Vol. 4 · pages 276–280
Riddles in Hinduism
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 276
265
APPENDIX II
Why then Manu carved out Vanaprastha as a separate stage from
Grahasthashram and from Sannyas? Regarding Vanaprastha it can be
said that such a class existed before Manu. They were called Aranas.
According to Prof. Radha Kumud Mookerji 1:
“Brahmacharis, who wanted to continue as such, without marrying in
pursuit of knowledge, were called Aranas or Aranamans. These Aranas
lived in hermitages in the forests outside the villages or centres of
population. The forests where these Arana ascetics lived were, called
Aranyas. The philosophical speculations of these learned ascetics regarding
such ultimate problems as Brahma, Creation, Soul, or Immortality are
embodied in works called Aranyakas.”
To these old Aranas Manu gave the name Vanaprasthas which has
the same meaning as Aranas. Manu has not only made a change in
names he has introduced another change of considerable significance.
In between Brahmacharya and Vanaprastha he has introduced a
married state. While the original Vanaprastha or Arana was an
unmarried person, Manu’s Vanaprastha was necessarily a married
man. In the old system Brahmacharya was followed by Vanaprastha
or by Grahasthashram depending upon the choice of the individual.
Manu changed the order, so that no one could become a Vanaprastha
unless he was first married.
The old system, the two stages of Vanaprastha or Sannyasi, did not
involve any hardship or cruelty to wives and children. The new system
introduced by Manu did. For to force a person to marry and then to
permit him to abandon his wife is nothing short of cruelty if it did
not involve criminality. But Manu did not care for such considerations.
He was bent on making matrimony compulsory for all.
Why did Manu do it? Why did he make Grahasthashram compulsory
for a Vanaprastha or Sannyasi? Manu recognizes the married state as
a superior stage the foundation of all other states. As he says:
VI. 87 “The student, the householder, the hermit and the ascetics,
these (constitute) four separate orders, which all spring from (the order
of) householders.
VI. 88 “But all (or even any of) these orders, assumed successively in
accordance with the Institutes (of the sacred law), lead the Brahmana
who acts by the preceding (rules) to the highest state.
VI. 89 “And in accordance with the precepts of the Veda and of the
Smriti, the housekeeper is declared to be superior to all of them; for he
supports the other three.
1 Education in Ancient India p. 6.
PDF page 277 (printed page 266)
266 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
VI. 90 “As all rivers, both great and small, find a resting-place in the
ocean, even so men of all orders find protection with householders.”
Granting the truth of this statement the question still remains why did
Manu insist upon marriage as a condition precedent to Vanaprastha or
Sannyas? The only answer is that he wanted to discourage persons, from
becoming Sannyasi. Why did Manu dislike the order of Vanaprastha or
Sannyasi? The answer is that the religion ofBuddhawas largely supported
and propagated by Sannyasis called Bhikshus. It was easy for unmarried
persons to become Bhikshus. Manu was anxious to stop this. Hence the
condition of marriage.
EXCURSUS
COMPARATIVE CODE FOR VANAPRASTHA AND SANNYASI
I. Connection with the household on entry into the order
Vanaprastha Sannyasi
VI. 3 “Abandoning all food raised by
cultivation and all his belongings he
may depart into the forest, either
committing his wife to his sons, or
accompanied by her.”
VI. 38 “Having performed the Ishti,
sacred to the Lord of creatures
(Pragapati) where (he gives) all
his property as the sacrificial fee,
having reposited the sacred fires in
himself, a Brahmana may depart
from his house (as an ascetic).”
II. Rules Regarding Dwelling
Vanaprastha Sannyasi
VI. 4 “Taking with him the sacred
fire and the implements required
for domestic (sacrifices) he may go
forth from the village into the forest
and reside there, duly controlling his
senses.”
VI. 41 “Departing from his house
fully provided with the means
of purification (Pavitra), let him
wander about absolutely silent, and
caring nothing for enjoyments that
may be offered (to him).”
VI. 42 “ Let him always wander
alone, without any companion, in
order to attain (final liberation)
fully understanding that the
solitary man who neither forsakes
nor is forsaken, gains his end.”
PDF page 278
267
APPENDIX II
II. Rules Regarding Dwelling —contd.
Vanaprastha Sannyasi
VI. 43 “He shall neither possess a fire,
nor a dwelling he may go to a village
for his food, (he shall be) indifferent
to everything, firm of purpose,
meditating (and) concentrating his
mind on Brahman.”
III. Rules as to Mode of Life
Vanaprastha Sannyasi
VI. 6 “Let him wear a skin or a
tattered garment; let him bathe in
the evening or in the morning and let
him always wear (his hair in) braids,
the hair on his body, and his nails
(being unclipped).”
VI. 44 “A potsherd (instead of an almsbowl) the roots of trees (for a dwelling),
coarse worn-out garments, life in
solitude and indifference towards,
everything are the marks of one who
has attained liberation.”
VI. 52 “His hair, nails and beard being
clipped carrying an alms-bowl, staff,
and a water-pot let him continually
wander about controlling himself and
not hurting any creature.”
VI. 53 “His vessels shall not be made
of metal, they shall be free from
fractures, it is ordained that they shall
be cleansed with water, like (the cups
called) Kamasa, at a sacrifice.”
VI. 54 “A gourd, a wooden bowl, an
earthen (dish) or one made of split
cane, Manu the son of Swayambhu,
has declared (to be) vessels (suitable)
for an ascetic.”
IV. Rules as to Means of Livelihood
Vanaprastha Sannyasi
VI. 11 “With pure grains, fit for
ascetics, which grow in spring, and
in autumn and which he himself
VI. 49 “ Delighting in what refers
to the Soul sitting in the posture
prescribed by the Yoga,
PDF page 279 (printed page 268)
268 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
IV. Rules as to Means of Livelihood —contd.
Vanaprastha Sannyasi
has collected, let him severally prepare
the sacrificial cakes (purodasa) and
the boiled messes (Karu) as the law
directs.”
independent (of external help) entirely
abstaining from sensual enjoyment
with himself for his only companion
he shall live in this world desiring the
bliss (of final liberation).”
VI. 12 “Having offered those most
pure sacrificial viands, consisting of
the produce of the forest, he may
use the remainder for himself (mixed
with) salt prepared by himself.”
VI. 50 “Neither by explaining prodigies
and omens, nor by skill in astrology
and palmistry nor by giving advice and
by the exposition (of the Sastras) let
him, ever seek to obtain alms.”
VI. 26 “Making no effort (to procure)
things that give pleasure chaste,
sleeping on the bare ground, not
caring for any shelter, dwelling at
the roots of trees.”
VI. 51 “Let him not (in order to beg)
go near a house filled with hermits,
Brahmanas, birds, dogs, or other
mendicants.”
VI. 27 “From Brahmans (who live as)
ascetics; let him receive alms, (barely
sufficient) to support life, or from
other householders of the twice-born
(castes) who reside in the forest.”
VI. 28 “Or (the hermit) who dwells
in the forest) may bring (food) from a
village, receiving it either in a hollow
dish (of leaves) in (his naked) hand,
or in a broken earthern dish, and
may eat eight mouthfuls.”
V. Rules as to Food
Vanaprastha Sannyasi
VI. 13 “Let him eat vegetables that
grow on dry land or in water, flowers,
roots and fruits, the productions of
pure trees and oils extracted from
forest-fruits.”
VI. 55 “Let him go to beg once a day,
let him not be eager to obtain a large
quantity (of alms); for an ascetic who
eagerly seeks alms, attaches himself
also to sensual enjoyments.”
VI. 14 “ Let him avoid honey, flesh
and mushrooms growing on the
VI. 56 “ When no smoke ascends
from (the kitchen) when the pestle
PDF page 280
269
APPENDIX II
V. Rules as to Food —contd.
Vanaprastha Sannyasi
ground (or elsewhere, the vegetables
called) Bhustrina and Sigruka, and
the Sleshmantaka fruits.”
lies motionless, when the members
have been extinguished, when the
people have finished their meal, when
the remnants in the dishes have been
removed let the ascetic always go to
beg.”
VI. 15 “Let him throw away in the
mouth of Asvina the food of ascetics,
which he formerly collected, like-
wise his worn-out clothes and his
vegetables, roots and fruit.”
VI. 57 “ Let him not be sorry when he
obtains nothing, nor rejoice when he
obtains (something), let him (accept)
so much only as will sustain life, let
him not care about the (quality of
his) utensils.
VI. 16 “Let him not eat anything
(grown on) ploughed (land), though
it may have been thrown away by
somebody, nor roots and fruit grown
in a village, though (he may be)
tormented (by hunger).”
VI. 17 “He may eat either what has
been cooked with fire, or what has
been ripened by time; he either may
use a stone for grinding or his teeth
may be his mortar.”
VI. 58 “Let him disdain all (food)
obtained in consequence of humble
salutations, (for) even an ascetic who
has attained final liberation, is bound
(with the fetters of the Samsara) by
accepting (food given) in consequence
of humble salutations.”
VI. 18 “He may either at once (after
his daily meal) cleanse (his vessel
for collecting food), or lay up a store
sufficient for a month, or gather what
suffices for six months or for a year.”
VI. 19 “Having collected food according
to his ability, he may either eat at
night (only), or in the day-time (only)
or at every fourth meal-time or at
every eighth.”
VI. 20 “Or, he may live according
to the rule of the lunar penance
(Kandrayana, daily diminishing the