Vol. 9 · pages 466–470
What Congress and Gandhi Have Done to the Untouchables; Mr. Gandhi and the Emancipation of the Untouchables
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 466
Note
on
the Annexure
The present volume of ‘What Congress and Gandhi
have done to the Untouchables,’ is the reprint of the
first edition published in 1945. Dr. Ambedkar brought
out a second edition, in 1946. Certain changes by way
of substantial additions and improvements are noticed.
Chapter 9, which contains these changes is therefore
annexed to the Volume. No changes are noticed in the
remaining text.
The Editorial Committee is grateful to Shri G. P.
Mandavkar of Nagpur for bringing to our notice the
contents of the second edition.
PDF page 467
No text on this page (it may be blank, a title page or an image).
PDF page 468
CHAPTER IX
A PLEA TO THE FOREIGNER
Let not Tyranny Have Freedom to Enslave
I
IT is a matter of common experience that barring a few
exceptions, almost all foreigners, who show interest in Indian
political affairs, take the side of the Congress. This quite naturally
puzzles and annoys the other political parties in the country, such
as the Muslim League, claiming to represent the Musalmans,
the Justice Party—now in a state of suspended animation but
still—claiming to speak in the name of the non-Brahmins and the
All-India Scheduled Castes Federation, claiming to represent the
Untouchables, all of whom have been appealing to the foreigner
for support but to whom the foreigner is not even prepared to
give a sympathetic hearing. Why does the foreigner support the
Congress and not the other political parties in India ? Two reasons
are usually assigned by the foreigner for his behaviour. One
reason assigned by him for supporting the Congress is that it is
the only representative political organization of the Indians and
can speak in the name of India and even for the Untouchables.
Is such a belief founded on facts ?
It must be admitted that there have been circumstances which
are responsible for creating such a belief. The first and foremost
circumstance for the spread of this view is the propaganda by
the Indian Press in favour of the Congress. The Press in India
is an accomplice of the Congress, believes in the dogma that the
Congress is never wrong and acts on the principle of not giving
any publicity to any news, which is inconsistent with the Congress
prestige or the Congress ideology. To the foreigner the Press is
the principal medium of information about the Indian political
affairs. The cry of the Indian Press being what it is, there is
therefore no wonder if the people in England and America know
one thing and only one thing, namely, that the Congress is the
only representative body in India including even the Untouchables.
PDF page 469
440
DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR :
WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
The effect of this propaganda is considerably heightened
because of the absence of counter-propaganda on behalf of the
Untouchables to advertise their case against the Congress claim.
There are various explanations for this failure on the part of
the Untouchables.
The Untouchables have no Press. The Congress Press is
closed to them and is determined not to give them the slightest
publicity. They cannot have their own Press and for obvious
reasons. No paper can survive without advertisement revenue.
Advertisement revenue can come only from business and in
India all business, both high and small, is attached to the
Congress and will not favour any Non-Congress organization.
The staff of the Associated Press in India, which is the main
news distributing agency in India, is entirely drawn from the
Madras Brahmins—indeed the whole of the Press in India is in
their hands and they, for well-known reasons, are entirely proCongress and will not allow any news hostile to the Congress
to get publicity. These arc reasons beyond the control of the
Untouchables.
To a large extent the failure of the Untouchables to do
propaganda, it must be admitted, is also due to the absence of
will to do propaganda. This absence of will arises from a patriotic
motive not to do anything, which will damage the cause of the
country in the eyes of the world outside. There are two different
aspects to the politics of India, which may be distinguished as
foreign politics and constitutional politics. India’s foreign politics
relate to India’s freedom from British Imperialism, while the
constitutional politics of India centre round the nature of a
constitution for a free India. For a discriminating student the
two issues are really separate. But the Untouchables fear that
though the two aspects of India’s politics are separable, the
foreigner, who counts in this matter and whose misunderstanding
has to be guarded against, is not only incapable of separating
them but is very likely to mistake a quarrel over constitutional
politics for a disagreement over the ultimate purposes of India’s
foreign politics. This is why the Untouchables have preferred
to remain silent and allowed the Congress propaganda to go
unchallenged.
The Congressmen will not admit the patriotic motives of the
Untouchables in keeping silent over Congress propaganda which
is directed against them. The fact, however, remains that the
silence and the desire to avoid open challenge on the part of the
PDF page 470
441
WHAT CONGRESS AND GANDHI HAVE DONE TO THE UNTOUCHABLES :
A PLEA TO THE FOREIGNER
Untouchables have been materially responsible for the general
belief that the Congress represents all, even the Untouchables.
While, as explained above, there are circumstances which
are responsible for creating the belief that Congress represents
all including the Untouchables, such a belief is not warranted
by the facts as disclosed by the elections that took place in
1937. How the claim of the Congress to represent all has
been disproved by those elections, has already been described
in an earlier part of this book, both generally and also with
particular regard to the claim of the Congress to represent the
Untouchables. If the foreigner will make a note of it he will
see how wide the propaganda is from the facts.
At a time when the representative character of the
Congress was not put to test in an election it was excusable
for a foreigner to be carried away by propaganda. But the
matter has now been put to test in the elections that took
place in 1937. With the results of the elections available to
check the position, it may be hoped that the foreigners will
revise their view that the Congress represents all, including
the Untouchables, and that they will realize that the other
parties are equally representative of elements in the social life
of India which are outside the Congress and have therefore
the right to be heard.
II
There is another reason why the foreigner lends his
support to the Congress. It lies in the difference between the
demonstrative activities of the Congress and the other political
parties in the country. While he compares the activities of the
different political parties, he sees Congressmen engaged in a
conflict with the British Government, launching campaigns of
civil disobedience, breaking laws made by a foreign Government,
organizing movements for non-payment of taxes, courting
prison, preaching non-co-operation with Government, refusing
offices and exhibiting themselves in other ways as men out
to sacrifice themselves for the freedom of the country. On the
other hand, he sees the other political parties uninterested,
passive and taking no part in such a struggle. From this,
he concludes that the Congress is a body struggling for the
freedom of India, while the other parties are indifferent, if not
obstructive and as a lover of freedom feels bound to support.