Vol. 13 · pages 131–135
The Principal Architect of the Constitution of India
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 131
(b) to reside in India for at least a month before
the declaration.
Articles
7 to 27
5. Fundamental Rights.—The Committee has
attempted to make these rights and the limitations
to which they must necessarily be subject as definite
as possible, since the courts may have to pronounce
upon them.
Article 59 6. Powers of the President of the Union.—The
Committee has considered it desirable to provide
that the President should have power to suspend,
remit or commute death sentences passed in an
Indian State, as in other Units, without prejudice
to the powers of the Ruler.
Article 278 It will be remembered that the new Constitution
empowers the Governor, in certain circumstances,
to issue a proclamation suspending certain provi-
sions of the Constitution; he can do so only for a
period of two weeks and is required to report the
matter to the President. The Committee has provid-
ed that upon receipt of the report the President may
either revoke the proclamation or issue a fresh pro-
clamation of his own, the effect of which will be to
put the Central Executive in the place of the State
Executive and the Central Legislature in the place
of the State Legislature. In fact, the State con-
cerned will become a centrally administered area
for the duration of the proclamation. This replaces
the “Section 93 regime” under the Act of 1935.
Article 60 7. Executive Power in respect of Concurrent
List subjects.—Under the present Constitution,
executive authority in respect of a Concurrent
List subject vests in the Province subject in certain
matters to the power of the Centre to give direc-
tions as to how the executive authority shall be exer-
cised, vide Parts I & II of the Concurrent Legisla-
tive List in the Seventh Schedule to the Govern-
ment of India Act, 1935. In the Draft Constitu-
tion the Committee has departed slightly from this
plan and has provided that the executive power
shall vest in the Province (now called the State)
”save as expressly provided in this Constitution or
by any law made by Parliament.” The effect of this
saving clause is that it will be open to the Union
130 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY, FEB. 26,1948
98 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
PDF page 132
Parliament under the new Constitution to confer
executive power on Union authorities, or, if neces-
sary, to empower Union authorities to give directions
as to how executive power shall be exercised by State
authorities. In making this provision the Com-
mittee has kept in view the principle that executive
authority should for the most part be co-extensive
with legislative power.
Article 67 8. Composition of the Council of States.—
According to a decision taken by the Constituent
Assembly, the Council of States was to contain not
more than 25 members (out of a total not exceed-
ing 250) to be elected from panels or constituencies
on a functional basis. The panel system having
hitherto proved unsatisfactory in the country from
which it was copied (Ireland), the Committee
has thought it best to provide for 15 members to be
nominated by the President for their special know-
ledge or practical experience in Literature, Art,
Science, etc. The Committee considers that no special
representation for labour or commerce and industry
among these nominations is necessary, in view
of the fact that they are certain to be adequate-
ly represented in the elected element of the Union
Parliament owing to adult suffrage.
Articles 63
and 151.
9. Duration of Union Parliament and of State
Legislatures.—The Committee considers that under
the parliamentary system, particularly at the
beginning of a new Constitution on the basis of
adult suffrage, a longer term than four years is
desirable. New ministers require some time to
acquaint themselves with the details of administra-
tion, and their last year of office is usually taken up
in preparing for the next general election. With a
four-year term they will not have enough time for
any kind of planned administration.
Articles 107
and 200
10. Supreme Court and High Courts.—Follow-
ing the practice prevailing in the United Kingdom
and the United States of America, the Committee
has proposed that in certain circumstances retired
judges may be invited to serve in particular cases
both in the Supreme Court and in the High Courts.
Article 131. 11. Mode of selection of Governors.—Some
members of the Committee feel that the co-existence
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY, FEB. 26,1948 131
99THE DRAFT CONSTITUTION
PDF page 133
of a Governor elected by the people and a Chief
Minister responsible to the Legislature might lead
to friction. The Committee has therefore suggested
an alternative mode of appointing Governors: the
Legislature should elect a panel of four persons
(who need not be residents of the State) and the Pre-
sident of the Union should appoint one of the four
as Governor.
Article 138. 12. Deputy Governors.—The Committee has not
thought it necessary to make any provision for
Deputy Governors, because a Deputy Governor will
have no function to perform so long as the Governor
is there. At the Centre, the position is different,
because the Vice-President is also the ex-officio
Chairman of the Council of States; but in most of
the States there will be no Upper House and it will
not be possible to give the Deputy Governor func-
tions similar to those of the Vice-President. There
is a provision in the Draft enabling the Legislature
of the State (or the President) to make necessary
arrangements for the discharge of the functions of
the Governor in any unforeseen contingency.
Articles 212
to 214.
13. Centrally administered areas.—In accord-
ance with a resolution of the Constituent Assembly,
you, as the President, appointed a Committee of
seven members for the purpose of recommending con-
stitutional changes in the centrally administered areas
namely, Delhi, Ajiner-Merwara, Coorg, Panth
Piploda and the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. The
Committee submitted its report on October 21, 1948.
The Committee’s recommendations were briefly
these:—
(1) Each of the provinces of Delhi, Ajmer-
Merwara and Coorg should have a
Lieutenant-Governor appointed by the
President of India.
(2) Each of these provinces should normally
be administered by a Council of minis-
ters responsible to the Legislature.
(3) Each of these provinces should have an
elected Legislature.
As regards Panth Piploda the Committee recom-
mended that it should be added to Ajmer-Merwara
and as regards the Andaman and Nicobar Islands
132 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY, FEB. 26,1948
100 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
PDF page 134
the Committee recommended that they should con-
tinue to be administered by the Government of
India as at present, with such adjustments as might
be deemed necessary: in other words, these Islands
were to continue as a Chief Commissioner’s pro-
vince. The member representing Ajmer-Merwara
and the member representing Coorg on this Com-
mittee appended a note to the Committee’s re-
port, in which they said that the special problems
arising out of the smallness, geographical position
and scantiness of resources of these areas might at no
distant future necessitate the joining of each of
these areas to a contiguous unit. They therefore
urged that there should be a specific provision in the
Constitution to make this possible after ascertaining
the wishes of the people concerned.
So far as Delhi is concerned, it seems to the Com-
mittee that as the capital of India it can hardly be
placed under a local administration. In the United
States, Congress exercises exclusive legislative power
in respect of the seat of the Government; so too in
Australia. The Drafting Committee has, therefore,
come to the conclusion that a more comprehensive
plan than that recommended by the ad hoc Committee
is desirable. Accordingly, the Drafting Committee
has proposed that these central areas may be admi-
nistered by the Government of India either
through a Chief Commissioner or a Lieutenant-
Governor or through the Governor or the Ruler of a
neighbouring State. What is to be done in the case
of a particular area is left to the President to pres-
cribe by order; he will, of course, in this, as in other
matters, act on the advice of responsible ministers.
He may, if so advised, have a Lieutenant-Governor
in Delhi; he may, again, if so advised, administer
Coorg either through the Governor of Madras or
through the Ruler of Mysore after ascertaining the
wishes of the people of Coorg. He may also by order
create a local Legislature or a Council of advisers
with such constitution, powers and functions,
in each case, as may be specified in the order.
This seems to the Drafting Committee to be a flexible
plan which can be adjusted to the diverse require-
ments of the areas concerned.
The Committee has also provided that Indian
States (such as those of the Orissa group) which
have ceded full and exclusive authority, jurisdicTHE GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY, FEB. 26,1948 133
101THE DRAFT CONSTITUTION
PDF page 135
tion and powers to the Central Government may be
administered exactly as if they were Centrally Ad-
ministered Areas, i.e., through a Chief Commis-
sioner, or Lieutenant-Governor, or through the
Governor or the Ruler of a neighbouring State,
according to the requirements of each case.
Articles 216
to 232.
14. Distribution of Legislative Powers.—For the
most part, the Drafting Committee has made no
change in the Legislative Lists as recommended by
the Union Powers Committee and adopted by the
Constituent Assembly, but I would draw attention to
three matters in respect of which the Drafting Com-
mittee has made changes:
(a) The Committee has provided in effect that
when a subject, which is normally in the
State List, assumes national importance,
then the Union Parliament may legislate
upon it. To prevent any unwarranted
encroachment upon State powers, it has
been provided in the Draft that this can
be done only if the Council of States,
which may be said to represent the States
as Units, passes a resolution to that effect
by a two-thirds majority.
(b) The Committee has considered it desirable to
put into the Concurrent List the whole
subject of succession, instead of only
succession to property other than agricul-
tural land. Similarly, the Committee has
put into the Concurrent List all the
matters in respect of which parties are
now governed by their personal law. This
will facilitate the enactment of a uniform
law for India in these matters.
(c) While putting land acquisition for the pur
poses of the Union into the Union List
and land acquisition for the purposes of
a State into the State List, the Committee
has provided that the principles on-which
compensation for acquisition is to be
determined shall in all cases be in the
Concurrent List, in order that there may
be some uniformity in this matter.
134 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY, FEB. 26,1948
102 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES