Vol. 3 · pages 416–420
Philosophy of Hinduism; Revolution and Counter-Revolution in Ancient India; Buddha or Karl Marx
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 416
403
BRAHMINS VERSUS KSHATRIYAS
anticipation: “If I have given gifts, and offered sacrifices an
gratified my religious teachers, then may I be reunited with
my son and with thee (my wife) in another world.” The queen
determines to die in the same manner. When Harishchandra,
after placing his son’s body on the funeral pile, is meditating
on the Lord Shri Narayan krishna, the supreme spirit, all the
gods arrive, headed by Dharma (righteousness), and accompanied
by Vishvamitra. Dharma entreats the king to desist from his
rash intention; and Indra announces to him that he, his wife,
and son have conquered heaven by their good works. Amrosia,
the antidote of death, and flowers are rained by the god from
the sky; and the king’s son is restored to life and the bloom of
youth. The king, adorend with celestial clothing and garlands,
and the queen, embrace their son. Harishchandra, however
declares that he cannot go to heaven till he has received his
master the Chandala’s permission, and has paid him a ransom.
Dharma then reveals to the king that it was he himself who
had miraculously assumed the form of a Chandala. The king
next objects that he cannot depart unless his faithful subjects,
who are shares in his merits, are allowed to acompany him
to heaven, at least for one day. This request is granted by
Indra; and after Vishvamitra has inaugurated Rohitasva the
king’s son to be his successor, Harishchandra, his friends and
followers, all ascend in company to heaven. Even after this
great consummation, however, Vashishtha, the family-priest of
Harishchandra, hearing, at the end of a twelve years’ abode in
the waters of the Ganges, an account of all that has occured,
becomes vehementaly incensed at the humiliation inflicted on
the excellent monarch, whose virtues and devotion to the gods
and Brahmans he celebrates, declares that his indignation had
not been so great roused even when his own hundred sons had
been slain by Vishvamitra, and in the following words dooms the
latter to be transformed into crane. Wherefore that wicked man,
enemy of the Brahmans, smitten by my curse, shall be expelled
from the society of intelligent beings, and losing his understanding
shall be transformed into a Vaka.” Vishvamitra reciprocates the
curse, and changes Vashishtha into a bird of the species called
Ari. In their new shapes the two have a furious fight, the Ari
being of the portentous height of two thousand yojanas = 18,000
miles, and the Vaka of 3090 yojanas. The first assail each other
with their wings; then the Vaka smites his antagonist in the
same manner, while the Ari strikes with his talons. Falling
mountains, overturned by the blasts of wind raised by the flapping
of their wings, shake the whole earth, the waters of the ocean
PDF page 417 (printed page 404)
404 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
overflow, the earth itself, thrown off its perpendicular slopes downwards
patala, the lower regions. Many creatures perish by these various
convulsions. Attracted by the dire disorder, Brahma arrives, attended
by all the gods, on the spot, and command the comptants to desist from
their fray. They were too fiercely infuiriated to regard this injunction;
but Brahma put an end to the conflict by restoring them to their
natural forms, and conselling them to be reconciled.
The next episode in which they came in as opponents is connected
with Ambarish King of Ayodhya.
1The story relates that Ambarisha was engaged in performing a
sacrifice, when Indra carried away the victim. The priest said that this
ill-omened event had occurred owing to the king’s had administration,
and would call for a great expiation, unless a human victim could be
produced. After a long search the royal rishi (Ambarisha) came upon the
Brahman-rishi Richika, a descendent of Bhrigu, and asked him to sell
one of his sons for a victim, at the price of a hundred thousand cows.
Richika answered that he would not sell his eldest son; and his wife
added that she would not sell the youngest: eldest sons” she observed,
“being generally the favourites of their fathers, and youngest sons of
their mothers.” The second son, Sunassepna, then said that in that
case he regarded himself as the one who was to be sold, and desired
the king to remove him. The hundred thousand cows, with ten millions
of gold pieces and heaps of jewels, were paid down, and Sunassepa
carried away. As they were passing through Pushkara Sunassepa
beheld his maternal uncle Vishvamitra who was engaged in austerities
there with other rishis, threw himself into his arms, and implored his
assistance, urging his orphan friendless, and helpless state, as claims
on the sage’s benevolence.
“Vishvamitra soothed him: and pressed his own sons to offer
themselves as victim in the room of Sunassepa. This proposition
met with no favour from Madhushyanda and the other sons of the
royal hermit, who answered with haughtiness and derision: “How
is that thou sacrificest thine own sons, and seekest to rescue those
of others ? We look upon this as wrong, and like the eating of one’s
own flesh.” The sage was exceedingly wroth at this disregard of his
injunction, and doomed his sons to be born in the most degraded
classes, like Vashishtha’s sons, and to eat dog’s flesh, for a thousand
years. He then said to Sunassepa: “When thou art bound with
hallowed cords, decked with a red garland, and annointed with
unguents, and fastened to the sacrificial post of Vishnu, then address
thyself to Agni, and sing these two divine verses (gathas), at the
1Muir Vol. I. pp. 405-407.
PDF page 418
405
BRAHMINS VERSUS KSHATRIYAS
sacrifice of Ambarisha; then shalt thou attain the fulfilment.” Being
furnished with the two gathas, Sunassepa proposed at once to king
Ambarisha that they should set out for their destination. When
bound at the stake to be immolated, dressed in a red garment, “he
celebrated the two gods, Indra and his younger brother (Vishnu), with
the excellent verses. The thousand-eyed (Indra) was pleased with the
secret hymn, and bestowed long life on Sunassepa.”
The last episode recorded in which the two appear as opponents
is connected with King Kalmashapada. The episode is recorded in
the Adi Parva of the Mahabharata.
“1Kalmashapada was a King of the race Ikshvaku. Vishvamitra
wished to be employed by him as his officiating priest; but the king
preferred Vashishtha.” It happened, however, that the king went out
to hunt, and after having killed a large quantity of game, he became
very much fatigued, as well as hungry and thirsty. Meeting Saktri,
the eldest of Vashishtha’s hundred sons, on the road, he ordered him
to get out of his way. The priest civilly replied: “The path is mine, O
King; this is the immemorial law; in all observances the king must
cede the way to the Brahman.” Neither party would yield, and the
dispute waxing warmer, the king struck the muni with his whip. The
muni, resorting to the usual expedient of offended sages, by a curse
doomed the king to become a man eater. “It happened that at that
time enmity existed between Vishvamitra and Vashishtha on account of
their respective claims to be priest to Kalmashapada.” Vishvamitra had
followed the king; and approached while he was disputing with Saktri.
Perceiving, however, the son of his rival Vashishtha, Vishvamitra made
himself invisible, and passed them, watching his opportunity. The
king began to implore Saktri’s clemency: but Vishvamitra wishing to
prevent their reconciliation, commanded a Rakshasa (a man-devouring
demon) to enter into the king. Owing to the conjoint influence of the
Brahma-rishi’s curse, and Vishvamitra’s command, the demon obeyed
the injunction. Perceiving that his object was gained, Vishvamitra left
things to take their course, and absented himself from the country.
The king having happened to meet a hungry Brahman, and sent
him, by the hand of his cook (who could procure nothing else), some
human flesh to eat, was cursed by him also to the same effect as by
Saktri. The curse, being now augmented in force, took effect, and
Saktri himself was the first victim, being eaten up by the King. The
same fate befell all the other sons of Vashishtha at the instigation
of Vishvamitra. Perceiving Saktri to be dead, Vishvamitra again and
1Muir Vol. I, pp. 415-417.
PDF page 419 (printed page 406)
406 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
again incited the Rakshasa against the sons of Vashishtha; and
accordingly the furious demon devoursed those of his sons who
were younger than Saktri as a lion eats up the small beasts of the
forest. On hearing of the destruction of his sons by Vishvamitra,
Vashishtha supported his affliction, as the great mountain
sustains the earth. He meditated his own destruction, but never
thought of exterminating the Kausikas. This divine sage hurled
himself from the summit of Meru, but fell upon the rocks as if
on a heap of cotton. Escaping alive from his fall, he entered a
glowing fire in the forest; but the fire, though fiercely blazing,
not only failed to burn him, but seemed perfectly cool. He next
threw himself into the sea with a heavy stone attached to his
neck; but was cast up by the waves on the dry land. He then
went home to his hermitage; but seeing it empty and desolate,
he was again overcome by grief and went out; and seeing the
river Vipasa which was swolen by the recent rains and sweeping
along many trees torn from its banks, he conceived the design
of drowning himself into its water, he accordingly tied himself
firmly with cords, and threw himself in, but the river severing
his bonds, deposited him unbound (vipasa) on dry land; whence
the name of the stream, as imposed by the sage. He afterwards
saw and threw himself into the dreadful Satadru (Sutlej), which
was full of alligators, etc., and derived its name rushing away in
a hundred directions on seeing the Brahman brilliant as fire. In
consequence of this he was once more stranded; and seeing he
could not kill himself, he went back to his hermitage.”
There are only particular instances of their general enmity
towards each other. This general enmity was of a mortal kind so
much so that Vishvamitra wanted even to murder Vashishtha. This
is related in the Shalyaparva of the Mahabharata. Says the author
of the Mahabharata:
“1There existed a great enmity, arising from rivalry in
their austerities, between Vishvamitra and the Brahman
rishi Vashishtha. Vashishtha had an extensive hermitage in
Sthanutirtha, to the east of which was Vishvamitra’s………These
two great ascetics were every day exhibiting intense emulation
in regard to their respective austerities. But Vishvamitra,
beholding the might of Vashishtha, was the most chagrined;
and fell into deep thought. The idea of this sage, constant in
duty (!) was the following: ‘This river Sarasvati will speedily
bring to me on her current the austere Vashishtha, the most
eminent of all mutterers of prayers. When that most excellent
Brahman has come, I shall most assuredly kill him.’ Having thus
1Muir Vol. I, pp. 420-422.
PDF page 420
407
BRAHMINS VERSUS KSHATRIYAS
determined, the divine sage Vishvamitra, his eyes reddened by
anger, called to mind the chief of rivers. She being thus the
subject of his thoughts, became very anxious, as she knew him
to be very powerful and very irascible. Then trembling palid, and
with joined hands, the Sarasvati stood before the chief of munis.
Like a woman whose husband has been slain, she was greatly
distressed; and said to him, ‘What shall I do?” The incensed
muni replied, ‘Bring Vashishtha hither speedily, that I may
slay him.’ The lotus-eyed goddess, joining her hands trembled
in great fear, like a creeping plant agitated by the wind”……….
Vishvamitra, however, although he saw her condition, repeated
his command. “The Sarasvati, who knew how sinful was his
design, and that the might of Vashishtha was unequalled,
went trembling, and in great dread of being cursed by both
the sages, to Vashishtha, and told him what his rival had said.
Vashishtha seeing her emaciated, pale, and anxious, spoke thus:
‘Deliver thyself, O chief of rivers; carry me unhesitatingly to
Vishvamitra, lest he curse thee’. Hearing these words of the
merciful sage, the Sarasvati considered how she could act most
wisely. She reflected, ‘Vashishtha has always shown me great
kindness; I must seek his welfare.’ Then obsering the Kausika
sage praying and sacrificing on her brink, she regarded that as
a good opportunity, and swept away the bank by the force of her
current. In this way the son of Mitra and Varuna (Vashishtha)
was carried down; and while he was being borne along, he thus
celebrated the river: ‘Thou, O Sarasvati, issuest from the lake
of Brahma, and pervadest the whole world with thy excellent
streams. Residing in the sky, thou dischargest water into the
colouds. Thou alone art all waters. By these we study.’ ‘Thou
art nourishment, radiance, fame, perfection, intellect, light. Thou
art speech; thou art Svaha; this world is subject to thee. Thou,
in fourfold form, dwellest in all creatures’…….
Beholding Vashishtha brought near by the Sarasvati,
Vishvamitra searched for a weapon with which to make an end
of him. Perceiving his anger, and dreading lest Brahmanicide
should ensue, the river promptly carried away Vashishtha in
an easterly direction; thus fulfilling the commands of both
sages, but eluding Vishvamitra. Seeing Vashishtha so carried
away, Vishvamitra, impatient, and enraged by vexation, said
to her: ‘Since thou, O chief of rivers, hast elued me, and hast
receded, roll in waves of blood acceptable to the chief of demons,”
(which are fabled to gloat on blood). “The Sarasvati, being thus
cursed, flowed for a year in a stream mingled with blood…..
Rakshasas came to the place of pilgrimage, where Vashishtha
had been swept away, and revealed in drinking to satiety