Vol. 11 · pages 336–340
The Buddha and His Dhamma
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 336
317
RELIGION AND DHAMMA
IV
13. Society has to choose one of the three
alternatives.
14. Society may choose not to have any Dhamma, as
an instrument of Government. For Dhamma is nothing
if it is not an instrument of Government.
15. This means Society chooses the road to anarchy.
16. Secondly, Society may choose the police, i.e.,
dictatorship as an instrument of Government.
17. Thirdly, Society may choose Dhamma plus
the Magistrate wherever people fail to observe the
Dhamma.
18. In anarchy and dictatorship liberty is lost.
19. Only in the third liberty survives.
20. Those who want liberty must therefore have
Dhamma.
21. Now what is Dhamma ? and why is Dhamma
necessary ? According to the Buddha, Dhamma consists
of Prajna and Karuna.
22. What is Prajna ? And why Prajna ? Prajna is
understanding. The Buddha made Prajna one of the
two corner-stones of His Dhamma because he did not
wish to leave any room for superstition.
23. What is Karuna? And why Karuna? Karuna
is love. Because, without it Society can neither live
nor grow, that is why the Buddha made it the second
corner-stone of His Dhamma.
24. Such is the definition of the Buddha’s Dhamma.
25. How different is this definition of Dhamma
from that of Religion.
26. So ancient, yet so modern is the definition of
Dhamma given by the Buddha.
27. So aboriginal yet so original.
28. Not borrowed from anyone, yet so true.
29. A unique amalgam of Pradnya and Karuna is
the Dhamma of the Buddha.
30. Such is the difference between Religion and
Dhamma.
PDF page 337 (printed page 318)
318 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
IV
§ 3. The Purpose of Religion and the
Purpose of Dhamma
1. What is the purpose of Religion ? What is the
purpose of Dhamma ? Are they one and the same ? Or
are they different ?
2. The answer to these questions are to be found
in two dialogues—one between the Buddha and
Sunakkhatta and the other between the Buddha and
the Brahmin Potthapada.
3. The Exalted One was once staying among the
Mallas at Anupiya, one of their towns.
4. Now the Exalted One having robed himself in
the early morning, put on his cloak and took his bowl
and entered the town for alms.
5. On the way he thought it was too early to go
for alms. Therefore he went to the pleasance where
Bhaggava the wanderer dwelt and called on him.
6. On seeing the Blessed One Bhaggava got up,
saluted him and said, “May it please you, sire, to be
seated ; here is a seat made ready for you.”
7. The Exalted One sat down thereon, and Bhaggava
taking a certain low stool sat down beside him. So
seated, Bhaggava, the wanderer, spake thus to the
Exalted One :
8 “Some days ago, Lord, a good many days ago,
Sunakkhatta of the Licchavis called on me and spake
thus: ‘I have now given up the Exalted One, Bhaggava.
I am remaining no longer under him (as my teacher).’
Is the fact really so, just as he said ?”
9. “It is just so Bhaggava, as Sunakkhatta of the
Licchavis said,” replied the Blessed One.
10. “Some days ago, Bhaggava, a good many days
ago, Sunakkhatta, the Licchavi, came to call on me,
and spake thus : ‘Sir, I now give up the Exalted One.
I will henceforth remain no longer under him (as my
teacher).’ When he told me this, I said to him : ‘But
now, Sunakkhatta, have I ever said to you, Come,
Sunakkhatta, live under me (as my pupil) ?’
11. “ ‘No, sir, you have not.’
PDF page 338
319
RELIGION AND DHAMMA
IV
12. “Or have you ever said to me: ‘Sir, I would fain
dwell under the Exalted One (as my teacher) ?’
13. “ ‘No, sir, I have not.’
14. “Then I asked him ‘If I said not the one, and
you said not the other, what are you and what am I
that you talk of giving up? See, foolish one, in how far
the fault here is your own.’
15. “ ‘Well, but, sir, the Exalted One works me no
mystic wonders surpassing the power of ordinary men.’
16. “Why, now Sunakkhatta, have I ever said to you:
‘Come, take me as your teacher, Sunakkhatta, and I
will work for you mystic wonders surpassing the power
of ordinary men ?’
17. “ ‘You have not, sir.’
18. “Or have you ever said to me: ‘Sir, I would fain
take the Exalted One as my teacher, for he will work
for me mystic wonders beyond the powers of ordinary
men ?’
19. “ ‘I have not, sir.’
20. “ ‘But if I said not the one, and you said not the
other, what are you and what am I, foolish man, that
you talk of giving up ? What think you, Sunakkhatta?
Whether mystic wonders beyond the power of ordinary
man are wrought, or whether they are not is the object
for which I teach the Dhamma: that it leads to the
thorough destruction of ill for the doer thereof ? ’
21. “ ‘ Whether, sir, they are so wrought or not, that
is indeed the object for which the Dhamma is taught
by the Exalted One.’
22. “ ‘If then, Sunakkhatta, it matters not to that
object whether mystic wonders are wrought or not, of
what use to you would be the working of them ? See,
foolish one, in how far the fault here is your own.’
23. “ ‘But, sir, the Exalted One does not reveal to
me the beginning of things.’
24. “Why now, Sunakkhatta, have I ever said to you:
‘Come, Sunakkhatta, be my disciple and I will reveal
to you the beginning of things ?’
25. “ ‘Sir, you have not’
PDF page 339 (printed page 320)
320 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
IV
26. “Or have you ever said to me: ‘I will become
the Exalted One’s pupil, for he will reveal to me the
beginning of things ?’
27. “ ‘Sir, I have not.’
28. “ ‘But if I have not said the one and you have
not said the other, what are you and what am I, foolish
man, that you talk of giving up on that account ? What
think you, Sunakkhatta? Whether the beginning of
things be revealed, or whether it be not, is the object
for which I teach the Dhamma that it leads to the
thorough destruction of ill for the doer thereof ?’
29. “ ‘Whether, sir, they are revealed or not, that
is indeed the object for which the Dhamma is taught
by the Exalted One.’
30. “ ‘If then, Sunakkhatta, it matters not to that
object whether the beginning of things be revealed, or
whether it be not, of what use to you would it be to
have the beginning of things revealed ?’ ”
31. This illustrates that Religion is concerned with
revealing the beginning of things and Dhamma is not.
(2)
The other differences between Religion and Dhamma
are brought out in the discussion between the Blessed
One and Potthapada.
1. The Blessed One was once staying at Shravasti
in Anathapindika’s pleasance of the Jeta’s wood. Now
at that time Potthapada, the wandering mendicant was
dwelling in the hall put up in Queen Mallika’s park for
a debate on general systems of philosophical opinion.
2. There was with him a great following of
mendicants; to wit, three hundred. A dialogue took place
between the Blessed Lord and Potthapada. Potthapada
asked :
3. “Then, sir, if that be so, tell me at least : ‘Is the
world eternal ? Is this alone the truth, and any other
view mere folly ?’ ”
4. “That, Potthapada, is a matter on which I
have expressed no opinion,” replied the Blessed Lord.
PDF page 340
321
RELIGION AND DHAMMA
IV
5. Then, in the same terms, Potthapada asked each
of the following questions :
(i) ‘Is the world not eternal ?’
(ii) ‘Is the world finite ?’
(iii) ‘Is the world infinite ?’
(iv) ‘Is the soul the same as the body ?’
(v) ‘Is the soul one thing, and the body another ?’
(vi) ‘Does one who has gained the truth live again
after death ?’
(vii) ‘Does he not live again after death ?’
(viii) ‘Does he both live again and not live again, after
death ?’
(ix) ‘Does he neither live again, nor not live again,
after death?’
6. And to each questions the Exalted One made the
same reply :—
7. “That too, Potthapada, is a matter on which I
have expressed no opinion.”
8. “But why has the Exalted One expressed no
opinion on that ?”
9. “Because this question is not calculated to profit, it
is not concerned with the Dhamma, it does not redound
even to the elements of right conduct, nor to detachment,
nor to purification from lusts, nor to quietude, nor to
tranquillisation of heart, nor to real knowledge, nor to
the insight (of the higher stages of the Path), nor to
Nirvana. Therefore is it that I express no opinion upon it.”
10. “Then what is it that the Exalted One has
determined ?”
11. “I have expounded, Potthapada, what Dukkha
is ; I have expounded what is the origin of Dukkha;
I have expounded what is the cessation of Dukkha : I
have expounded what is the method by which one may
reach the cessation of Dukkha.”
12. “And why has the Exalted One put forth a
statement as to that ?”
13. “Because that question, Potthapada, is calculated
to profit, is concerned with the Dhamma, redounds
to the beginnings of right conduct, to detachment,
to purification from lusts, to quietude, to tran-