Vol. 13 · pages 126–130
The Principal Architect of the Constitution of India
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 126
No text on this page (it may be blank, a title page or an image).
PDF page 127
No text on this page (it may be blank, a title page or an image).
PDF page 128
REGISTERED No. L. 8181
EXTRAORDINARY
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
NEW DELHI, THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 1948
CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY OF INDIA.
New Delhi, the 26th February, 1948.
No. CA/99/Cons./47.—The Draft Constitution of India,
as settled by the Drafting Committee of the Constituent
Assembly, together with a letter from the Chairman of the
Committee to the President of the Constituent Assembly,
is hereby published for general information. The Draft
will be taken into consideration at the next session of the
Constituent Assembly:—
New Delhi, 21st February, 1948.
To
The Hon’ble The PRESIDENT of the
Constituent Assembly of India, New Delhi.
Dear Sir,
Introductory.—On behalf of the Drafting Committee
appointed by the resolution of the Constituent Assembly
of August 29, 1947, I submit herewith the Draft of the
new Constitution of India as settled by the Committee.
Although I have been authorized to sign the Draft on
behalf of the members of the Committee, I should make
it clear that not all the members were present at all
the meetings of the Committee. But at every meeting at
which any decision was taken the necessary quorum was
present and the decisions were either unanimous or by a
majority of those present.
127
PDF page 129
In preparing the Draft the Drafting Committee
was of course expected to follow the decisions taken
by the Constituent Assembly or by the various Com-
mittees appointed by the Constituent Assembly.
This the Drafting Committee has endeavoured to do
as far as possible. There were however some
matters in respect of which the Drafting Committee
felt it necessary to suggest certain changes. All
such changes have been indicated in the Draft by
underlining or side-lining the relevant portions.
Care has also been taken by the Drafting Committee
to insert a footnote explaining the reasons for every
such change. I however think that, having regard
to the importance of the matter, I should draw
your attention and the attention of the Constituent
Assembly to the most important of these changes.
2. Preamble.—The Objectives Resolution adopted
by the Constituent Assembly in January, 1947,
declares that India is to be a Sovereign Indepen-
dent Republic. The Drafting Committee has adopted
the phrase Sovereign Democratic Republic, because
independence is usually implied in the word
”Sovereign”, so that there is hardly anything to
be gained by adding the word “Independent”, The
question of the relationship between this Democratic
Republic and the British Commonwealth of Nations
remains to be decided subsequently.
The Committee has added a clause about frater-
nity in the preamble, although it does not occur in
the Objectives Resolution. The Committee felt
that the need for fraternal concord and goodwill in
India was never greater than now and that this
particular aim of the new Constitution should be
emphasised by special mention in the preamble.
In other respects the Committee has tried to
embody in the preamble the spirit and, as far as
possible, the language of the Objectives Resolution.
Article 1 3. Description of India.—In article 1 of the
Draft, India has been described as a Union of States.
For uniformity the Committee has thought it desirable
to describe the Units of the Union in the new
Constitution as States, whether they are known at
128 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY, FEB. 26,1948
96 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
PDF page 130
present as Governors’ Provinces, or Chief Commis-
sioners’ Provinces or Indian States. Some difference
between the Units there will undoubtedly remain
even in the new Constitution; and in order to mark
this difference, the Committee has divided the States
into three classes: those enumerated in Part I of the
First Schedule, those enumerated in Part II, and
those enumerated in Part III. These correspond
respectively to the existing Governors’ Provinces,
Chief Commissioners’ Provinces and Indian States.
It will be noticed that the Committee has used
the term Union instead of Federation. Nothing
much turns on the name, but the Committee has pre-
ferred to follow the language of the preamble to the
British North America Act, 1867, and considered
that there are advantages in describing India as a
Union although its Constitution may be federal in structure.
Articles 5 & 6 4. Citizenship.—The Committee has given
anxious and prolonged consideration to the question of
citizenship of the Union. The Committee has thought
it necessary that, in order to be a citizen of the Union
at its inception, a person must have some kind of
territorial connection with the Union whether by
birth, or descent, or domicile. The Committee
doubts whether it will be wise to admit as citizens
those who, without any such connection with the
territory of India, may be prepared to swear allegi-
ance to the Union; for if other States were to copy
such a provision, we might have within the Union a
large number of persons who, though born and
permanently resident therein, would owe allegiance
to a foreign State. The Committee has, however,
kept in view the requirements of the large number of
displaced persons who have had to migrate to India
within recent months, and has provided for them
a specially easy mode of acquiring domicile and,
thereby citizenship. What they have to do (assum-
ing that they or either of their parents or any of
their grand-parents were born in India or Pakistan)
is—
(a) to declare before a District Magistrate in
India that they desire to acquire a domi-
cile in India, and
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY, FEB. 26,1948 129
97THE DRAFT CONSTITUTION