Vol. 6 · pages 166–170
The Evolution of Provincial Finance in British India; The Problem of the Rupee; other economic writings
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 166
151
BUDGET BY SHARED REVENUES
and charges were marked off from the rest and were shared
between the Imperial and the Provincial in some definitely
fixed proportion. The object of the arrangement was to replace
rigidity in the Provincial revenues by elasticity. In the finances
of the other Provinces there was elasticity in so far as their
assignments were replaced by assigned sources of revenue. But
to the degree in which their revenues were made up of fixed
assignments their finances inevitably suffered from rigidity. In
the case of Burma, however, the substitution of shares of growing
revenues for fixed assignments gave complete elasticity to the
Provincial revenues without which it had become so difficult
to shoulder the responsibility of meeting expanding charges.
In recasting the framework of the Provincial Budget of Burma
on the principle of shared revenues, all the heads of receipts
and charges were made wholly Provincial, with the exception
of the following, which were treated as wholly Imperial :—
(1) The Army ... ... Receipts and Charges.
(2) Post Office ... ... ” ” ”
(3) Telegraph ... ... ” ” ”
(4) Account Department ... ” ” ”
(5) Meteorological Department ... ” ” ”
(6) Political ... ... ” ” ”
(7) Remittance of Treasure and Premium
on Bills of Exchange and unclaimed
Bills of Exchange.
”””
The third category of revenues and charges, namely, jointly
Imperial and Provincial, covered the following items :—
(1) Land Revenue, including capitation tax, but excluding
Fisheries, with such Land Revenue Refunds, charges
of collection and settlement as cannot be attributed to
Fisheries only.
(2) Forest revenue. Expenditure and Refunds.
(3) Export Duty on rice, and Refunds.
(4) Salt Revenue, Expenditure and Refunds.
Items comprising the third category were divided between the
Imperial and Provincial Governments in the proportion of fivesixths to the former and one-sixth to the latter. By adopting this
method of supply Burma, unlike other provinces, secured funds
of an elastic character, for, even though the shares remained
fixed the amount they brought in in any one year varied with the
variation in the total yield of the revenues assigned or shared. Of
course everything depended upon how Burma nursed the revenues
PDF page 167 (printed page 152)
152 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
delegated to its control. But if it did its duty, unlike the other
provinces, its labours were not to be unrequited.
The same principle of shared revenues was applied to the
province of Assam, which had hitherto continued on the old
basis of 1871. Although the settlement with that Province
had been made after that with Burma had been carried out,
the principle of shared revenues as a mode of balancing the
Provincial Budget was not adopted on any appreciable scale.
The reason for this break in the progressive realization of the
principle is not to be attributed to any spirit of hesitation on
the part of the Government of India, but is to be ascribed
mainly to the necessity of the case. As it was contemplated to
reincorporate the province into Bengal it was deemed expedient
to frame the Provincial Budget of Assam on the same plan as
that of Bengal so that their financial fusion might be as easy as
the administrative. Thus the heads of revenue and expenditure
which were provincial in Bengal since 1877 were also made
provincial in Assam in 1879, including “Law Officers,” which
for temporary reasons were reserved as Imperial in Bengal. The
only point at which the new principle was applied consisted
in making the Land Revenue head in Assam a joint head to
be shared by the Imperial and the Provincial Governments in
the proportion of four-fifths of its net yield to the former and
one-fifth to the latter. 1
The beneficial results of the new settlement with these two
Provinces are easily to be seen from the following comparative
table of the estimates of their budgets as prepared on the old
basis and as recast on the new :—
000 omitted
Assam Budget Estimates Bt. Burma Budget Estimates
Old Basis New Basis Old Basis New Basis
1878-9 1879-80 1878-9 1879-80 1878-9 1879-80 1878-9 1879-80
£££££ £££
Revenue ... 2115 2110 3657 3596 4013 4078 9459 9673
Expenditure ... 2253 2261 3480 3566 4169 5111 8926 10119
Surplus ... ... ... 177 30 ... ... 533 ...
Deficit ... 138 151 ... ... 156 1033 ... 526
Closing
Balance
... 206 55 521 555 873 161 1562 1436
From the Resolution of the Government of India in the Department of Finance
and Commerce, No. 1249, dated March 13, 1879.
1 Finance Department Resolution No. 1598, dated April 17, 1879.
PDF page 168
153
BUDGET BY SHARED REVENUES
Once the new principle of shared revenues was established
in the case of Burma and Assam it was not possible for the
Government of India to withhold its application from the other
Provinces. The settlements made in 1877 with the several
Provinces were not only of short duration but were also of
unequal durations. It was only in the case of Bengal and Bombay
that the settlements were made for five years commencing
from 1877-8. In the case of the Central Provinces and the
Punjab the period fixed was three years, while in the case
of the North-Western Provinces it was as short as two years,
from 1877-8. It is evident from this that the settlements with
some other Provinces were to have expired soon after those
with Burma and Assam had been completed, and would have
required to be reconstituted on the basis of shared revenues.
The Government of India, however, delayed the process, and
in that it did wisely, for it was too soon to make the new
principle of shared revenues and charges a basis for universal
application. It was nothing but prudent to have regarded it as
it were in its experimental stage. Secondly, the disadvantages of
the ex-parte treatment of the Provincial Budget had come to be
realized. It then dawned upon the Government of India that the
several provincial Budgets were only parts of an organic whole,
viz., the Imperial Budget, and it was manifestly inadvisable to
frame the Provincial Budgets each by itself without regard to
the claims, needs and exigencies of all others. But in order that
this comparative and compromising operation of judging the
claims of one in the light of the needs of others be performed
with the desired effect of treating the different provinces in
an equitable manner, it was essential that all the Provincial
Budgets be dealt with simultaneously. The importance of this
consideration and the desire to gain time in order to profit
by the experiences of Burma and Assam led the Government
of India with the consent of the Provincial Governments to
extend or shorten, as the case may be, the duration of their
financial agreements with the Provinces so as to bring about
a synchronous expiry of them all on March 31, 1882.
Financial Settlements of 1882-3
The new settlements made with all the provinces with effect
from 1882-31 were marked by an extension of the principle applied
to Burma since 1878. Certain heads, as few in number as possible,
of revenues and charges were wholly, or with minute local excep1 Resolution of the Government of India in the Department of finance and
Commerce, No. 3353, dated September 13, 1881.
PDF page 169 (printed page 154)
154 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
tions only, grouped as Imperial. Others were classed as wholly
Provincial. The remaining were placed in an intermediate category
designated as joint and were in most part shared equally between
the Imperial and the Provincial Governments. In those cases,
however, where the provincialized expenditure exceeded the
resources from the provincialized as well as the shared revenues,
the balance instead of being provided as heretofore by fixed
assignments from the Imperial exchequer was rectified for each
Province by a fixed percentage on its land revenue—a wholly
Imperial head of revenue except in the case of Burma, where
the percentage was extended to the Imperial rice export duty
and salt revenue as well.
Along with the enlargement of the scheme of Provincial Finance
in 1882 the Government of India was also anxious to introduce
simplicity and uniformity in the matter of grouping the different
heads of revenue and expenditure under the three catgegories now
established. It will be remembered that the agreements effected in
1877 were marked by diversity and intricacy. The same charges
were not provincialized in all the Provinces. A charge which was
Provincial in one was Imperial in another. Again, in transferring
charges a grant was often broken up so that a part was made
Provincial and a part reserved as Imperial. On the revenue side
the arrangement was not a little intricate. The computations
owing to the proviso in respect of the assigned revenues made
the calculations far from simple. Both these defects were,
however, removed when the settlements were framed in 1882,
and it is to indicate what heads of revenue and expenditure were
provincialized, what were imperialized, and what were divided
and to what extent, that the following attempt is made.
Revenues
Imperial Provincial
1 Land Revenue The whole except as entered
in the Provincial Column.
In Burma, fisheries; in
the N.W.P. and Oudh
collections from the
Terai, Bhabar and
Dudhi Estates, Rents
of Water-Mills and
Stone Quarries; in
Bombay, Rents of
R e s u m e d S e r v i c e
Lands and Service
Commutations.
In all Provinces, a fixed
per-
PDF page 170
155
BUDGET BY SHARED REVENUES
Revenues—Contd.
Imperial Provincial
centage on the Imperial
land revenue to cover
the difference between
Provincial Revenue
and Provincial
Expenditure.
II Tributes The whole. Nil.
III Forest Half. Half.
IV Excise Do. Do.
V Assessed Taxes Do. Do.
VI Provincial Rates Nil. The whole.
VII Customs All except as entered in the
Provincial Column.
All items other than
Customs Duties; and,
in Burma only, the
same percentage on
Export Duties as on
the Land Revenue.
VIII Salt All except as entered in the
Provincial Column.
All items other than Duty
on Salt and sale of
Salt; and, in Burma
only, the same per
centage on the salt
Revenue as on the
Land Revenue.
IX Opium The whole. Nil.
X Stamps Half. Half.
XI Registration Do. Do.
XIII Post Office Nil. The whole.
XIV Minor Departments Do. Do.
XVI Law and Justice Do. Do.
XVII Police Do. Do.
XVIII Marine As at present. As at present.
XIX Education Nil. The whole.
XX Medical Do. Do.
XXI Stationery and
Printing.
Nil. The whole.
XXII Interest All except as entered in
the Provincial Column.
Interest on Government
securities (Provincial).
XXIII Pensions Book transfers from the
Military and Medical
Funds and subscriptions
to these Funds.
The remainder.
XXIV Miscellaneous Gain by Exchange on
Imperial transactions,
Premia on Bills and
unclaimed Bills of
Exchange.
The remainder.
XXV Railway As at present. Whatever is now provincial
in each Province.
XXVI Irrigation and
Navigation.
Do. Do.
XXVII Other Public Works Receipts from Military
Works.
The remainder.
XXXI Gain by Exchange on
Transactions with
London.
The whole. Nil.