Vol. 4 · pages 186–190
Riddles in Hinduism
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 186
175
APPENDIX III
20. And he commanded the most mighty men that were in his army
to bind Sha-drach, Me-shach, and A-bed-ne-go and to cast them into the
burning fiery furnace.
21. Then these men were bound in their coats, their hosen, and their
hats, and their other garments, and were cast into the midst of the burning
fiery furnace.
22. Therefore because the king’s commandment was urgent, and the
furnace exceeding hot, the flame of the fire slew those men that took up
Sha-drach, Me-shach, and A-bed-ne-go.
23. And these three men, Sha-drach, Me-shach, and A-bed-ne-go, fell
bound into the midst of the burning fiery furnance.”
Why did the Brahmins give up the first Trinity? There is no indication
that they were compelled to foreswear those Gods. Was it love of gain
or lucre?
The second question is why did the Brahmins who became the votaries
of the three Gods follow the principle of live and let live? Why was one
sect bent on destroying the other. There was no doctrinal difference
between these sects worth the name. Their theology, cosmology and
philosophy were all one and the same. The riddle becomes all the great.
Was this sectarian quarrel political? Did the Brahmins make religion a
matter of politics? Otherwise what is the explanation of this quarrel ?
zz
PDF page 187
APPENDIX IV
II SMARTH DHARMA
The Sacred literature of Smarth Dharma consists of the Smritis or
the Law Books. These law books contain what may be called the Canon
Law. This Canon Law as will be seen later on is vast in its compass
and treats of such subjects as law, government, civic rights and duties
of the different classes in society, penances for sins and punishments for
offences. The purely secular part of this Dharma is not relevant for the
purpose in hand. What is relevant is that part, of it which is accepted
as belonging strictly to religion.
The Smarth Dharma i.e. Dharma based on Smritis is based on five
dogmas. The first dogma of Smarth Dharma is the belief in Trinity of
Gods, composed of three Gods: Brahma, Vishnu and Mahesh or Shiva. In
this Trinity, Brahma is the creator of the world, Vishnu is the preserver
and Shiva is the destroyer. Instead of the thirty-three Gods of the Srauta
Dharma, Smarth Dharma limits the pantheon to only three.
The second dogma of the Smarth Dharma is the recognition of the
purificatory ceremonies which are called Sanskaras or sacraments.
According to the Smarth Dharma every householder must perform certain
ceremonies. If he does not he becomes a patit i.e. one who is fallen from
grace and therefore.........
(The above text is on a typed Page No. 21. Further pages of this chapter
are missing. The following text is from the loose sheets enumerated in blue
pencil from page No. 55 to 65 only, except page No. 56. All these pages
have corrections and instructions in the handwriting of the author. )—Ed.
There are few loose pages on ‘ Smarth Dharma and Tantrik Dharma’.
Smarth Dharma is numbered as Part II while Tantrik Dharma is numbered
as Part III. It seems that Part I consisted of Srauta Dharma. There is
only one page of Smarth Dharma numbered as 21. The Tantrik Dharma
starts from page 55 and ends at page 65 except page No. 56 with three
more handwritten pages added by the author.—Ed.
PDF page 188
177
APPENDIX IV
Punishments and Penances occupy very prominent place in
Pauranik Dharma. In the Srauta Dharma Yama has nothing to
do with the future punishment of the wicked. The idea of penal
retribution after death for sins committed during life is unknown.
But the Puranas have considerably enlarged the Powers of Yama
in this respect.
“Yama fulfils the office of judge of the dead, as well as sovereign of
the damned; all that die appearing before him, and being confronted with
Chitragupta, the recorder, by whom their actions have been registered.
The virtuous are thence conveyed to Swarga, or Elysium, whilst the
wicked are driven to the different regions of Naraka, or Tartarus”.
“ The dreadful Chitragupta with a voice like that issuing from
the clouds at the mundane dissolution, gleaming like a mountain
of collyrium, terrible with lightning like weapons, having thirty-two
arms, as big as three yojans, red-eyed, long-nosed, his face furnished
with grinders and projecting teeth, his eyes resembling oblong ponds,
bearing death and diseases.”
Sin will be punished after death. So also there is expiation for sin
if the- sinner wishes by performing certain penances for removing sin.
But what is sin? According to the Pauranik Dharma it does not
mean the commission of a moral wrong. It means the non-performance
of the observances prescribed by the Puranas. Such is Pauranik
Dharma.
III TANTRIK DHARMA
What is known as the Tantrik Dharma centres round the worship
of Shakti. Shakti literally means power or energy. But in Tantrism
it means the female partner of a male God. The literature of the
Tantrik Dharma is quite vast and forms quite a separate branch
of the Hindu Religious literature. It is necessary to observe that
the Shakta form of Hinduism is equipped with a vast mythological
personnel of its own, an immense array of female personalities,
constituting a distinct division of the Hindu Pantheon.
In its origin the Tantrik Dharma is only an extension of the
Pauranik Dharma. It is the Puranas which first began with the
recognition of the female unmarried goddesses or as objects of worship.
This was followed by the recognition of married females who were
the wives of the Gods. It is in support of their recognition of the
right of the wives of the Gods to be worshipped as goddesses that the
Puranas set out the principle of Shaktism. According to the Puranas
PDF page 189 (printed page 178)
178 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
a deity though single has a dual character. In one it is quiescent, in the
other active. The active nature of the deity is called his Shakti (i.e. his
power). This Shakti of the deity is personified by the Puranas as the
wife of the deity. This is the foundation of what is called Shaktism or
the worship of the wife of certain deities.
The essence of Shaktism lies in the exclusive worship of the female
deity in her most comprehensive character as the great power (Sakti)
of Nature, the one mother of the Universe (Jagan-Mata, Jagad-Amba)—
the mighty mysterious Force whose function is to direct and control
two quite distinct operations; namely, first, the working of the natural
appetites and passions, whether for the support of the body by eating
and drinking, or for the propagation of living organisms through sexual
cohabitation; secondly, the acquisition of supernatural faculties and
magical powers (siddhi), whether for a man’s own individual exaltation
or for the annihilation of his opponents.
And here it is necessary to observe that the Sakta form of Hinduism
is equipped with a vast mythological Personnel of its own—an immense
array of female personalities, constituting a distinct division of the
Hindu Pantheon.
Yet the whole array of the Tantrik female Pantheon spreading out
as it does into countless ramifications, Shaktism has its root in the
wife of Shiva. By common consent she is held to be the source or first
point of departure of the entire female mythological system. She also
stands at its head; and it is remarkable that in every one of the male
God Shiva’s characteristics, his consort is not only his counterpart,
but a representation of all his attributes intensified. We have already
pointed out how it came to pass that the male God gradually gathered
under his own personality the attributes and functions of all other
divinities, and thus became to his own special worshippers the great
God (Mahadevah) of Hinduism. Similarly and in a much greater degree
did his female counterpart become the one great goddess (Maha-devi)
of the Sakta hierarchy: representing in her own person all other female
manifestations of Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva, and absorbing all their
functions. For this reason even the wives of Brahma and Vishnu were
said to be her daughters. As to the opposite and contradictory qualities
attributed to her, these are no source of difficulty to a Hindu mind.
She is simply in all respects a duplicate of her husband but a duplicate
painted in deeper or more vivid colours.
And just as Shiva is at one time white (Sveta, Sukla) both in
complexion and character, at another black (Kala); so his female
PDF page 190
179
APPENDIX IV
nature also became one half white (whence one of her names Gauri) and
the other half black (whence her name Kali).
Then, again, each of these opposite characters became variously
modified and endlessly multiplied. The white or mild nature ramified
into the Saktis called Uma, Gauri, Lakshmi, Sarasvati, etc., the black
or fierce nature into those called Kali, Durga, Candi, Camunda, etc.
And just as Shiva has 1008 names or epithets, so his wife possesses a
feminine duplicate of nearly everyone of his designations. At least one
thousand distinct appellations are assigned to her, some expressive of
her benignant, some of her ferocious character. Notably it is declared in
the Tantras that if any one repeats eight of her names containing the
letter m, kings will become his servants, all men will love him, and all
his difficulties come to a happy termination.
In short, all the other Saktis came to be included by the Saktas under
the Sakti or female energy of Shiva, which eventually developed into
innumerable separate manifestations and personifications.
But it began in a rather modest way by starting the worship of the
Durga along with Shiva, Laxmi along with Vishnu, Radha along with
Krishna and Sita along with Rama. The number of Shaktis was not
defined.
Sometimes only eight Saktis are enumerated and sometimes nine, viz,
Vaishnavi, Brahmani, Raudri, Mahesvari, Narasinhi, Varahi, Indrani,
Karttiki, and Pradhana. Others reckon fifty forms of the Sakti of Vishnu,
besides Laxmi; and fifty of Siva or Rudra, besides Durga or Gauri.
Sarasvati is named as a Sakti of Vishnu and Rudra, as well as Brahma.
According to the Vayu-purana, the female nature of Rudra (Siva) became
two-fold, one half Asita or white, and the other half Sita or black, each
of these again becoming manifold. The white or mild nature includes
the Saktis Uma, Gauri, Laxmi, Sarasvati, &c, the black or fierce nature
includes Durga, Kali, Candi, Camunda, &c.
Soon however all the Shaktis were universalized under the Shakti or
female energy which eventually developed into innumerable separate
manifestations and personifications.
These personifications, following the analogy of some of Vishnu’s
incarnations, are sometimes grouped according to a supposed
difference of participation in the divine energy, such for example as
the full energy ( purna sakti), the partial (ansarupini) the still more
partial ( kala-rupini), and the partial of the partial (kalansa-rupini),
this last including mortal women in various degrees, from Brahman