Vol. 15 · pages 136–140
As Free India's First Law Minister and Member of Opposition in Parliament, 1947–1956
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 136 (printed page 119)
119PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES
Shri Hossain Imam : I was only suggesting. This
Ordinance can last until six weeks ............
Dr. Ambedkar : From the commencement of Parliament.
Shri Kamath (Madhya Pradesh): Six weeks after the
commencement of the next session of Parliament.
Dr. Ambedkar : We do not know what will happen. I
cannot say when Parliament will be called. We do not want
to be left in the lurch after having made an Ordinance.
Shri Kamath : How can that be ?
Dr. Ambedkar : This suggestion is a very impracticable
suggestion.
Besides, so far as this aspect is concerned, as I have said,
we have got a precedent. We have got a similar law with
regard to Delhi. We have got a similar law with regard to
Ajmer-Merwara, the Ajmer-Merwara Extension Act of 1947.
If these two Acts are not so bad as my friend tries to depict
them, I cannot understand why there should be any objection
to this measure. It may be, if there was time, I could suggest
to the House that at a later stage the House may consider the
procedure which has been recently adopted in the House of
Commons which consists of having a Standing Committee of
the House to examine such delegated legislation and to bring
to the notice of Parliament whether the delegated legislation
has either exceeded the original intention of Parliament or has
departed from it or has affected any fundamental prinicple.
This is a matter which we may take up independently. I
cannot understand how now after long practice, anybody can
object to what is called delegated legislation.
Mr. Deputy Speaker : The question is :
“That the Bill to provide for the extension of laws to certain
Part C States, be taken into consideration.”
The motion was adopted.
Shri Hossain Imam : May I ask the Hon. Minister to
explain why—he has not explained in the Statement of Objects
and Reasons—the age of consent has been reduced ?
PDF page 137 (printed page 120)
120 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
Mr. Deputy Speaker : He has already stated.
Dr. Ambedkar : The changes with regard to Manipur
have been made as a result of a conference which was held
between the representatives of the Home Department and
the Chief Commissioner in Manipur. It was he who suggested
that these changes must be made if the Central legislation
is to be extended.
Mr. Deputy Speaker : It is a little premature to apply
this section to these areas.
Shri Hossain Imam : The age of consent has been reduced.
Mr. Deputy Speaker : Possibly it goes back to the age
of consent under the old law, and all these reforms are not
sought to be extended to that area.
Clauses 1 to 4 were added to the Bill.
The Schedule was added to the Bill.
The Title and the Enacting Fromula were added to the Bill.
Dr. Ambedkar : I beg to move:
“That the Bill, be passed.”
Mr. Deputy Speaker : Motion moved.
“That the Bill be passed.”
Prof. Ranga (Madras): I am glad that the Hon. Minister
has given us this information that in Parliament they have
thought of the device of establishing a Standing Committee
to study these things as and when they come up before them
and advise Parliament, as a sort of a watchdog on behalf of
Parliament. Unfortunately, the Hon. Minister has not given
us any assurance that similar efforts would be made in this
House. I do request him to take steps at the earliest possible
opportunity to see that this Standing Committee does come
to be established by our Government.
Dr Ambedkar : I will bear that in mind.
Mr. Deputy Speaker : The question is:
“That the Bill be passed”
PDF page 138 (printed page 121)
121PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES
The motion was adopted.
The House then adjourned till a Quarter to Eleven of the
Clock on Wednesday, the 12th April, 1950.
REPEALING AND AMENDING BILL
*The Minister of Law (Dr. Ambedkar): Sir, may I
have your permission to take my Bill out of turn ? They
are very small ones.
Mr. Deputy Speaker : Yes.
Dr. Ambedkar : I beg to move :
“That the Bill to repeal certain amendments and to amend
certain other enactments, be taken into consideration.”
The purpose of the Bill which is brought in annually for
the purpose of pruning the Statute-book of what is called
the “dead wood” and of amending and making good certain
errors discovered in certain enactments. I do not think it
necessary for me to say anything more in support of the
motion I make.
Mr. Deputy Speaker : Motion moved:
“That the Bill to repeal certain enactments and to
amendments and to amend certain other enactments, be taken
into consideration.”
Shri Himatsingka (West Bengal) : What I would suggest
to the Hon. Minister of Law is this. Would he please take
steps to have all the laws that are in force printed in a book
form so that one may follow what laws are in existence and
what not? At present it is so very difficult. We are passing
so many laws in a day that it is very difficult for anyone
to know or find out what the law is. Therefore, will he take
my suggestion into consideration and have the laws in force
up to 1949 printed ?
Dr. Ambedkar : That is being done.
*P. D., Vol. 4, Part II, 11th April 1950, p. 2776.
PDF page 139 (printed page 122)
122 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
Mr. Deputy Speaker : The question is:
“That the Bill to repeal certain enactments and to amend
certain other enactments, be taken into consideration.”
The motion was adopted.
Clauses 1 to 4 were aded to the Bill.
The First and Second Schedules were added to the Bill.
The Title and the Enacting Formula were added to the Bill
Dr. Ambedkar : I beg to move:
“That the Bill be passed”
Mr. Deputy Speaker : The question is:
“That the Bill be passed.”
The motion was adopted.
PDF page 140 (printed page 123)
123PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES
(16)
REPRESENTATION OF THE PEOPLE BILL
[ MR. SPEAKER in the Chair ]
*The Minister of Law (Dr. Ambedkar): May I, Sir, with
your permission make the motion that stands in my name
in the Order Paper for today ? I could not do it this morning
because printed copies of the Bill were not available in the
morning. As the House takes objection to giving leave for
introduction without copies of the Bill being there, I thought
I should wait.
Mr. Speaker : Yes ; he may make that motion. I was
told that the matter was not to be taken up. That is why I
passed over that.
Dr. Ambedkar : Because, I said that printed copies were
not available.
I beg to move for leave to introduce a Bill to provide for
the allocation of seats in, and the delimitation of constituencies
for the purpose of election to, the House of the People and
the Legislatures of States, the qualification of voters at
such elections, the preparation of electoral rolls and matters
connected therewith.
Mr. Speaker : The question is :
“That leave be granted to introduce a Bill to provide for the
allocation of seats in, and the delimination of constituencies
for the purpose of elections to, the House of the People and
the Legislatures of States, the qualification of voters at such
elections, the preparation of electoral rolls, and matters connected
therewith.”
The motion was adopted.
Dr. Ambedkar : I introduce the Bill.
*P. D., Vol. 4, Part II, 12th April 1950, pp. 2797-98.