Vol. 3 · pages 326–330
Philosophy of Hinduism; Revolution and Counter-Revolution in Ancient India; Buddha or Karl Marx
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 326
313
THE TRIUMPH OF BRAHMANISM
Holding that the Shudra was born to be servile, Manu made his laws
accordingly so as to compel him to remain servile. In the Buddhist
regime a Shudra could aspire to be a judge, a priest and even a King,
the highest status that he could ever aspire to. Compare with this the
ideal that Manu places before the Shudra and one can get an idea of
what fate was to be under Brahmanism :
X. 121. If a Shudra, (unable to subsist by serving Brahmanas),
seeks a livelihood, he may serve Kshartiyas, or he may also seek to
maintain himself by attending on a wealthy Vaishya.
X. 122. But let a (Shudra) serve Brahmanas, either for the sake of
heaven, or with a view to both (this life and the next); for he who is
called the servant of a Brahmana thereby gains all his ends.
X. 123. The service of Brahmanas alone is declared (to be) an
excellent occupation for a Shudra; for whatever else besides this he
may perform will bear him no fruit.
X. 124. They must allot to him out of their own family (property) a
suitable maintenance, after considering his ability, his industry, and
the number of those whom he is bound to support.
X. 125. The remnants of their food must be given to him, as well
as their old household furniture.
Manu can hardly be said to be more tender to women than he was to
the Shudra. He starts with a low opinion of women. Manu proclaims :
II. 213. It is the nature of women to seduce men in this (world); for
that reason the wise are never unguarded in (the company of) females.
II. 214. For women are able to lead astray in (this) world not only
a fool, but even a learned man, and (to make) him a slave of desire
and anger.
II. 215. One should not sit in a lonely place with one’s mother
sister or daughter; for the senses are powerful, and master even a
learned man.
IX. 14. Women do not care for beauty, nor is their attention fixed on
age; (thinking), ‘(It is enough that) he is a man ’, they give themselves
to the handsome and to the ugly.
IX. 15. Through their passion for men, through their mutable temper,
through their natural heartlessness, they become disloyal towards
their husbands, however carefully they may be guarded in this (world).
IX. 16. Knowing their disposition, which the Lord of creatures laid in
them at the creation, to be such, (every) man should most strenuously
exert himself to guard them.
PDF page 327 (printed page 314)
314 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
IX. 17. (When creating them) Manu allotted to women (a love of
their) bed, (of their) seat and (of) ornament, impure desires, wrath,
dishonesty, malice, and bad conduct.
The laws of Manu against women are of a piece with this view.
Women are not to be free under any circumstances. In the opinion of
Manu :—
IX. 2. Day and night women must be kept in dependence by the
males (of) their (families), and, if they attach themselves to sensual
enjoyments, they must be kept under one’s control.
IX. 3. Her father protects (her) in childhood, her husband protects
(her) in youth, and her sons protect (her) in old age; a woman is never
fit for independence.
IX. 5. Women must particularly be gurded against evil inclinations,
however trifling (they may appear); for, if they are not guarded, they
will bring sorrow on two families.
IX. 6. Considering that the highest duty of all castes, even weak
husbands (must) strive to guard their wives.
V. 147. By a girl, by a young woman, or even by an aged one,
nothing must be done independently, even in her own house.
V. 148. In childhood a female must be subject to her father, in
youth to her husband, when her lord is dead to her sons; a woman
must never be independent.
V. 149. She must not seek to separate herself from her father,
husband, or sons; by leaving them she would make both (her own
and her husband’s) families contemptible. Woman is not to have a
right to divorce.
IX. 45. The husband is declared to be one with the wife, which
means that there could be no separation once a woman is married.
Many Hindus stop here as though this is the whole story regarding
Manu’s law of divorce and keep on idolizing it by comforting their
conscience by holding out the view that Manu regarded marriage as
sacrament and therefore did not allow divorce. This of course is far
from the truth. His law against divorce had a very different motive. It
was not to tie up a man to a woman but it was to tie up the woman
to a man and to leave the man free. For Manu does not prevent a
man for giving up his wife. Indeed he not only allows him to abandon
his wife but he also permits him to sell her. But what he does is to
prevent the wife from becoming free. See what Manu Says :
IX. 46. Neither by sale nor by repudiation is a wife released from
her husband.
PDF page 328
315
THE TRIUMPH OF BRAHMANISM
The meaning is that a wife, sold or repudiated by her husband, can never
become the legitimate wife of another who may have bought or received
her after she was repudiated. If this is not monstrous nothing can be. But
Manu was not worried by considerations of justice or injustice of his laws.
He wanted to deprive women of the freedom she had under the Buddhistic
regime. He knew, by her misuse of her liberty, by her willingness to marry
the Shudra that the system of the gradation of the Varna had been destroyed.
Manu was outraged by her license and in putting a stop to it he deprived
her of her liberty.
A wife was reduced by Manu to the level of a slave in the matter of
property.
IX. 146. A wife, a son, and a slave, these three are declared to have no
property; the wealth which they earn is (acquired) for him to whom they belong.
When she becomes a widow Manu allows her maintenance if her husband
was joint and a widow’s estate in the property of her husband if he was
separate from his family. But Manu never allows her to have any dominion
over property.
A woman under the laws of Manu is subject to corporal punishment and
Manu allows the husband the right to beat his wife.
VIII. 299. A wife, a son, a slave, a pupil, and a younger brother of the full
blood, who have committed faults, may be beaten with a rope or a split bamboo.
In other matters woman was reduced by Manu to the same position as
the Shudra.
The study of the Veda was forbidden to her by Manu as it was to the
Shudra.
II. 66. Even for a woman the performance of the Sanskaras are necessary
and they should be performed. But they should. be performed without uttering
the Veda Mantras.
IX. 18. Women have no right to study the Vedas. That is why their Sanskars
are performed without Veda Mantras. Women have no knowledge of religion
because they have no right to know the Vedas. The uttering of the Veda
Mantras is useful for removing sin. As women cannot utter the Veda Mantras
they are as unclean as untruth is.
Offering sacrifices according to Bramhanism formed the very soul of
religion. Yet Manu will not allow women to perform them. Manu ordains
that :—
XI. 36. A woman shall not perform the daily sacrifices prescribed by the Vedas.
XI. 37. If she does it she will go to hell.
PDF page 329 (printed page 316)
316 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
To disable her from performing such sacrifices Manu prevents her from
getting the aid and services of a Bramhin priest.
IV. 205. A Bramhan must never eat food given at a sacrifice performed by
a woman.
IV. 206. Sacrifices performed by women are inauspicious and not acceptable
to God. They should therefore be avoided.
Woman was not to have any intellectual persuits and nor free will nor
freedom of thought. She was not to join any heretical sect such as Buddhism.
If she continues to adhere to it, till death she is not to be given the libation
of water as is done in the case of all dead.
Finally a word regarding the ideal of life, Manu has sought to place before
a woman. It had better be stated in his own words :
V. 151. Him to whom her father may give her, or her brother with the
father’s permission, she shall obey as long as he lives and when he is dead,
she must not insult his memory.
V. 154. Though destitute of virtue, or seeking pleasure elsewhere, or devoid
of good qualities, yet a husband must be constantly worshipped as a god by a
faithful wife.
V. 155. No sacrifice, no vow, no fast must be performed by women, apart
from their husbands; if a wife obeys her husband, she will for that reason alone
be exalted in heaven.
Then comes the choicest texts which forms the pith and the marrow of
this ideal which Manu prescribes for the women :
V. 153. The husband who wedded her with sacred Mantras, is always a
source of happiness to his wife, both in season and out of season, in this world
and in the next.
V. 150. She must always be cheerful, clever in the management of her
household affairs, careful in cleaning her utensils, and economical in expenditure.
This the Hindus regard as a very lofty ideal for a woman!!!
The severity of these laws against Shudras and women show that the
phenomenal rise of these classes during the Buddhist regime had not only
offended the Brahmins but had become intolerable to them. It was a complete
reversal of their sacred social order from top to bottom. The first had become
last and the last had become first. The laws of Manu also explain, the
determined way in which the Brahmins proceeded to use their political power
to degrade the Shudras and the women to their old status. The triumphant
Bramhanism began its onslaught on both the Shudras and the women in
pursuit of the old ideal namely servility and Bramhanism did succeed in
making the Shudras and women the servile classes, Shudras the serfs to the
three higher classes and women the serfs to their husbands. Of the black
PDF page 330
317
THE TRIUMPH OF BRAHMANISM
deeds committed by Brahmanism after its triumph over Buddhism this
one is the blackest. There is no parallel in history for so foul deeds of
degradation committed by a class of usurpers in the interest of class
domination. The collosal character of this deed of degradation perpetrated
by Barahmanism is unfortunately not fully realized. It is concealed by
those small monosyllablic words, Stri and Shudra. Let those who wish
to get an idea of the enormity of their deed think, of the numbers that
lie behind these two terms. What part of the population do they apply
to ? The woman represents one half of the population. Of the balance
the Shudra represents not less than two third. The two together make
up about 75% of the total population. It is this huge mass of people
that has been doomed by Brahmanism to eternal servility and eternal
degradation. It is because of the collosal scale of degradation whereby
75% of her people were deprived of their right to life, liberty and persuit
of happiness that India became a decaying if not a dead nation.
The principle of graded inequality runs through the whole of the Manu
Smriti. There is no department of life in which he has not introduced his
principle ,of graded inequality. For a complete and thorough exposition
of it, it would be necessary to reproduce the whole of Manu Smriti. I
will take only a few departments to illustrate how in the hands of Manu
the principle of graded inequality became imbedded in the social life.
Take the field of marriage. Observe the rule of Manu :-—
III. 13. It is declared that a Shudra woman alone (can be) the wife of
a Shudra, she and one of his own caste (the wives) of a Vaishya, those
two and one of his own caste the wives of a Kshatriya, those three and
one of his own caste (the wives of a Bramhan).
Take the rules of Manu regarding the treatment of guests :—
III. 110. But a Kshatriya (who comes) to the house of a Brahmana is
not called a guest (atithi), nor a Vaisya, nor a Shudra, nor a personal
friend, nor a relative, nor the teacher.
III. 111. But if Kshatriya comes to the house of a Brahmana in the
manner of a guest, (the house-holder) may feed him according to his
desire, after, the above mentioned Brahmanas have eaten.
III. 112. Even a Vaisya and a Shudra who have approached his house
in the manner of guests, he may allow to eat with his servants, showing
(thereby) his compassionate disposition.
In the house of a Brahmana, nobody except a Brahmin is to have
the honour of being a guest. 1 If the Kshatriya comes in the manner
1 The word guest is used by Manu in a technical sense and means a Bramhana who stays
one night only see III. 102.