Vol. 6 · pages 291–295
The Evolution of Provincial Finance in British India; The Problem of the Rupee; other economic writings
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 291 (printed page 276)
276 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
Bengal … … 19 ths90
United Provinces … … 18 ths90
Punjab … … 9 ths90
Burma … … 6 ths90½
Central Provinces and Berar 5 ths90
Assam … … 2 ths90½
(19) In cases of emergency the Local Government of any
Province may be required by the Governor-General in
Council, with the sanction of the Secretary of State, to
pay to the Governor-General in Council a contribution
for any financial year in excess of the amount required
by the preceding rules in the case of that year.
Two more matters had to be settled in order to make
the separation between Provincial and Central Finance
as complete as possible. Both were connected with capital
transactions. One was the question of the Provincial Loan
Account. This Account represented the fund from which a
Provincial Government advanced agricultural loans, loans to
indebted landholders, to municipalities and other local bodies,
etc. The capital was provided by the Government of India as
required and was returned to it as it was repaid. The province
paid the Government of India interest on the average capital
outstanding in each year, recouping itself by higher rates of
interest which were supposed to compensate it for bad debts.
It was commonly agreed that it was the natural result of
the Reforms Scheme that the Provinces should for the future
finance their own loan transactions, and that joint accounts of
this nature between them and the Government of India should
be wound up as quickly as possible. The matter was referred
to the Financial Relations Committee and on the basis of its
recommendations in that behalf it was provided by Rule 23
of the Devolution Rules that:
“ Any moneys which, on the 1st day of April 1921, are owed
to the Governor-General in Council on account of advances
PDF page 292
277
THE NATURE OF THE CHANGE
made from the provincial loan account of any Province
shall be treated as an advance to the Local Government
from the revenues of India, and shall carry interest at a
rate calculated on the average rate carried by the total
amount owed to the Governor-General in Council on
this account on the 31st March 1921. The interest shall
be payable upon such dates as the Governor-General in
Council may fix. In addition, the Local Government shall
pay to the Governor-General in Council in each year an
instalment in repayment of the principal amount of the
advance, and this instalment shall be so fixed that the
total advance shall except where for special reasons the
Governor-General in Council may otherwise direct, be
repaid before the expiry of twelve years. It shall be open
to any Local Government to repay in any year an amount
in excess to the fixed instalment.”
The other was the question of responsibility for capital
expenditure on irrigation works. In this as in the matter
of Provincial Loan Account it was agreed that it would be
incompatible with the scheme of complete separation of
Provincial Finance to hand over to the former the control of
irrigation works and to make the latter responsible for the
capital transaction incurred thereon. Hence the rule 1 that:
(1) The capital sums spent by the Governor-General in
Council upon the construction in the various Provinces
of productive and protective irrigation works and of such
other works financed from loan funds as may from time
to time be handed over to the management of Local
Governments shall be treated as advances made to the
Local Governments from the revenues of India. Such
advances shall carry interest at the following rates,
namely :
(a) In the case of outlay up to the end of the financial
year 1916-17, at the rate of 3.3252 per centum.
(b) In the case of outlay incurred after the financial
year 1916-17, at the average rate of interest paid
by the Governor-General in Council on loans raised
in the open market since the end of that year.
(2) The interest shall be payable upon such dates as the
Governor-General in Council may fix.
1 Devolution Rule 24.
PDF page 293 (printed page 278)
278 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
Thus was broken the financial and administrative
strand which tied the Provincial Governments to the
Central Government and prevented the introduction into
them of responsible government. As the Provinces thereby
acquired “an acknowledged authority of their own” over
the services and sources allocated to them it followed
that they should have the freedom to borrow in their own
name, which was denied to them heretofore. Consequently
the Local Government Borrowing Rules’ made under the
Reforms Act provided that subject to certain conditions : 2
“A Local Government may raise loans on the security
of the revenues allocated to it for any of the following
purposes, namely:
(a) To meet capital expenditure on the construction
or acquisition (including the acquisition of land,
maintenance during construction and equipment) of
any work or permanent asset of a material character
in connection with a project of lasting public utility,
provided that:
(i) the proposed expenditure is so large that it cannot
reasonably be met from current revenues, and
(ii) if the project appears to the Governal-General in
Council unlikely to yield a return of not less
than such percentage as he may from time to
time by order prescribe, arrangements are made
for the amortization of the debt;
( b) to meet any classes of expenditure on irrigation which
have under rules in force before the passing of the
Act been met from loan funds ;
( c) for the giving of relief and the establishment and
maintenance of relief works in times of famine or
scarcity ;
1 Rules under Section 2 ( 2) of the Government of India Act, 1919.
2 The rules required that:
(1) No loan shall be raised by a Local Government without the sanction (in
the case of loans to be raised in India) of the Governor-General in Council, or (in
the case of loans to be raised outside India) of the Secretary of State in Council,
and in sanctioning the raising of a loan the Governor-General in Council or the
Secretary of State in Council, as the case may be, may specify the amount of
the issue and any or all of the conditions under which the loan shall be raised.
(2) Every application for the sanction of Secretary of State shall be transmitted
through the Governor-General in Council.
PDF page 294
279
THE NATURE OF THE CHANGE
( d) for the financing of the Provincial Loan Account; and
( e) for the repayment or consolidation of loans raised in
accordance with these rules or the repayment of advance
made by the Governor-General in Council.”
With the cutting off of the financial and administrative
strand there remained only the legislative strand which had
so far debarred the growth of provincial autonomy. This
legislative strand, as was pointed out before, operated through
the principle of requiring previous sanction and subsequent
assent of the Government of India. By the rules made under
the Reforms Act a field has been marked off for the free
exercise of the Legislative powers of the Provinces in which
that principle has been dispensed with. So far as the field of
tax legislation was concerned it was provided 1 that:
“The Legislative Council of a Province may, without
the previous sanction of the Governor-General, make
and take into consideration any law for imposing for the
purposes of the Local Government any tax included in
Schedule I.”
This schedule comprises the following heads of taxation :—
1. A tax on land put to uses other than agricultural.
2. A tax on succession or acquisition by survivorship in
a joint family.
3. A tax on any form of betting or gambling permitted
by law.
4. A tax on advertisements.
5. A tax on amusements.
6. A tax on any specified luxury.
7. A registration fee.
8. A stamp-duty other than duties of which the amount
is fixed by Indian legislation.
In the matter of non-tax legislation the procedure adopted
by the rules has been slightly different. In tax legislation the
rules stated in what cases previous sanction was not necessary.
In non-tax legislation the rules required in what cases previous
sanction was necessary. The effect of this difference in the
1 Rules under Section 10 (3) (a) of the Government of India Act, 1919, Scheduled
Taxes Rules.
PDF page 295 (printed page 280)
280 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
requirements of the rules of previous sanction’ was that
while in matters of tax legislation a Provincial Government
could only levy certain named taxes, in the matter of non-tax
legislation it could do anything provided it did not infringe
certain laws. The reasons for this difference are obvious. A
widening of the basis of provincial taxation means a narrowing
field for imperial taxation. Such a detrimental effect could not
flow to the Government in the matter of non-tax legislation,
be the non-tax legislative powers of the Provinces howsoever
large. The taxing power to be granted to the Provinces had
therefore to be more strictly circumscribed than the grant
of legislative power. None the less it cannot be denied that
the rules regarding previous sanction sufficiently loosened
the legislative strand as to permit of the Provinces being
autonomous in theory as well as in practice.
This autonomy is well reflected in the new Budget
Procedure in the Provinces. Under the old regime the Provincial
Budgets had to be passed by the Finance Department
of the Government of India, the Provincial Accounts to
be supervised by the Accountant-General and audited by
the Controller and Auditor-General of the Government of
India and appropriation reports submitted to the Finance
Department of the Government of India. All this is changed
under the new regime. The Provincial Budget, instead of
being passed by the Finance Department of the Government
of India, is framed by the Finance Department constituted
in each Province under the Reforms Act 2 and is voted item
by item by the Provincial Legislature. 3 The accounts of the
Provinces still continue 4 to be supervised and audited by the
1 Rules under section 10 (3) (L) of the Government of India Act, 1919, Local
Legislature Previous Sanction rules. It should, however, be noted that if a Provincial
Bill is such that it does not require previous sanction it does not follow that it
can become law under the above rules because it has been assented to by the
Provincial Legislation. For, by virtue of another set of Rules made under section
12 (1) of the Government of India Act, 1919, called Reservation of Bills Rules, it
is provided that the Governor of a Province must reserve some and may reserve
other Bills for the subsequent assent of the Governor-General before declaring
them law even if the Bills be such as to require no previous sanction.
2 For the constitution and functions of the Finance Department of the Provinces,
see Part III of Devolution rules made under Section I of the Government of India
Act, 1919.
3 See Rules 25 to 32 of the Rules of Business for Provincial Legislative Councils
made under Section 11 (5) of the Government of India Act, 1919.
4 Rules framed under Section 96D (1) of the Government of India Act.