Vol. 6 · pages 31–35
The Evolution of Provincial Finance in British India; The Problem of the Rupee; other economic writings
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 31 (printed page 16)
16 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
neighbouring village, while certain portions and certain rights
are possessed by the different craftsmen or artisans of the
village, such as the schoolmaster, the washerman, the barber,
the carpenter, the blacksmith, the watchman, the village
accountant, etc. who have each a right to a certain portion
set aside for certain recognized expenses of the village, and
for defraying its hospitality towards strangers [1. cf. 1830,
L. 398, 399, 405, 406, 529.] These village communities are
little republics, having nearly everything that they want within
themselves, and almost independent of any foreign relations.
Dynasty after dynasty tumbles down : revolution succeads
revolution. Hindoo, Pathan, Mogul, Maratha, Sikh, English,
are all masters in turn, but the village communities remain
the same. In times of trouble they arm and fortify themselves;
[2. cf. 1832 Commons’ Rev. Committee, p. 29.] It is difficult to
state the proportion of the produce of the village paid to the
Government: the authorities know little of the precise property
of any of the proprietors; it is not the interest or the wish of
the village that the Government should scrutinize and know
their possessions, therefore if any one of the brotherhood fails
to pay his proportion, that is a matter for the villagers at large
to settle, and they will often come forward to pay it for him,
but these are all private arrangements kept to themselves : and
the Moceadim has no power from the Government to enforce
this assessment, what each man in the village has to pay is an
internal arrangement, which it is desirable for the Government
not to interfere in, the villagers settling among themselves
what each has to pay, the total assessment being calculated
after enquiry into the state of prosperity in the village : what
it has hitherto paid : what it is capable of paying : the state
of the village lands, and what assessment they ought to bear
with reference to the produce. [3. cf. 1830 L. 401, 402, 404,
528, 583, 584.]
Surveys of considerable expense have been made by the
Government : a minute account taken of the state of the land
in each village, the fields examined in the presence of surveying
officers with all the assistance they can procure, not only from
their own servants, but from the village communities, the people
themselves interested, and also the ryots and people of the
PDF page 32 (printed page 17)
17ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE OF THE EAST INDIA COMPANY
neighbouring villages who are invited to attend. The exact
limits of the village are put down, and even the details of land
within the village, the productions, the houses, fruit-bearing
trees, and son on : the assessment is grounded upon these
particulars [1. cf. 1831 C. 3492.]
III. The Ryotwar System
The peculiar principle of the third sort of assessment termed
Ryotwar is to fix a maximum of assessment upon all the lands
of the country [2. cf. 1831 C. 45, 65.] The money rent of each
individual oultivator for the fields in his occupation is defined
with as much permanency as possible, the aggregate of such
rents making the total assessment, which varies each year
with the increase or decrease of cultivation. Another main
principle of the Ryotwar system is to protect the rights of all
ryots or cultivators, as they now exist in every village, from
infringement: and to prevent all encroachment upon those
rights [3 cf. 1831. C. 5156 :] Thus, in the Ryotwar system,
the details of the interest of the respective Ryots are known
completely, and not at all in the zemindary system; and the
former effectually does what the latter proposes to do, but
never has done, and never can do, that is, fix an assessment
upon all lands in the country. Under the Ryotwar system,
the assessment goes from land to the aggregate : it respects
property of every class, that of the largest landholder, and
that of the smallest: it measures and assess every portion of
an estate, and thus facilitates the transfer of landed property,
as the first question when taken into market is—What is
the amount of public demand upon the land ? [4 cf. 1831 C.
4565, 4567, 4568.] The Ryotwar Settlement is applicable in
every state of things : where there are proprietors it may
be concluded with farmers or cultivators : it may be equally
made for the largest or for the smallest quantity of land,
for millions of acres or for only a few. The owner of a single
field may make his terms directly with the Government, and
turn to his cultivation, knowing that he cannot be called on
to pay more than a certain sum : for although the assessment
under this system varies according to the value of the land,
difference of soil, population, situation, and other localities :
and although inferior land, paying a lower assessment, becomes
PDF page 33 (printed page 18)
18 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
liable when sufficiently improved to pay the higher assessment,
there is nevertheless, a maximum for the best land beyond
which all produce is for the benefit of the landholder, and
there are remissions in cases of urgent distress. [1. cf. 1832
C.R. P. No. 20.] Another advantage which the Ryotwar system
possesses over the Zemindary is in the creation of a great body
of independent proprietors, instead of a few who are proprietors
only in name : and there is an advantage for the great mass of
the people, but in the case of the Zamindary they accumulate
for the benefit of the few, while in the Ryotwar system there
is also tendency in a considerable degree to the accumulation
of capital. [2. cf. 1831 C. 4577, 4578, 4579.]
Such was and is the system of land revenue in India under
the regime of the East India Company. A critical estimation
of the system we will reserve for the future.
The next important head of revenue is the Opium revenue.
The opium revenue yielded next in amount to the land revenue
and was levied in two different ways :
(1) “ By an exclusive system of cultivation and sale carried on
by the Government in Bengal.”
(2) “ By a high export duty levied in Bombay on opium
grown in the native states of Malwa and shipped from
Bombay.”
By Regulation VI of 1799 section 3, poppy cultivation was
prohibited in Bengal, and in the North-West Provinces by
Regulation XLI of 1803 Section 2.
“Annual engagements are entered into by the
Government with the Ryots in certain selected districts,
to sow a certain quantity of land with the white poppy,
under a system of pecuniary advances, the produce to
be delivered in the form of opium to the Government at
a fixed rate........The total net receipts from the opium
monopoly in Bengal amounted in 1856 to 2,767,136.”
The revenue derived from transit of opium has a pretty little
history : prior to 1831 the British used to buy the opium from the
native states (to keep a strict monopoly of the article) through
the Resident and hammer it out at Bombay or at Calcutta. But to
prevent the large smuggling into the Portuguese Settlements the
PDF page 34 (printed page 19)
19ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE OF THE EAST INDIA COMPANY
monopoly policy was given up in favour of the transit duties
recovered by way of “passes” at a specified rate to cover the
transportation cost to Bombay. The transit duty was at first
fixed at Rs. 175 per chest of 140 lbs. each. This process showed
a diminution in the returns, consequently the rate was reduced
to Rs. 125 per chest.
The conquest of Sindh closed the additional gate of smuggling
the opium into the Portuguese territories : consequently it
was hoped and rightly that a higher transit duty would give
added return as the change in the direction of the trade was
impossible. So in 1843 October, the rate was increased to
Rs. 200 per chest, in 1845 to Rs. 300 per chest and in 1847
to Rs. 400 per chest.
III. The Salt Tax
Salt is obtained in India in different ways and is taxed in
different ways in different parts of the country.
It is obtained either by boiling sea water as in Bengal,
or by solar evaporation as in Bombay and Madras or from
natural resources such as the salt mines in Punjab and the
salt lakes in Rajputana.
In Bengal the Company had a salt monopoly. It was
manufactured by the natives who contracted to deliver ail
manufactured salt to the Government at a fixed low price.
The Government then sold this quantity of salt at six different
agencies, Hidgelee, Tumlook, Chittagong, Hiracan, Cuttack,
Balasore and Khoredah, at a price which was composed of the
actual cost plus the additional amount equivalent to the duty
levied on imported salt. As a result of this “the average retail
price to the consumer” amounted to about a penny per pound.
The private manufacture of salt was also allowed at
Calcutta under a system of excise only equal in amount to
the import duty.
But on the recommendation of the select committee of the
House of Commons in 1836, there was introduced the system of
fixed prices, and open warehouses, at which the sales, instead
of being as before periodical “were constantly going on.”
In Madras, salt was manufactured on behalf of the
Government and was sold for internal consumption. The duty
on imported foreign salt was lowered from Rs. 3 per pound to
equal the difference between the cost price and the sale price
of the article.
PDF page 35 (printed page 20)
20 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
In Bombay the salt manufacture was handed over to the
individuals under the system of an excise duty equivalent to
the import duty on the article. The salt mines of Punjab were
worked by the Government and the salt was sold on the spot.
The North-West Provinces depended upon the Lower
Provinces of Bengal, the Sambhur Salt lake in Rajputana and
parts of western India for their supply of salt. The duties were
so arranged that the salt from all parts when it reached the
North-West Provinces tended to be equal in price.
IV. Customs
There were innumerable transit or inland duties levied at
every town and on every road in the shape of tolls. But they
were abolished in Bengal by Act 14 of 1836 : in Bombay by
Act 1 of 1838 : and in Madras by Act 6, of 1844 : and uniform
system of customs was established all through British India.
The evil effects of these inland transit duties will be discussed
later on.
There remained two sources of customs revenue :
(1) The sea customs on exports and imports, the former on
salt and indigo.
(2) The land customs levied mainly on articles crossing the
frontier lines between the native and British territories.
V. Besides the salt and opium monopolies the East India
Company had the tobacco monopolies as another source of
revenue.
VI. Abkarree or revenue obtained from the sale of monopolies
to sell spirits and liquors. Licences were sold to the highest
bidder who contracted to sell at his own price, the hours of
business and the location of the shop being regulated by the
Government.
VII. The Wheel-tax was levied upon hackneys, carts,
buggys, etc.
VIII. The “Sayer duties” was a collective name for
unclassified taxes. In different parts of the country it
included different taxes. Once it included the irregular
collections made by native revenue officers. In Madras
it included the transit duties, in Bengal the pilgrim tax
was included under this head. In the Deccan “this source
of revenue” was “divided into two great heads the first
denominated mohturfa, which embraces taxes on shops, trades,