Vol. 10 · pages 791–795
As Member of the Governor-General's Executive Council, 1942–46
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 791 (printed page 770)
770 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
(ii) the Delhi Central Electric Power Authority Board, and
(iii) the Central Electric Power Control Board ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : (i) The Central Electricity
Board is the authority set up under section 36-A of the Indian
Electricity Act, 1910, for making rules under Section 37 of that Act.
(ii) The Delhi Central Electric Power Authority Ltd., is a private
company and acts as a Central Organisation in Delhi Province for
the generation or purchase in bulk of electric energy and for its
distribution to bulk consumers, i.e. those who undertake to consume
or to pay for not less than 5,00,000 units per annum.
(iii) The functions of the Central Electric Power Control Board are :
(a) to advise the Government of India regarding any measure
of control to be applied to the supply of electricity by any
public electricity supply undertaking;
(b) to administer such control, as may have been approved by
the Government of India in the case of any public electric
supply undertaking and, in particular, to issue permits
for new supplies of electricity or for restriction of existing
supplies in accordance with the general principles laid
down by the Government of India;
(c) to collect such information from public electricity supply
undertakings as it considers necessary in order to be in a
position to advise Government regarding the necessities of
control and as to the areas in which surplus electric power
is likely to be available; and
(d) to collect such information as may be required to assist
in co-ordinating the development and utilization of electric
power on the best lines in furtherance of the general
interests of the war effort and industrial development of
India.
204
* Electricity Charges paid by Consumers in
Shahdara, Delhi
225. Mr. Muhammad Azhar Ali: Will the Honourable Member
for Labour please state :
(a) if it is a fact that (i) the Central Electricity Board,
(ii) the Delhi Central Electric Power Authority Board, and
* Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. III of 1944, 30th March 1944, pp. 1757-58.
PDF page 792 (printed page 771)
771L. A. DEBATES (CENTRAL) QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
(iii) the Central Electric Power Control Board have
supervision, power and control on the supply of
electric to Shahdara town;
(b) if it is a fact that the Pitkeathly Report recommended
a uniform charge for current consumption within the
Province of Delhi;
(c) if it is a fact that the licence granted to the Upper Jumna
Valley Electricity Company, Limited, for distribution
of current to Shahdara town was on a date before the
Pitkeathly Report; if so, the reasons for not amending
the licence on the recommendations of that Report
and reducing the charges from annas-/6/- per unit to
annas-/4/- per unit; and
(d) whether Government propose to give the licence for
distribution to a company whose service will be less
expensive by inviting tenders; if not, why not ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : (a) Assuming that
the Honourable Member’s reference to the supervision, power
and control on the supply of electricity to Shahdara town, is
in regard to the conditions and rates of supply, the authorities
mentioned are not responsible in the matter.
(b) No.
(c) First Part—Yes. Second Part—The Report did not
recommend that the licence be amended.
(d) Until such time as it is found possible to give a supply of
energy to the Shahdara licensee from the Central Power House
in Delhi, the rates which the Shahdara licensee is charging (and
which are within the terms of his licence) cannot be regarded
as excessive, and there can be no question of giving a second
distribution licence to any person for this area.
205
* Electricity Charges paid by Consumers in
Shahdara, Delhi
226. Mr. Muhammad Azhar Ali : Will the Honourable
Member for Labour please state :
(a) if it is a fact that the Upper Jumna Valley Electricity
Company, Limited, pays the United Provinces
Government for the supply at annas -/2/6 per unit;
* Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. III of 1944, 30th March 1944, p. 1758.
PDF page 793 (printed page 772)
772 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
(b) if it is a fact that the said Company charges the
consumers of Shahdara town at annas -/6/- per unit;
(c) at what rate the Company calculate the operating
charges; and
(d) the number of consumers in each year from 1939,
together with the amount of expenditure in each year
for the maintenance of services by the said Company ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : (a) and (b) Yes.
(c) Government have no information.
(d) A statement giving the number of consumers is appended.
The expression “expenditure for the maintenance of services” is
not sufficiently definite to enable any figures to be given.
Number of consumers
Year ending 31st March 1939 … … 114
Year ending 31st March 1940 … … 118
Year ending 31st March 1941 … … 131
Year ending 31st March 1942 … … 141
Year ending 31st March 1943 … … 143
206
* The Factories (Second Amendment) Bill
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar (Labour Member):
Sir, I beg to move for leave to introduce a Bill further to amend
the Factories Act, 1934 (Second Amendment).
Mr. President (The Honourable Sir Abdur Rahim) : The
question is :
“That leave be granted to introduce a Bill further to amend
the Factories Act, 1934 (Second Amendment).”
The motion was adopted.
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : Sir, I introduce
the Bill.
* Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. III of 1944, 3rd April 1944, p. 1870.
PDF page 794 (printed page 773)
773L. A. DEBATES (CENTRAL) QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
207
* Closing of Arches between Quarters on Irwin
Road, New Delhi
771. Mr. Muhammed Azhar Ali: (a) Is the Honourable the
Labour Member aware that sometime back some of the passengers
(arches) in between the Government quarters situated on the
Irwin Road, New Delhi, were closed for vehicular traffic, etc.?
(b) Is the Honourable Member aware that some of these
have been closed by erecting small pillars of cements and others
by putting up a revolving iron bar gate fixed in a ‘V’ type of
structures ?
(c) What is the object and utility of putting up these iron
bar gates when ‘V’ type of structures can easily block the way
for vehicular traffic ?
(d) Is the Honourable Member further aware that children
while playing get hurt—sometimes very seriously—by these iron
bar gates ?
(e) Does the Honourable Member propose to consider the
desirability of getting these iron gates removed immediately and
have them utilized in some other way ? If not, why not ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: (a) Yes.
(b) Yes.
(c) To stop cycle traffic.
(d) No.
(e) Government will be prepared to consider the suggestion
of the Honourable Member.
208
@ Absence of Muslim Officers in Central
Stationery Office
773. Mr. Muhammad Nauman : (a) Is the Honourable the
Labour Member aware that none of the officers in the Central
Stationery Office is a Muslim ?
* Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. III of 1944, 4th April 1944, p. 1914.
@Ibid., p. 1915.
PDF page 795 (printed page 774)
774 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
(b) Is it also a fact that a new post of Assistant Controller,
Stationery, has been recently sanctioned and has not yet been
filled up ? If so, does the Honourable Member propose to reserve
it for a Muslim ? If not, why not ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : (a) Yes.
(b) The answer to the first part of the question is in the
affirmative. The answer to the second part is that the post would
be filled according to the communal representation rules.
209
* Desirability of Posting a Technical Officer
to the Office of Controller of
Printing and Stationery
774. Mr. Muhammad Nauman : Will the Honourable the
Labour Member please say:
(a) whether it is a fact that the work in the Government
of India Presses is of a technical nature;
(b) Whether it is also a fact that none of the officers at the
headquarters’ office of the Controller of Printing and
Stationery is an officer drawn from the technical side;
and
(c) if the replies to parts (a) and (b) are in the affirmative,
whether he proposes to consider the desirability of
posting a technical officer to the Controller’s Office ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : (a) Yes, mostly.
(b) Yes.
(c) No, because detailed technical supervision and scrutiny
of printing work is not necessary in his office.
210
@ Government Contribution to Indian Labour
Federation
776. Mr. Lalchand Navalrai: (a) Will the Honourable Member for
Labour be pleased to state whether it is a fact that his Department makes
* Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. III of 1944, 4th April 1944, p. 1915.
@ Ibid., pp. 1915-16.