Vol. 6 · pages 136–140
The Evolution of Provincial Finance in British India; The Problem of the Rupee; other economic writings
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 136
121
BUDGET BY ASSIGNMENTS
Statement of Imperial Assignments to the Provinces
for the year 1871-72
Purpose of the Assignment
Amount Assigned
Details Total
Rs. Rs.
Original Assignment ... ... ... 1,19,79,000
Add—
For Cemetery establishments ... ... ... 4,000
„ Compensation for Agra Brick Factory ... ... 28,000 1,14,000
„ Of ce and House Rent ... ... 82.000
1,20,93,000
Deduct—
For transportation charges for convicts ... ... 15,000
,, fees for licensing cargo-boats 2,600 1,24,690
,, receipts of public Works Departments ... ... 1,07,000
1,19,68,310
Special Grants
Add—
For Calcutta University ... ... ... 60,000
„ Midnapore Civil Court Buildings ... ... 31,680 3,41,680
,, Calcutta Small Causes Court Building ... ... 2,50,000
1,23,09,990
Total Assignments for 1871-72 ... 1,23,09,990
Statement of Imperial Assignments to the Provinces
for the year 1872-73
Purpose of the Assignment Amount Assigned
Details Total
Rs. Rs.
Original Assignment ... ... ... 1,19,79,000
Add—
Permanent additions in 1871-2 (as above) ... ... 1,14,000
For Miscellaneous services ... ... ... 2,67,070 3,88,936
,, books and publications ... ... ... 7,600
,, ground-rent of Orphan School at Howrah ... 266
1,23,67,936
Deduct—
Permanent deductions in 1871-2 (as above) ... ... ... 1,24,680 1,30,390
For repairing charges of University ... ... 5,700
1,22,37,546
Special Grants
Add—
For Burdwan Fever Relief ... ... 1,00,000
Compensation for Sudder Court Building ... ... 4,00,000 9,66,670
Capital value of annual, rent of Rs. 21,000 for public
offices 4,66,670
1,32,04,216
Deduct fractions ... ... ... 380
Total Assignments for 1872-3 ... 1,32,03,836
PDF page 137 (printed page 122)
122 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
Statement of Imperial Assignments to the Provinces
for the year 1873-74
Purpose of the Assignment Amount AssignedDetails Total
Rs. Rs.
Permanent Assignment for 1872-3 as above ... 1,22,37,546
Add—
For payment of Medical Officers in charge of Civil stations 3,85,000 4,85,000
For Land Revenue Sub-divisional establishments ... 1,00,000
1,27,22,546
Deduct—
Reduction of rent for public offices ... ... 21,000 21,000
1,27,01,546
Sanctioned for 1873-4 ... ... ... 1,27,01,000
Add for—
Ground rent for Howrah Orphan School ... ... 266
Charges on account of European vagrants ... ... 11,500 18,066
Ground rent charges ... ... ... ... 6,300
Deduct—
For pay of medical pupils withdrawn from provincial
to Imperial.
5,400
3,90,400
For pay of medical officers in charge of civil stations
withdrawn from provincial to imperial.
... ... 3,85,000
Special Grants. 1,23,28,666
Add—
For rent of Small Cause Court ... ... ... 14 400
Total Assignment ... 1,23,43,066
Statement of Imperial Assignments to the Provinces
for the year 1874-75
Purpose of the Assignment
Amount Assigned
Details Total
Rs. Rs.
Permanent Assignment for 1873-4 as above ... 1,23,28,666
Add—
Assignment for encouragement of Mohammedan
education
50,000 50,000
Sanctioned assignment ... ... ... 1,23,78,000
Add—
Grant on account of Model Farm ... ... ... 7,000 8,180
Additional grant for ground-rent ... ... ... 1,180
1,23,86,180
Deduct—
Reduction of outlay on account of churches and
burial grounds
14,314
Reduction on account of Assam transferred ... ... 13,30,000 13,44,580
For ground rent Howrah Orphan School 266
Total Assignment sanctioned ... 1,10,41,600
PDF page 138
123
BUDGET BY ASSIGNMENTS
Statement of Imperial Assignments to the Provinces
for the year 1875-76
Purpose of the Assignment Amount AssignedDetails Total
Rs. Rs.
Permanent Assignment for 1874-5 as above ... 1,10,41,000
Add—
Grant for Botanical gardens ... ... ... 52,500 53,680
” ” Ground rents ... ... ... 1,180
1,10,94,680
Deduct—
Public Works charges on account of the Salt Department 13,683
Assignments on account of lighthouses and ships
withdrawn
1,769 33,163
Assignment on account of Town Improvement Fund of
Assam
17,711
Total Assignment ... 1,10,61,517
Statement of Imperial Assignments to the Provinces
for the year 1876-77
Purpose of the Assignment
Amount Assigned
Details Total
Rs. Rs.
Original Assignment for 1875-6 ... ... ... 1,10,41,000
Add—
For ground rents ... ... ... ... 1,180
” Botanical Gardens ... ... ... 52,500 53,680
1,10,94,680
Deduct—
Public Works charges for Salt Department ... ... 13,683
1,10,80,997
Deduct—
For Form Store Department ... ... ... 8,034
Add— 6,034
For Exhibitions and Fairs ... ... ... 2,000
Total ... 1,10,74,963
Assignment as sanctioned ... ... ... 1,10,75,000
Add—
Grant on account of Bankee and Ungool Estates ... 3,271
Cost of the snake-poison commission, establishments
and contingencies.
6,000 58,753
Grant on account of census registers ... ... 49,482
1,11,33,753
Deduct—
Assignment on account of lighthouses and lightships
withdrawn.
1,769
Assignment of Town Improvement Fund, Assam ... 17,711 22,180
Annual cost of lunatics transferred to Tezpore Lunatic
Asylum.
2,700
Total Assignment ... 1,11,11,573
PDF page 139 (printed page 124)
124 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
This completes the account of the services incorporated
from time to time and the assignments made for them by the
Imperial exchequer during the period in which the system of
budget by assignments remained in force. It now remains to
consider whether the system under the assignment plan was a
success. What constitutes success is a question which is always
open to discussion, for what may seem successful from one point
of view may be the reverse of it from another standpoint. A
discussion, however, of this aspect of the question cannot be
avoided, for it was on the results of one stage that an advance
towards the second was made to depend all throughout the
expansion of Provincial Finance. As the definition of success
varies with the standpoints, we must first ascertain them for
the purpose of our investigation. Let us therefore inquire into
the possible parties whose standpoints counted in the moulding
of Provincial Finance, and without whose satisfactory opinion
about the results achieved, a new step in advance could not
have been taken. The Government of India and the Provincial
Governments were obviously the two principal parties.
Naturally their standpoints were different, if not antagonistic.
The question prominent in the mind of the Government of
India was how big was the gain to the imperial treasury on
the transfer. On the other hand, the Provincial Governments
were concerned to know whether the resources offered by the
Government of India were adequate enough for their safely
accepting the responsibility of managing the incorporated
expenditure. It is obvious the Provincial Governments would
not undertake the responsibility of managing the Imperial
expenditure within a certain assignment unless they were sure
that the assignments were adequate. Similarly, the Imperial
Government would see no advantage in making the transfer
unless the Provincial Governments undertook to manage the
expenditure at a sum less than what it cost under the direct
management of the Imperial Government. Adequacy to the
provinces and gain to the Imperial treasury were therefore the
two chief considerations which prevailed in the determination
of the continuance and expansion of the scheme. The people
of the Provinces may also be conceived of as a third possible
party whose concurrence may have been deemed a necessary
factor in the situation. What their view-point would have
been is not altogether a matter of guess. On the other hand,
anyone sufficiently acquainted with the nature of popular
PDF page 140
125
BUDGET BY ASSIGNMENTS
demands for political advancement could easily imagine that the
most urgent concern of the taxpayers would have been neither the
well-being of the Imperial nor that of the Provincial Governments,
but the distribution of the money they paid along the different
channels of expenditure; and if their approval of the results of
the scheme had been made a necessary condition of advance, it is
probable that the development of Provincial Finance would have
been along different lines.
There was a suggestion even at that time that the people of
the country should have some voice in the financial arrangements
of the country. In paragraph 19 of its Resolution of December
14, 1870, announcing the scheme of Provisional finance, the
Government laid down that
“Each local Government will publish its own Provincial
Service Estimates and Accounts in the local Gazette, together
with a financial exposition (which should, where possible, be
made before the local Legislative Council) analogous to that
annually made in the Legislative Council of the GovernorGeneral.”
If this suggestion had materialized, the Indian taxpayer would
have obtained a voice in determining the financial arrangements
between the Government of India and the Provincial Governments.
There were, however, certain legal difficulties in the way of giving
effect to this suggestion. If the Budget was introduced in the
Council and debate had followed upon it, such a proceeding would
have offended against Section 38 of the Indian Councils Act (24
and 25 Vic. c. 67) and would have, therefore, been illegal unles
the Budget involved some proposal for tax legislation. For, that
Act had provided that the activity of the legislative Council should
not be called into play except for strictly legislative purposes.
If, on the other hand, there was to be no debate, there was no
advantage in this mode of giving publicity to the Budget which
was not equally secured by its publication in the official Gazette.
As a solution of these difficulties, the Government of Madras
proposed1 to the Government of India.
“that the Provincial Budget should form a schedule to
an Appropriation Bill, the contents of which would, after all
the necessary explanation and discussion, be voted section by
section.”
But the Government of India, which had first broached the
subject, was shocked by this suggestion as being revolutionary.
In reply2 it observed:—
1 Letter to the Government of India, Finance Department, No. 147 of April
18, 1871.
2 Legislative Letter to Madras dated July 11, 1871, No. 765.