Vol. 1 · pages 446–450
Castes in India, Annihilation of Caste, Linguistic States and other essays
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 446 (printed page 431)
STATES AND MINORITIES 431
Appendix III
DISADVANTAGES OF THE POONA PACT
1. The Poona Pact was intended to devise a method whereby the Scheduled
Castes would be able to return to the Legislature representatives of their
choice. This intention has been completely nullified as will be seen from
the following series of statistics. The series have been constructed from the
results of the last elections which took place in February 1946.
2. The statistical data is arranged in four series of tables :
First series show the votes secured by the successful Caste Hindu
candidate and the successful Scheduled Caste candidate in the Final
election.
Second series show in how many cases did reliance on reservation clause
become necessary for the success of the Scheduled Caste candidate
in the Final election and in how many he succeeded without the
benefit of reservation.
Third series show the relative voting strength of the Caste Hindus and
the Scheduled Castes in constituencies in which seats are reserved
for the Scheduled Castes.
Fourth series show the position in the Primary election of the Scheduled
Caste Candidates who became successful in the Final elections.
3. The conclusions that follow from these figures will not escape those
who care to examine them. The figures prove the following propositions :
(i) That every of the Scheduled Caste candidate who became successful
in the Final election owed his success to the votes of the caste Hindus
and not of the Scheduled Castes. A great many of them came to the
top of the poll and secured votes equal to and in some cases larger
than those obtained by Caste Hindu candidates ( See Tables in the
First Series). Secondly, in very few constituencies was the successful
Scheduled Caste candidate required to rely on reservation (See Tables
in the Second Series). This is a most unexpected phenomenon. Anyone
who compares the voting strength of the Scheduled Castes with the
voting strength of the Caste Hindus in the different constituencies
(See Tables in the Third Series) would realize that the voting strength
of the Scheduled Castes is so small that such a phenomenon could
never have occurred if only the Scheduled Castes voters had voted
for the Scheduled Caste candidates. That they have occurred is proof
positive that the success of the Scheduled Caste candidate in the
Final election is conditioned by the Caste Hindu votes.
(ii) That comparing the results of the Primary election with those of
the Final election ( See Tables in the Fourth series) the Scheduled
Caste candidate who was elected in the Final election was one
PDF page 447 (printed page 432)
432 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
who had failed in the Primary election (if the Primary election be
treated as a Final election and the constituency be treated as a
single-member constituency).
(iii) Owing to the extreme disparity between the voting strength of the
Hindus and the Scheduled Castes—disparity which will not disappear
even under adult suffrage—a system of joint electorates will not
succeed in giving the Scheduled Castes the chance of returning their
true representatives.
(iv) The Poona Pact has completely disfranchised the Scheduled Castes
inasmuch as candidates whom they rejected in the Primary elections—
which is a true index of their will—have been returned in the Final
election by the votes of the Caste Hindus.
The Poona Pact is thus fraught with mischief. It was accepted because
of the coercive fast of Mr. Gandhi and because of the assurance given at
the time that the Hindus will not interfere in the election of the Scheduled
Castes.
FIRST SERIES
Votes obtained by the successful Scheduled Caste candidates as compared
with the votes secured by the successful Caste Hindu candidates.
Page Nos.
Part I—Madras . . . . . . 433
Part II—Bengal . . . . . . 433-34
Part III—Bombay . . . . . . 434
Part IV—U.P. . . . . . . 435
Part V—C.P. . . . . . . 435
Part VI—Assam . . . . . . 436
Part VII—Orissa . . . . . . 436
PDF page 448 (printed page 433)
STATES AND MINORITIES 433
First Series
I. MADRAS
Name of the Constituency Seats Votes polled by
successful Hindu
candidates
Votes polled by
successful Scheduled
Caste candidates
1 23 4
1. Coconada .. .. 2 32,607 28,544
2. Ellore .. .. 2 37,618 38,195
3. Bandar .. .. 2 69,319 70,931
4. Ongole .. .. 2 50,906 49,992
5. Penukonda .. .. 2 17,406 18,125
6. Kurnool .. .. 2 32,756 32,294
7. Chingleput .. .. 2 13,865 15,129
8. Thiruvalur .. .. 2 17,225 17,818
9. Ranipet .. .. 2 21,249 21,059
10. Tiruvannamalai .. .. 2 31,476 32,132
11. Tindivanam .. .. 2 25,626 25,442
12. Chidambaram .. .. 2 15,272 14,874
13. Tanjore .. .. 2 26,904 16,133
14. Mannargudi .. .. 2 29,932 30,116
15. Ariyalur .. .. 2 22,656 20,520
16. Sattur .. .. 2 30,988 29,530
17. Malapuram .. .. 2 28,229 28,085
18. Namakkal .. .. 2 15,433 15,085
II. BENGAL
Name of the Constituency Seats Votes polled
by successful
Hindu
candidates
Votes polled
by successful
Scheduled Caste
candidates
1 2 3 45
1. Burdwan Central .. 2 42,858 33,903 . . . .
2. Burdwan, North-West .. 2 32,270 25,723 . . . .
3. Birbhum .. .. 2 24,629 20,252 . . . .
4. Bankura, West .. 2 30,388 21,266 . . . .
5. Thurgram-cum-Ghatal .. 2 40,900 19,060 . . . .
6. Hooghly, North-East .. 2 26,132 18,768 . . . .
7. Howrah .. .. 2 40,608 36,099 . . . .
8. 24 Parganas, South-East .. 2 50,345 38,459 . . . .
9. 24 Parganas, North-West .. 2 45,339 48,272 . . . .
10. Nadia .. .. 2 30,489 28,054 . . . .
11. Murshidabad .. .. 2 32,386 26,958 . . . .
12. Jessore .. .. 2 38,665 41,434 . . . .
PDF page 449 (printed page 434)
434 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
II. BENGAL
Name of the Constituency Seats Votes polled
by successful
Hindu
candidates
Votes polled
by successful
Scheduled Caste
candidates
1 2 3 45
13. Khulna .. .. 3 79,218 57,724 44,043
14. Malda .. .. 2 32,728 12,796 . . . .
15. Dinajpur .. .. 3 46,146 35,127 30,839
16. Jalpaiguri-cum -Siliguri .. 3 30,950 26,109 13,829
17. Rangpur .. .. 3 46,869 29,657 23,237
18. Bogra- cum-Pabna .. 2 43,249 31,515 . . . .
19. Dacca, East .. .. 2 51,808 31,392 . . . .
20. Mymensingh, West .. 2 37,983 32,782 . . . .
21. Mymensingh, East .. 2 43,678 32,207 . . . .
22. Faridpur .. .. 2 70,115 51,450 29,503
23. Bakargunj .. .. 2 48,560 28,560 . . . .
24. Tippera .. .. 2 60,146 59,051 . . . .
III. BOMBAY
Name of the Constituency Seats Votes secured by
successful
Hindu candidates
Votes
secured by
successful
Scheduled
Caste
candidates
1 23 4 5 6
1. Bombay City (Suburban) 3 57,182 47,835 . . . . 59,646
2. Bombay City (Byculla) .. 3 42,143 41,795 . . . . 43,251
3. Kaira District .. .. 4 68,044 63,422 57,394 69,807
4. Surat District .. .. 4 40,232 39,985 39,610 39,849
5. Thana, South .. .. 3 30,581 27,587 . . . . 11,630
6. Ahmednagar, South .. 3 25,747 20,948 . . . . 20,908
7. East Khandesh, East .. 4 38,721 34,349 33,960 36,136
8. Nasik, West .. .. 4 37,218 36,794 36,555 42,604
9. Poona, West .. .. 3 23,758 23,454 . . . . 24,709
10. Satara, North .. 4 44,315 42,727 41,474 43,961
11. Sholapur, North-East .. 3 19,380 16,705 . . . . 18,264
12. Belgaum, North .. 4 55,787 50,759 49,867 27,682
13. Bijapur, North .. 3 23,083 20,838 . . . . 16,059
14. Kolaba District .. 4 41,012 38,864 35,633 17,676
15. Ratnagiri, North .. 4 13,640 10,985 10,372 11,734
PDF page 450 (printed page 435)
STATES AND MINORITIES 435
IV. UNITED PROVINCES
Name of the Constituency Seats Votes polled by
successful Hindu
candidates
Votes polled by
successful Scheduled
Caste candidates
1 23 4
1. Lucknow City .. 2 24,614 14,110
2. Cawnpore City .. 2 34,550 34,782
3. Agra City .. 2 17,446 16,343
4. Allahabad City .. 2 19,870 10,308
5. Badaun District .. 2 6,716 14,037
6. Jalaun District .. 2 21,692 15,363
7. Basti District .. 2 14,450 15,447
8. Almora District .. 2 36,371 20,605
9. Rai Bareilli .. 2 15,917 1,889
10. Sitapur District .. 2 28,665 20,204
11. Gonda District .. 2 17,949 13,447
V. CENTRAL PROVINCES
Name of the Constituency Seats Votes polled by
successful Hindu
candidates
Votes polled by
successful Scheduled
Caste candidates
1 23 4
1. Nagpur City .. 2 21,905 23,595
2. Nagpur-Umred .. 2 8,330 7,847
3. Hinganghat-Wardha .. 2 11,677 10,781
4. Chanda-Brahmapuri .. 2 10,208 8,144
5. Chindwara-Sansad .. 2 16,365 6,190
6. Saugor-Khurai .. 2 7,829 5,162
7. Raipur .. 2 8,183 6,112
8. Baloda Bazar .. 2 21,861 9,659
9. Bilaspur .. 2 13,109 6,030
10. Mungeli .. 2 9,600 6,418
11. Tanjgir .. 2 11,914 7,419
12. Drug .. 2 5,975 5,593
13. Bhandara-Sakoli .. 2 16,824 10,491
14. Yeotmal-Daresha .. 2 10,915 4,719
15. Ellichpur .. 2 16,298 4,592
16. Chikhli-Mehkar .. 2 16,397 2,748
17. Akola-Balapur .. 2 6,455 5,567