Vol. 9 · pages 326–330
What Congress and Gandhi Have Done to the Untouchables; Mr. Gandhi and the Emancipation of the Untouchables
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 326
297
WHAT CONGRESS AND GANDHI HAVE DONE TO THE UNTOUCHABLES :
GANDHISM
blasted and blighted the life of the Untouchables are to be found
intact and untarnished in the bosom of Gandhism. How can the
Untouchables say that Gandhism is a heaven and not a chamber
of horrors as Hinduism has been ? The only reaction and a very
natural reaction of the Untouchables would be to run away from
Gandhism.
Gandhists may say that what I have stated applies to the old
type of Gandhism. There is a new Gandhism, Gandhism without
caste. This has reference to the recent statement 1 of Mr. Gandhi
that caste is an anachronism. Reformers were naturally gladdened
by this declaration of Mr. Gandhi. And who would not be glad to
see that a man like Mr. Gandhi having such terrible influence over
the Hindus, after having played the most mischievous part of a
social reactionary, after having stood out as the protagonist of the
caste system, after having beguiled and befooled the unthinking
Hindus with arguments which made no distinction between what
is fair and foul should have come out with this recantation ? But
is this really a matter for jubilation ? Does it change the nature
of Gandhism ? Does it make Gandhism a new and a better ‘ism’
than it was before. Those who are carried away by this recantation
of Mr. Gandhi, forget two things. In the first place all that
Mr. Gandhi has said is that caste is an anachronism. He does
not say it is an evil. He does not say it is anathema. Mr. Gandhi
may be taken to be not in favour of caste. But Mr. Gandhi
does not say that he is against the Varna system. And what is
Mr. Gandhi’s varna system ? It is simply a new name for the caste
system and retains all the worst features of the caste system.
The declaration of Mr. Gandhi cannot be taken to mean any
fundamental change in Gandhism. It cannot make Gandhism
acceptable to the Untouchables. The Untouchables will still have
ground to say : “Good God! Is this man Gandhi our Saviour?”
zz
1 Hindustan Times, 15th April 1945.
PDF page 327
APPENDIX I
SHRADHANAND ON BARDOLI PROGRAMME
FOR UNTOUCHABLES
Correspondence between Swami Shradhanand and Pandit
Motilal Nehru, General Secretary of the Congress, on the Congress
Sub-Committee appointed in 1922 to frame a Scheme for the uplift
of the Untouchables .
(1) SWAMIJI’S LETTER
The General Secretary,
All India Congress Committee,
Camp, Delhi.
I acknowledge, with thanks, receipt of your letters Nos. 331
and 332 embodying resolutions of the Working Committee and
of the All-India Congress Committee about Untouchability. I
observe with pain, that the resolution of the All India Congress
Committee, as at present worded, does not include the whole of
what was passed by the Committee.
The facts are these : I sent the following letter to Mr. Vithalbhai
Patel (the then) General Secretary on 23rd May 1922, which was
also published by the principal dailies of the country.
‘MY DEAR MR. PATEL,
There was a time (vide Young India of 25th May, 1921) when
Mahatmaji put the question of Untouchability in the forefront of the
Congress programme. I find now that the question of raising the
Depressed Classes has been relegated to an obscure corner. While
Khadi claims the attention of some of our best workers and a liberal
sum has been earmarked for it, for the year, while a strong subcommittee has been appointed to look after national education and
a special appeal for fund is to be made for the same, the question
of the removal of Untouchability has been shelved by making
small grants to Ahmedabad, Ahmednagar and Madras. I am of
opinion that with a majority of 6 crores of our brethren set against
us by the bureaucracy, even the Khadi Scheme cannot succeed
completely. The Members of the Working Committee, perhaps, do
not know that on this side, our suppressed brethern are leaving
off khadi and taking to buying cheap foreign cloth. I want to move
the following resolution in the meeting of the All-India Congress
Committee which comes off on the 7th of June next at Lucknow,
that a sub-committee consisting of three members of the All-India
Congress Committee be appointed to give effect to the resolution
about the so-called Depressed Classes, that a sum of five lakhs of
PDF page 328
299
WHAT CONGRESS AND GANDHI HAVE DONE TO THE UNTOUCHABLES :
APPENDIX I
rupees be placed at their disposal for propaganda work and that in
future all applications for grants be referred to the said subcommittee
for disposal.” My proposal was amended by the Working Committee
and ran as follows :—
“This Committee hereby appoints a committee consisting of
Swami Shradhanand, Mrs. Sarojini Naidu and Messrs. G. B.
Deshpande and I. K. Yajnik to formulate a scheme embodying
practical measures to be adopted for bettering the condition of
the so-called Untouchables throughout the country and to place
it for consideration before the next meeting of the Working
Committee, the amount to be raised for the scheme to be Rs. 2
lakhs for the present.”
Mr. Patel asked me to accept the Working Committee’s proposed
resolution in toto. I refused to accept the Working Committee’s
resolution and in the very first sitting of the All-India Congress
Committee substituted 5 lakhs for 2 lakhs with the condition that
one lakh of the same be allotted by the All-India Congress Committee
out of the funds in its hands, in cash and an appeal be made for
the balance.
Mr. Rajagopalachariar, on behalf of the Working Committee,
proposed that instead of fixing the amount to be allotted out of the
Congress funds now, it should be provided that when the Scheme was
accepted by the Working Committee that Committee should allot as
much cash as it could then spare for this purpose. I do not recollect
the exact words but the purport of the amendment as given above
is, to my knowedge, true.
On this an uproar arose and the query was pressed from all
sides that the cash balance in the hands of the All-India Congress
Committee ought to be announced. The President called me aside and
told me in confidence that the Congress possessed very little cash
balance and if pressed to disclose the true state of affairs it would
harm the movement, as outsiders and even C.I.D. people were also
present. On this I accepted the amendment of Mr. Rajagopalachariar
in spite of protests from my seconder and supporters. But my surprise
was great when I found the resolution in the dailies, as reported by
the Associated Press, shorn of Mr. Rajagopalachariar’s amendment.
After the above resolution was passed, some members suggested
that a convener of the sub-committee ought to be appointed and
several members proposed me as the convener. On this, Mr. Vithalbhai
Patel (the then General Secretary) got up and said : “As Swami
Shradhanand’s name occurs first, naturally he will be the convener
and therefore there was no need of moving any fresh resolution at all.”
Members from all parts of the country began to give information
to me about Untouchability in their provinces and pressed me to
visit their parts. On this, I made some promises. Then I thought
PDF page 329
300
DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR :
WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
that without some cash for preliminary expenses, no enquiries
on the spot could be made and hence no proper scheme could be
formulated. I also learnt that Rs. 25,000 had been voted by the
Working Committee for “the Independent” of Allahabad and that
an application for grant of Rs. 10,000 to the Urdu daily Congress
of Delhi had been placed by Hakim Ajmal Khan and Dr. Ansari
before the Working Committee. So, considering that after all, the
Congress might not be so hard pressed for cash, I wrote a letter
addressed to the President, asking him to give the Untouchability
Sub-Committee an advance of Rs. 10,000 for preliminary expenses.
After all this,- the following resolution of the Working Committee
forwarded by your letter No. 331 presents a very interesting
reading:—
“Read letter from Swami Shradhanand, dated 8th June 1922 for
an advance for drawing up a scheme for Depressed Class work—
Resolved that Mr. Gangadharrao B. Deshpande be appointed
convener of the sub-committee appointed for the purpose and he
be requested to convene a meeting at an early date, and that
Swami Shradhanand’s letter be referred to the Sub-Committee.”
There is another matter which is inexplicable. After my first
letter had been acknowledged, I addressed the following letter from
Hardwar on 3rd June 1922 :—
“MY DEAR MR. PATEL,
I shall leave Hardwar the day after tomorrow and reach Lucknow
on the morning of June 6th. You know by now, that I feel the most
for the so-called Depressed Classes. Even in the Punjab I find that
no attention worth the name has been paid to this item of the
constructive programme. In the U. P. of course it will be an uphill
work. But there is another very serious difficulty.
The Bardoli programme in its note under item (4) lays down
that where prejudice is still strong, separate wells and separate
schools must be maintained out of the Congress Funds. This leaves
a loophole for those Congress workers who are either prejudiced
against the Depressed Classes or are weak and no work can be done
in inducing people to agree to allow the Untouchables to draw water
from common wells. In the Bijnoor District, I learn there was no
restriction and the Untouchables drew water freely from common
wells. But in some places, fresh prejudice is being engendered under
the aegis of the Bardoli resolution note. In my recent visits to Ambala
Cant., Ludhiana, Batala, Lahore, Amritsar and Jandiala, I found
that the question of the removal of disabilities of the Untouchables
is being ignored. In and near Delhi, it is the Dalitodhar Sabha,
of which I am the president, rather than the Congress which is
doing appreciable work. I think that unless item (4) of the Bardoli
PDF page 330
301
WHAT CONGRESS AND GANDHI HAVE DONE TO THE UNTOUCHABLES :
APPENDIX I
constructive programme is amended in proper form, the work which
I consider to be the most important plank in the Congress programme,
will suffer.
Kindly place the following proposal before the President and if
he allows it to be placed before the next meeting, of the All-India
Congress Committee, I shall move it there—“Instead of the Note under
item (4) of the Bardoli resolution substitute the following note:—
“The following demands of the Depressed Classes ought to be
complied with at once, namely that ( a) they are allowed to sit on
the same carpet with citizens of other classes ; ( b) they get the
right to draw water from common wells and ( c) their children get
admission into National schools and Colleges and are allowed to
mix freely with students drawn from the so-called higher castes.”
I want to impress upon the members of the All-India Congress
Committee the great importance of this term. I know of cases where
the Depressed Classes are in open revolt against tyranny of the socalled upper castes and unless the above demands are conceded to
them, they will succumb to the machine of the bureaucracy.
After my first proposals were passed in the All-India Congress
Committee Meeting on June 7th at Lucknow, I asked Mr. Patel to
put my proposed amendment of Note to item (4) of Bardoli resolution
before the meeting. He told me that the Working Committee would
refer it to the Sub-Committee and asked me not to press it there.
I agreed. But I have not received copy of my resolution of the
Working Committee, referring my proposal to the Untouchability
Sub-Committee.
The Untouchability question is very acute in and near Delhi and
I have to grapple with it at once. But the Sub-Committee cannot
begin work off-hand because the Working Committee has to take
several other political situations in the country into consideration
before deciding upon any scheme of practical measures to be adopted
for uprooting Untouchability on behalf of the Congress. Under these
circumstances, I cannot be of any use to the Sub-Committee and beg
to resign from membership.
Yours sincerely,
Delhi, Jan. 30. SHRADHANAND SANYASI.
(2) SECRETARY’S REPLY
DEAR SWAMIJI,
Your letter, dated June 1922 received in my office on the 30th of
that month, has by a resolution of the Working Committee passed in
Bombay on the 18th instant been referred to me with instructions to
explain facts and request you to be good enough to reconsider your
resignation from the Depressed Classes Sub-Committee.