism. It was
during Brahminic period that Buddhism was born. This
was because Buddhism opposed inequality, authority and
division of society into various classes which Brahminism
had introduced in India.
It is easy to practise the Vedic religion. In it, performance
of yagya (yajnas) is the main puja. The Vedic Aryans used
to worship innumerable Gods. They used to please them by
performing yagyas. The puja to be performed for these Gods
should necessarily be sacred and superb. In those Agrarian
times, cows were the chief wealth of the Aryans. Therefore, they
used to sacrifice cows to honour their deities. In this way, Vedic
Dharma encouraged violence. Brahmins succeded in organising
the society only by adopting Vedic yagyas. The Brahmins also