Vol. 7 · pages 266–270
Who Were the Shudras?; The Untouchables
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 266 (printed page 247)
THE UNTOUCHABLES : UNTOUCHABILITY AMONG NON-HINDUS 247
PART I
A COMPARATIVE SURVEY
Chapter I. Untouchability Among Non-Hindus
Chapter II. Untouchability Among Hindus
PDF page 267
No text on this page (it may be blank, a title page or an image).
PDF page 268 (printed page 249)
THE UNTOUCHABLES : UNTOUCHABILITY AMONG NON-HINDUS 249
CHAPTER I
UNTOUCHABILITY AMONG NON-HINDUS
WHO are the Untouchables and what is the origin of Untouchability?
These are the main topics which it is sought to investigate and the
results of which are contained in the following pages. Before launching upon the investigation it is necessary to deal with certain
preliminary questions. The first such question is : Are the Hindus
the only people in the world who observe Untouchability? The second
is: If Untouchability is observed by Non-Hindus also how does
Untouchability among Hindus compare with Untouchability among
non-Hindus? Unfortunately no such comparative study has so far been
attempted. The result is that though most people are aware of the
existence of Untouchability among the Hindus they do not know what
are its unique features. A definite idea of its unique and distinguishing features is however essential not merely for a real understanding
of the position of the Untouchables but also as the best means of
emphasising the need of investigating into their origin.
It is well to begin by examining how the matter stood in Primitive
and Ancient Societies. Did they recognize Untouchability? At the
outset it is necessary to have a clear idea as to what is meant by
Untouchability. On this point, there can be no difference of opinion.
It will be agreed on all hands that what underlies Untouchability
is the notion of defilement, pollution, contamination and the ways
and means of getting rid of that defilement.
Examining the social life of Primitive Society 1 in order to find out
whether or not it recognized Untouchability in the sense mentioned
above there can be no doubt that Primitive Society not only did
believe in the notion of defilement but the belief had given rise to
a live system of well-defined body of rites and rituals.
1 The facts relating to pollution among non-Hindus are drawn from “Hastings
Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics”, Vol. X, Article Purification, pp. 455-504.
PDF page 269 (printed page 250)
DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES250
Primitive Man believed that defilement was caused by
(1) the occurrences of certain events;
(2) contact with certain things; and
(3) contact with certain persons.
Primitive Man also believed in the transmission of evil from one
person to another. To him the danger of such transmission was
peculiarly acute at particular times such as the performance of
natural functions, eating, drinking, etc. Among the events the
occurrence of which was held by Primitive Man as certain to cause
defilement included the following :—
(1) Birth
(2) Initiation
(3) Puberty
(4) Marriage
(5) Cohabitation
(6) Death
Expectant mothers were regarded as impure and a source of
defilement to others. The impurity of the mother extended to the child
also.
Initiation and puberty are stages which mark the introduction of
the male and the female to full sexual and social life. They were
required to observe seclusion, a special diet, frequent ablutions, use
of pigment for the body and bodily mutilation such as circumcision.
Among the American Tribes not only did the initiates observe a
special dietary but also took an emetic at regular intervals.
The ceremonies which accompanied marriage show that marriage
was regarded by the Primitive Man as impure. In some cases the
bride was required to undergo intercourse by men of the tribe as
in Australia or by the chief or the medicine man of the tribe as in
America or by the friends of the grooms as among the East African
Tribes. In some cases there takes place the tapping of the bride by
a sword by the bridegroom. In some cases, as among the Mundas,
there takes place marriage to a tree before marriage with the
bridegroom. All these marriage observances are intended to neutralize
and prepare the individual against the impurity of marriage.
To the Primitive Man the worst form of pollution was death. Not
only the corpse, but the possession of the belongings of the deceased
were regarded as infected with pollution. The widespread custom of
placing implements, weapons, etc., in the grave along with the corpse
PDF page 270 (printed page 251)
THE UNTOUCHABLES : UNTOUCHABILITY AMONG NON-HINDUS 251
indicates that their use by others was regarded as dangerous and
unlucky.
Turning to pollution arising out of contact with objects Primitive
Man had learned to regard certain objects as sacred and certain
others as profane. For a person to touch the sacred was to contaminate the sacred and to cause pollution to it. A most striking example
of the separation of the sacred and the profane in Primitive Society
is to be found among the Todas, the whole of whose elaborate ritual
and (it would not be too much to say) the whole basis of whose social
organisation is directed towards securing the ceremonial purity of the
sacred herds, the sacred dairy, the vessels, and the milk, and of those
whose duty it is to perform connected rites and rituals. In the dairy,
the sacred vessels are always kept in a separate room and the milk
reaches them only by transfer to and fro of an intermediate vessel
kept in another room. The dairyman, who is also the priest, is
admitted to office only after an elaborate ordination, which in effect
is a purification. He is thereby removed from the rank of ordinary
men to a state of fitness for sacred office. His conduct is governed
by regulations such as those which permit him to sleep in the village
and only at certain times, or that which entails that a dairyman who
attends a funeral should cease from that time to perform his sacred
function. It has, therefore, been conjectured that the aim of much
of the ritual is to avert the dangers of profanation and prepare or
neutralise the sacred substance for consumption by those who are
themselves unclean.
The notion of the sacred was not necessarily confined to objects.
There were certain classes of men who were sacred. For a person
to touch them was to cause pollution. Among the Polynesians, the
tabu character of a Chief is violated by the touch of an inferior,
although in this case the danger falls upon the inferior. On the other
hand, in Efate, the ‘sacred man’ who comes into contact with Namin
(ceremonial uncleanliness) destroys his sacredness. In Uganda, before
building a temple, the men were given four days in which to purify
themselves. On the other hand, the Chief and his belongings are very
often regarded as sacred and, therefore, as dangerous to others of
an inferior rank. In the Tonga island, anyone who touches a Chief
contacted tabu; it was removed by touching the sole of the foot of
a superior chief. The sacred quality of the chief in Malaya Peninsula
also resided in the Royal Regalia and anyone touching it was invited
with serious illness or death.