Vol. 13 · pages 981–985
The Principal Architect of the Constitution of India
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 981 (printed page 948)
948 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
The other paragraph which has undergone an important change
is paragraph 5. Paragraph 5 deals with the applicability of the laws
made by Parliament and by the local Legislature to the scheduled
areas. Paragraph 5, as it originally stood, required that if the Tribes
Advisory Council directed that the law made by Parliament or made
by the local Legislature should be made applicable to the scheduled
areas in a modified form, then the Governor was bound to carry out
the order or the decision of the Tribes Advisory Council. It was felt
that it would be much better to let the Governor have the discretion
in the matter of the application of the laws made by Parliament or
by the local Legislature to the scheduled areas and that his discretion
should not be controlled absolutely, as it was proposed to be done by
the original provision contained in paragraph 5.
The other important thing to which I should like to call the attention
of honourable Members is to paragraph 6. Paragraph 6, as originally
drafted, set out a scheduled of what are to be scheduled areas. This
provision has become necessary particularly because it is not possible
at this stage to know what are going to be the scheduled areas in
States in Part III. It is felt that both for meeting the difficulty to
which I have referred as well as to make the provisions elastic, it
would be much better to leave the power with the President rather
than to have a definite part dealing with the scheduled areas.
Another important amendment to which I should like to draw
attention is paragraph 7 which is included in Part IV and which
deals with the Amendment of the Fifth Schedule. Originally, as the
paragraph stood, there was no provision for the amendment of the Fifth
Schedule. It is now provided that Parliament may amend this Schedule
and I think it is desirable that Parliament should have the power to
amend this Schedule. It is no use of creating a sort of a State within
a State and it is not desirable that this kind of special provision under
which certain tribes would be excluded from the general operation of
the law made by the legislature as well as Parliament and the provision
contained in sub-paragraph (2) of paragraph 5, where, so to say, ‘the
Governor is constituted a law-making body for making regulations of
certain character which are mentioned in (a), (b) and (c) and which are
to have over-riding powers in so far as they relate to these matters
over any law made by Parliament or by the legislature, should not
be sterotyped for all times and that it should be open to Parliament
to make such changes as time and circumstances may require.
Consequently, it has been provided in the new Paragraph 7 of Part
PDF page 982 (printed page 949)
949DRAFT CONSTITUTION
IV that Parliament shall have such power to make such amendments
as it finds necessary and any such amendment of the Schedule shall
not be deemed to be an amendment of the Constitution, but shall be
made by the ordinary process of law.
I may mention that the Drafting Committee in putting forth this
new Schedule had discussed the matter with the representatives of
the provinces who are concerned with this particular matter, namely
of scheduled areas and scheduled tribes. We had also taken into
consideration the opinion of my honourable Friend, Mr. Thakkar,
who knows a great deal about this matter and I may say without
contradiction that this new schedule has the approval of all the parties
who are concerned in this matter, and I hope that the House will have
no difficulty in accepting the new Schedule in place of the old one.
*****
*Mr. President : So far as I can see, there is no other amendment
to the Fifth Schedule as now proposed.
Prof. Shibban Lal Saksena : I have some amendments.
Mr. President : Coming at the last moment, these amendments
have not been circulated to Members. They came in at 8.58 this
morning.
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : I have no idea about
them. These should not be allowed.
Mr. President : If you have any amendments, you may make
your observations. I may tell the House that I have a set of new
amendments sent in by Prof. Shibban Lal Saksena and Dr. Deshmukh.
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : We have no copies. We
do not know what they are talking about.
Mr. President : Dr. Deshmukh’s amendment came in at 9.20 in the
morning. Prof. Saksena’s came in at 8.58 in the morning. Technically
you are just before the commencement of the session but I think it
is very inconvenient to the other Members.
Dr. P. S. Deshmukh (C. P. & Berar: General) : My amendments
are of a drafting nature.
Mr. President : Very well, they will be handed over to the Drafting
Committee. I do not think there is any substance in any of your
amendments, Prof. Saksena ?
*****
*CAD, Vol. IX, 5th September 1949, pp. 978-979.
PDF page 983 (printed page 950)
950 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
*Mr. President : I wish to close the discussion now. Does Dr. Ambedkar
wish to say anything?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : Mr. Munshi has said everything
that was needed to be said and I do not think I can usefully add anything.
Mr. President : Then I shall put the amendments to vote now.
Mr. Naziruddin Ahmad : My amendments need not be put to vote, but
they could be considered by the Drafting Committee.
*****
Paragraph 3 was added to the Fifth Schedule.
SIXTH SCHEDULE
†Mr. President : We now go to the Sixth Schedule.
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : Sir, I move :
“That in sub-paragraph (1) of paragraph 1, before the words, ‘The tribal areas’
the words ‘Subject to the provisions of this paragraph’ be inserted.”
Originally, the draft merely said that the Tribal areas were those which
were included in the table attached to this Schedule. There was no power
given to define the boundaries of those areas included in the Table. It is felt
that it is necessary to give the Governor the power to define the boundaries
of those areas, included in the Table. In order to provide for this power for
the Governor, it is necessary to add the words which are contained in this
amendment.
Mr. President : Amendment number 99 also relates to paragraph 1.
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : May I move that?
Mr. President : Yes.
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : Sir, I move :
“That for sub-paragraph (3) of paragraph 1, the following sub-paragraph be
substituted :—
‘(3) The Governor may, by public notification—
(a) include any area in Part I of the said Table,
(b) create a new autonomous district,
(c) increase the area of any autonomous district,
(d) diminish the area of any autonomous district,
(e) unite two or more autonomous districts or parts thereof so as to form
one autonomous district,
(f) define the boundaries of any autonomous district:
Provided that no order shall be made by the Governor under clauses (b), (c), (d)
and (e) of this sub-paragraph except after consideration of the report of a Commission appointed under sub-paragraph (1) of paragraph 14 of this Schedule.’ ”
*CAD, Vol. IX, 3rd September 1949, p. 999.
†Ibid., pp. 1001-1002.
PDF page 984 (printed page 951)
951DRAFT CONSTITUTION
In this amendment, the new things to which attention must be
drawn are included in sub-clauses (e) and (f) of sub-paragraph (3).
As necessary because it may be required, in any particular state of
affairs, that two or more autonomous districts may be united together.
The power contained in sub-clause (f) is also necessary because it may
be desirable to define the boundaries in case there is any particular
dispute between the different tribes.
The proviso introduces a change. By comparing the proviso with
the original provisos, it will be seen that there were to provisos to
subparagraph (3). In the first proviso, the Governor could act under
clause (b) or clause (c) on the recommendation of a Commission. But,
if he wanted to act under clauses (d) or (e) he was required to have
a resolution of the District Councils of the Autonomous Districts
concerned. It is felt that this distinction made by the two provisos
for the different parts of sub-paragraph (3) is not necessary. It is
better to make it uniform by requiring the Governor to act after
consideration of the report of a Commission which is proposed to be
appointed under sub-paragraph (1) of paragraph 14 of this Schedule.
Mr. President : As regards this Schedule, as the Schedule as
a whole has not been changed but only certain amendments to
some of the paragraphs have been suggested, I propose to take this
paragraph by paragraph. Regarding the first para, these are the
two amendments which have been moved on behalf of the Drafting
Committee. I will now take the other amendments of which notice
has been given. There are some printed in the second volume of the
list of amendments.
(Amendments 3489, 3490 and 3491 were not moved)
There is one amendment that paragraph 1 to 16 be deleted. I do
not know whether to take it.
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : That need not be taken.
*Mr. President : ...Dr. Ambedkar, would you like to say anything?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : Sir, there are just two points
which have been raised in the course of the remarks made on these
amendments which call for reply. The first question is the one, which
was raised by Mr. Chaliha. I must say I was somewhat surprised at
the amendment tabled by Mr. Chaliha, because like the Fifth Schedule
the Sixth Schedule also has arisen, so to say, out of an agreement
between the Drafting Committee and the Premier of Assam, my Friend,
*CAD, Vol. IX, 5th September 1949, pp. 1004-1005.
PDF page 985 (printed page 952)
952 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
Mr. Nichols Roy and at which conference Mr. Chaliha also was
present, and he accepted the new schedule as amended by the Drafting
Committee. However, it cannot take long to dispel the doubt he has
in his mind as to who would constitute this Commission, who would
be its members, and all matters relating to the Commission. I think if
Mr. Chaliha had only read carefully the wroding of the Sixth Schedule
he would have seen that in appointing the Commission the Governor
is not going to act in his discretion. There is no discretion left in
the Governor. That being so, it is quite obvious that in consulting
the Commission, and defining its terms of reference, the Governor
would be guided by the advice of the local ministers, and I do not
think, therefore, there need be any fears such as the one that he
has expressed.
Now, with regard to the amendment of my Friend, Mr. Brajeshwar
Prasad, this is the one amendment I think in which so far as I am
concerned, I feel that he has urged some serious argument. He says
that the whole of the tribal area should be lifted from the Province
of Assam and should be made a Centrally administered area, because
there cannot be any other effect of the amendment which he has put
forward except the one which I have suggested. It means practically
constituting the area as a Centrally administered area. But he seems
to have forgotten two things. The first is this. Although we have
constituted autonomous districts for the purpose of the satisfaction of
the tribal people living in those areas that they will have, at any rate
for the first ten years, autonomy in the matter of the government of
their areas, we have now here provided that the autonomous districts
shall not constitute part of the province of Assam. That being so, it
is very difficult to leave part of the province to be governed by the
Governor of the province and part of the province to be administered
as a Centrally administered area.
The second point he has forgotten is this. He has forgotten to take
note : of the fact that even in constituting the autonomous areas, the
Drafting Committee has not forgotten that there are what are called
certain “frontier areas”, bordering on the autonomous districts. It
has been provided in this Schedule that so far as the administration
of these frontier areas of Assam is concerned, the Governor would
be acting under the President. Consequently whatever strategic
importance, the frontier areas may have, the Centre would certainly
have ample jurisdiction to see that none of the disturbing factors to
which he has made reference will find any place there. I therefore,
think that all these amendments are unnecessary and out of place.