Vol. 5 · pages 91–95
Essays on Untouchables and Untouchability
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 91 (printed page 76)
76 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
destroyed by war. Those of the new comers who invoked the protection
of the heads of Patrician families of repute and were ready to become
their vassals were known as clients. Those who were too independent
to brook submission to a private patron put themselves under the direct
protection of the sovereign and became royal tenants and were known
as Plebians. The Plebians had the right to hold property both movable
and immovable to transfer it by quirtian modes of conveyance, and to
have the protection for it of the tribunals. But the Plebian had no share
in the Government of the City. He was a half-fledged citizen— civies sine
suffragio. The Plebs were denied any participation in the religion of the
city and as men to whom the suspicia were incompetent, any intermarriage
between the Patrician and the Plebian was out of question. The client
had to look to his Patrician patron for support and maintenance. The
Patrician patron had to provide all that was necessary for his sustenance
and that of his wife and children. This relation was a hereditary one, a
client passed on from father to son. The client had not only to depend
upon his Patrician patron for his maintenance but he had also to depend
upon him for his legal protection. Not being a civic, a client had no right
of suit and his Patrician patron had to assist his client in his redress
for him for his injuries and represent him before the tribunals when he
became involved in litigation.
As to the slaves there were millions of them. A single rich landholder
might own hundreds and even thousands, and it was a poor man that
did not have several at least. They were just things to be owned. They
were not persons in the eye of the law and had therefore no rights. They
received kind treatment from a few humane masters. But generally they
were treated with the greatest cruelty. “If a slave coughs or sneezes
during a meal, if he lets a key fall noisy to the floor, we fall into a great
rage....... often we strike too hard and shatter a limb or break a tooth,”
said Senecca. One rich Roman used to punish his slaves for carelessness
by casting them into a fish pond as food for lamprays. The slaves who
displeased their masters were ordinarily sent to an underground prison.
During the day, they had to work loaded with heavy iron chains. Many
were branded with red hot iron. The mill where the slaves had to work
is thus described by a Roman author; ‘Gods! what poor shrunken up
men? With white skins striped with blows of the whip..... They were
only the shreds of tunis; bent forward, head shaved, the feet held in a
chain, the body deformed by the heat of the fire, the eyelids eaten away
by the fumes, everything covered with grain dust’. 1
1 Seignbbos—History of Ancient Civilization.
PDF page 92
77
PARALLEL CASES
English society also had at one time its servile classes. One has only
to turn to the Domesday Book to see what the state of English Society
was at the time of the Norman conquest.
The Domesday Book which is a social survey of the land in England
and its various kinds of tenants made by William the Conqueror
immediately after his conquest in 1086 shows the following classes in
which the population was divided:
1. Gentry
made up of
Tenants in Chief 1,400
9,300 &
Clergy Under tenants 7,900
2. Freeholders
made up of
Freemen 12,000
44,000
Yeomen Socmen 32,000
3. Half-free
made up of
Villeins 169,000
or 259,000
Unfree Cottars and Borders 90,000
4. Slaves 25,000
Out of a total of 3,37,000 souls as many as 2,84,000 were either
unfree or slaves.
These are examples of servility in which race or religion played no part.
But examples of servility by reason of race or religion are not wanting in
history. The principal one is that of the Jews. On account of the belief
that the Jews were responsible for the death of Christ, the Jews have
been subjected to persecution. During the Middle ages in almost all the
European towns, the Jews were compelled to reside within a restricted
quarter in a separate part of the town, and this Jewish quarter came
to be known as the ‘Ghetto’. A Council held in Coyanza in Australia in
1050 enacted ‘that no Christian shall reside in the same house with Jews,
nor partake of the food; whoever transgresses this decree shall perform
penances for seven days, or, refusing to do it, if a person of rank, he shall
be excommunicated for a year; if of an inferior degree, he shall receive 100
lashes.” The Council of Falencia in 1388 enacted that “Christians must not
dwell within the quarters assigned to the Jews and Moors, and those that
resided within them were to remove therefrom within two months after
the publication of this decree in the Cathedral and if they did not, were
to be compelled by Ecclesiastical censure.” In the Middle ages the Jews
were obliged to have communal baths. No Jewish community could be
PDF page 93 (printed page 78)
78 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
destitute of such baths because the State often forbade the Jews
to bathe in the rivers which the Christians used. In the fourteenth
Century the Jews of Augers were readmitted to the town on several
onerous conditions, one being that they would not bathe in the river
Maine. The State also levied certain taxes upon the Jews. They were
of three kinds—poll taxes, and particular fines and dues for individual
transactions and privileges. The age at which Jews or Jewesses became
liable to the poll tax varied considerably but the age was very young,
and in Spain, as in England in 1273, every Jew above the age of ten
was rateable. The billeting of soldiers on Jews in times of peace was a
frequent species of exaction. So many were the vexatious dues exacted
from the Jews everywhere throughout the Middle ages that it would be
impossible to enumerate them all. To crown all this Pope Innocent III
decided in 1215 that thenceforward the Jews must be marked off from
the Christians by a badge prominently fastened to their outermost
garment. Clear and emphatic in its demand that the Jews must wear
badges, the Laternan council nevertheless avoided details. It left the
definition of the size, colour, and character of the degrading mark to the
taste of local Governors and States. Each Governor and State devised
a badge of its own pattern. On account of the extraordinary number of
modification, size and shape the badge sometimes became obsolete and
the Jews managed to evade it. As the badge was often hidden, in 1525
Pope Clement VII changed it for a yellow hat or bonnet.
A consideration of the position of the Untouchables reminds one of
the position of the Catholics in England. The Catholics were subjected
to many disabilities. The catalogue of their disabilities is given below 1:
“1. That of Catholic marriages or of marriages Catholics celebrated by
Catholic priests being deemed invalid by the existing laws, so that if
one of the parties quit the other quicumque de causa (from any reason
whatsoever), the deserted party receives no relief from the parish, nor
redress from the law of his or her country. The priest, also it is said,
may be transported, or put in prison and condemned to transportation
for having married the parties.
2. That of foundations or of moneys appropriated for the maintenance of
priests, or to support the Catholic worship, being deemed by the existing
laws to be appropriated to superstitious purposes and as such are liable
to confiscation; and when alienated or seized upon by malevolent person
cannot be recovered by law; Instances of such alienations and seizures
might be adduced.
3. That of Catholics serving in His Majesty’s Army and Navy being
withheld from attending Divine Service according to the rite
PDF page 94
79
PARALLEL CASES
of their own religion on Sundays and festivals, and of their being
compelled to go to Protestant Churches on those days against their
will—an evil which leads brave and loyal subjects to complain and
be discontented at a time when every heart and hand should be
united to oppose the enemy; and the United Kingdom should be as
one man.
4. By the 13th Charles II. commonly called the Corporation Act, their
whole body is excluded from offices in cities and corporations.
5. By the 25th Charles II, commonly called the Test Act, their whole
body is excluded from civil and military offices.
6. By the 7th and 8th William III, c. 27 Roman Catholics are liable to
be prevented from voting at elections.
7. By the 30th Charles II, s. 2. c. 1, Roman Catholic peers are prevented
from filling their hereditary seats in Parliament.
8. By the same statute Roman Catholics are prevented from sitting in
the House of Commons.
9. By several statutes Roman Catholics are disabled from presenting to
advowsons, a legal incident of property which the law allows even
to the Jew.
10. Though a considerable proportion of His Majesty’s fleets and armies
was Catholic, not only is no provision made for their religious comforts
etc., but by the articles of war they are liable to the very heaviest
pains and penalties for refusing to join in those acts of conformity
to the religious rites of the Established Church. By the articles of
war, section 1, a soldier absenting himself from Divine service and
sermon is liable, for the first offence, to forfeit one Shilling, and for
the second and every other offence, to forfeit one Shilling and to be
put in irons. By the same articles section 2, article 5, ‘if he shall
disobey any lawful command of his superior (and of course if he shall
disobey any lawful command of his superior to attend Divine Service
and Sermon) he shall suffer death or such punishment as by general
court martial shall be awarded.
11. In common with the rest of his Majesty’s subjects the Roman Catholics
contribute to the support of the Established Religion; they have
also to support their own religious functionaries; and thus have a
double religious establishment to defray. Of course, however, they do
not complain; but they think it a serious grievance that their own
religious endowments are not legalized like those of the Protestant
Dissenters.
12. In hospitals, workhouses, and other public institutions the
attendance of the ministers of their own communion is sometime
denied to the poor of the Roman Catholic religion, and the children
PDF page 95 (printed page 80)
80 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
of the Roman Catholic poor are sometimes forced into Protestant schools
under the eyes of their parents.”
Like Catholics, the Untouchables also suffer from certain disabilities.
II
[The following essay has been received from Shri S. S. Rege. As it
deals with ‘Negroes & Slavery’ (One of the subjects of the scheme of this
Chapter) which has not been dealt with in the above discussion, it has
been included here —Ed.]
Providence it seems has inexorably doomed the continent of Africa
to be only a nursery of slaves for the free and civilized peoples of Asia
and Europe. The Negro was imported as a slave by the Arabs into Asia
long before he was introduced as a slave by the Europeans into America.
Although this is so, Negro slavery in America and in the English Colonies
has had a sorrowful history which has made people forget the importation
of the Negro as a slave in Asia—and quite naturally—because Negro
slavery in America as carried on by the Europeans was a most revolting
thing. It began in the first decade of the 16th Century and lasted till
the middle of the 19th Century.
In the half century after Columbus first landed in the Bahama
Island in 1492, the Spaniards conquered and partly occupied a huge
area stretching from Mexico through Peru to Uruguay and including all
the larger west Indian Islands, while in 1531 the Portuguese began the
colonization of Brazil. At once the new comers, the Portuguese and the
Spaniards, set themselves to exploit the great natural wealth of their
acquisitions, to work the gold and silver mines on the main land and
to lay out plantations of tobacco indego and sugar in the rich soil of the
island. But they were soon confronted by the difficulty of procuring the
requisite supply of labour. A great deal of it was needed, and the cost
of white men’s wages and the heat of the tropical sun made it virtually
impossible for the Europeans to provide it for themselves. The only labour
supply of a non-European character available on the spot consisted of
the native Indians. The Portuguese and the Spaniards had massacred
many Indians during the conquest. Many had fled to the mountains
and forest from the scourge of the invadors. Those that were available
were made slaves and made to work in the mines. Under the lash of the
Portuguese and the Spaniards and the relentless labour that was exacted
from them in the mines and in the fields the Indians sickened and died.
The conquistadors—as the Spanish pioneers in South America
were called—under the leadership of Nicholas de Ovando who followed
promptly the trail of Columbus, brought with them a young priest