Vol. 9 · pages 21–25
What Congress and Gandhi Have Done to the Untouchables; Mr. Gandhi and the Emancipation of the Untouchables
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 21
Thacker & Co’s Editions :-
First Edition June 1945
Second Edition 1946
Government of Maharashtra’s
First Edition January 1991
PDF page 22
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
PREFACE .. .. i
CHAPTER I.–A STRANGE EVENT
Congress Takes Cognizance of the Untouchables .. 1
CHAPTER II.–A SHABBY SHOW
Congress Abandons Its Plan .. .. 19
CHAPTER III.–A MEAN DEAL
Congress Refuses to Part with Power .. .. 40
CHAPTER IV.–AN ABJECT SURRENDER
Congress Bets an Inglorious Retreat .. .. 103
CHAPTER V.–A POLITICAL CHARITY
Congress Plan to Kill by Kindness .. .. 126
CHAPTER VI.–A FALSE CLAIM
Does Congress Represent All ? .. .. 146
CHAPTER VII.–A FALSE CHARGE
Are Untouchables Tools of the British ? .. .. 166
CHAPTER VIII.–THE REAL ISSUE
What the Untouchables Want .. .. 181
CHAPTER IX.–A PLEA TO THE FOREIGNERS
Let not Tyranny Have Freedom to Enslave .. .. 199
CHAPTER X.–WHAT DO THE UNTOUCHABLES SAY?
Beware of Mr. Gandhi! .. .. 239
CHAPTER XI.–GANDHISM
The Doom of the Untouchables .. .. 274
APPENDICES .. .. 298
INDEX .. .. 384
NOTE ON THE ANNEXURE (added by the Editor) .. .. 437
CHAPTER IX (from the second edition of 1946) .. .. 439
MESSAGE v
PREFACE vii
CONTENTS
DISCOUNT POLICY ON SALE OF VOLUMES
PDF page 23
APPENDICES
Page
I. Correspondence between Swami Shradhnand and Pandit
Motilal Nehru, Secretary of the Indian National Congress
over the former’s resignation from the Congress Committee,
appointed in 1922 to draw up a Scheme for the Uplift of the
Untouchables .. 298
II. Supplementary Memorandum submitted to the Second
Session of the Round Table Conference on behalf of the
Untouchables in 1931. .. .. 304
III. The Minorities Pact submitted to the Minorities Committee
of the Round Table Conference in 1931. .. 307
IV. Statement on Mr. Gandhi’s Threat to Fast Unto Death
against the Prime Minister’s Award granting Separate
Electorates to the Untouchables. .. .. 311
V. Temple Entry in Travancore State .. .. 317
VI. Pronouncements by or on behalf of His Majesty’s Government
relating to the position of the Untouchables in any Scheme
for the Constitution of India .. .. .. 323
VII. Montagu-Chelmsford Report and the Simon Commssion on
the injustice caused by weightage to Muslims .. 332
VIII. Cripps Proposals of 1942 .. .. .. 334
IX. Objections to Cripps Proposals. .. .. 336
X. Correspondence between Lord Wavell and Mr. Gandhi in
July 1944 .. .. .. 343
XI. Resolutions passed by the Working Committee of the AllIndia Scheduled Castes Federation at its Meeting held in
Madras on 23rd September 1944. .. 346
XII. Population by Minorities in British India. .. 354
XIII. Population by Minorities in Indian States. .. 355
XIV. Particulars of Scheduled Castes Constituencies in regard to
seats and voting strength Province by Province. 356
XV. Particulars regarding elections to seats reserved for
Scheduled Castes Province by Province. .. 366
XVI. The Wavell Plan. .. .. .. 376
PDF page 24
PREFACE
“In 1892, there took place in England a new election
to Parliament, in which the Conservatives headed by Lord
Salisbury lost and the Liberals headed by Mr. Gladstone
won. The remarkable thing about this election was that
notwithstanding the defeat of his party at the polls, Lord
Salisbury—contrary to Parliamentary convention—refused to
surrender his office to the leader of the Liberal Party. When
Parliament assembled, the Queen delivered the usual gracious
speech from the throne containing the legislative programme
of Lord Salisbury’s Government and the usual address to Her
Majesty was moved from the Government side. Lord Salisbury’s
Government was an illegitimate Government. It was a challenge
to the fundamental principle of the British Constitution, which
recognised Parliamentary Majority as the only title deed for
a Party’s right to form a Government. The Liberals took up
the challenge and tabled an amendment to the address. The
amendment sought to condemn Lord Salisbury’s Government
for its insistence on continuing in office, notwithstanding the
fact that it had no majority behind it. The task of moving the
amendment was entrusted to the late Lord (then Mr.) Asquith.
In his speech in support of the amendment, Mr. Asquith used
the now famous phrase—“ Causa finita est: Roma locuta est.”
(Rome has spoken and the dispute must end). The phrase was
originally used by St. Augustine but in a different context.
It was used in the course of a religious controversy and
had come to be used as a foundation for Papal Sovereignty.
Mr. Asquith used it as a political maxim embodying the basic
principle of Parliamentary Democracy. Today it is accepted
as the fundamental principle on which Popular Government
rests, namely, the Right of a Political Majority to Rule. It told
instantaneously against Salisbury’s Government and must tell
against all parties who fail at the polls wherever Parliamentary
Democracy is in operation.
I was reminded of this maxim when the results of the
Elections to the Provincial Legislatures in India, which took
place in February 1937 under the Government of India Act,
1935, were announced. Congressmen did not actually say
“Causafinita est: India locuta est.” But so far as the parties,
which had opposed the Congress in the Elections, were con-
PDF page 25
ii
cerned, that is what the results of the Elections seemed to,
proclaim. Having led the Untouchables against the Congress :
for full five years in the Round Table Conference and in the
Joint Parliamentary Committee, I could not pretend to be
unaffected by the results of the Elections. To me the question
was : Had the Untouchables gone over to the Congress ? Such
a thing was to me unimaginable. For, I could not believe that
the Untouchables—apart from a few agents of the Congress
who are always tempted by the Congress gold to play the part
of the traitor—could think of going over to the Congress en
masse forgetting how Mr. Gandhi and the Congress opposed,
inch by inch up to the very last moment, every one of their
demands for political safeguards. I had therefore decided to
study the Returns of the election that took place in 1937.
While I was convinced that such a study was of great
necessity from the point of view of the Untouchables, the work
proceeded at a snail’s pace. This was due to three causes. The
work had to be kept aside for some time to give precedence to
other literary projects, the urgency of which demanded a degree
of priority which it was not possible to refuse. Secondly, the Blue
Book on the Election Results of 1937, which was submitted to
Parliament soon after the elections had taken place and which
is the primary source for figures regarding the elections, proved
inadequate and insufficient for my purpose. It does not give
separately figures showing how the Scheduled Castes electors
voted and how many votes the Scheduled Caste candidates got.
It gives figures showing how electors in different constituencies
voted, without making any distinction between Hindu voters
and the Scheduled Castes voters. Circular letters had therefore
to be issued to the various Provincial Governments requesting
them to send me the figures showing distribution of voting
by Scheduled Caste electors and the number of votes secured
by each Scheduled Caste candidate. This inevitably delayed
the work. Thirdly, the examination of these election returns
proved a very laborious task as the statistical tables given in
the Appendices to this book will show.
The work thus lingered on. I regret very much this delay.
For I know how much mischief has been done by the Congress
during the interval. The Congress has advertised the election
results to bolster up its claim to represent the Untouchables.
The main point in the advertisement is that out of 151 seats