Vol. 15 · pages 141–145
As Free India's First Law Minister and Member of Opposition in Parliament, 1947–1956
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 141 (printed page 124)
124 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
REPRESENTATION OF THE PEOPLE BILL —contd.
*The Minister of State for Transport and Railways
(Shri Santhanam): I beg to move:
“That the Bill to provide for the allocation of seats in, and
the delimitation of constituencies for the purpose of elections
to, the House of the People and the Legislatures of States, the
qualifications of voters at such elections, the preparation of
electoral rolls, and matters connected therewith, be taken into
consideration.”
I do not propose to speak at this stage. By the end of the
discussion I expect the Minister in charge will be present and
he will then reply. If he is not present then I shall reply to
the debate.
Mr. Deputy Speaker : Motion moved.
Shri Bharati (Madras): This is a very important Bill
and may I suggest that it would help the discussion to a
very great extent if the Hon. Minister in charge of the Bill
elucidated certain points which are very necessary, so that
we may not traverse unnecessary ground. The Hon. Minister,
Dr. Ambedkar, has just come to the House. It was only
because he was not here that Hon. Mr. Santhanam made
the formal motion. If Dr. Ambedkar had been here he would
certainly have made a very useful speech. I am prepared to
speak after the Hon. Dr. Ambedkar has sopken. However, I
leave it to the House.
The Minister of Law (Dr. Ambedkar): Sir, at the outset
I must apologise to the House for my delay in reaching the
House. I was told that the Insurance Bill would not be finished
before 4-30 p.m. and that a message would be sent to me in
my room ...........................
Shri Kamath (Madhya Pradesh) : There are always
surprises in life.
Dr. Ambedkar : With regard to this Bill it is obvious
that the Bill deals with four questions. Firstly, it deals with
the allocation of seats for the House of the People among the
different States. Secondly, it deals with the fixing of the total
seats for the State Legislative Assembly. Thirdly, it deals with
*P.D., Vol. 4, Part II, 18th April 1950, pp. 3000-6.
PDF page 142 (printed page 125)
125PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES
the questions relating to the registration of voters for election
to Parliament and election to State Assemblies. And fourthly,
the Bill proposes to fix the composition of the State Legislative
Councils and the registration of voters for the Councils. I
propose to take each of these points and explain to the House
what exactly the Bill does.
First I propose to explain to the House the question of
the allocation of Parliamentary seats among the States. The
allocation proposed by the Bill is shown in the First Schedule.
The House will recall that the Constitution lays down in
article 81 the rules which have to be observed in the matter
of distributing seats in Parliament among the different States.
The rules to which I made reference are laid down in article
81(1)(b) and 81(1)(c). The first rule which this article lays down
is that the constituency shall be so determined that there
shall be not less than one member for every 750,000 and not
more than one for every 500,000 of the population. The second
rule which this article lays down is that whatever standard
figure is chosen between these two figures—the maximum
and minimum—that standard figure, so far as the States in
Parts A and B are concerned, shall be uniform throughout
the territory of India. That is the general direction given by
the Constitution which this Bill is bound to conform to.
The standard figure adopted in this Bill for the purpose
of allocating seats is one Member for every 720,000. It will
be seen that this figure is in between 750,000 and 500,000.
The seats for the different States are arrived at by dividing
the total population of each State by this standard figure of
720,000 and you get the total number of seats for each State
set out in the First Schedule to this Bill. The total population
is as estimated on the 1st March 1950 according to the order
issued by the President under the appropriate article of the
Constitution. I believe it is article 347 ...........
Shri Bharati : Article 387.
Dr. Ambedkar : I believe hon. Members have got the
notification issued by the President in which the population
of the various States as estimated has been shown ...........
PDF page 143 (printed page 126)
126 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
Shri Bharati : We have not a copy of it. When was it
issued ?
Dr. Ambedkar : It was issued on the 17th April 1950.
Shri Bharati : That was yesterday. We have not been
supplied with a copy.
Dr. Ambedkar : I am very sorry. It is in the Gazette.
We are in such a great hurry that long intervals are not
permissible.
Dr. Deshmukh (Madhya Pradesh): Sir, the figures of
population are essential for the Debate.
Dr. Ambedkar : I think they will be circulated. However,
I shall read them out.
Part A States
Assam ... ... 8.51 million
Bihar ... ... 39.42 ”
Bombay ... ... 32.68 ”
Madhya Pradesh ... ... 20.92 ”
Madras ... ... 54.29 ”
Orissa ... ... 14.41 ”
Punjab ... ... 12.61 ”
U.P. ... ... 61.62 ”
West Bengal ... ... 24.32 ”
I do not think I need trouble the House with the population
figures for States in Part B and Part C.
Shri Raj Bahadur (Rajasthan): We want them.
Dr. Ambedkar : Then I will read them out.
Part B States
Hyderabad ... ... 17.69 million
Jammu and Kashmir ... ... 4.37 ”
Madhya Bharat ... ... 7.87 ”
Mysore ... ... 8.06 ”
Patiala and East Punjab States Union 3.32 ”
Rajasthan ... ... 14.69 ”
Saurashtra ... ... 3.96 ”
Travancore-Cochin ... 8.58 ”
PDF page 144 (printed page 127)
127PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES
Part C States
Ajmer ... ... 0.73 million
Bhopal ... ... 0.85 ”
Bilaspur ... ... 0.13 ”
Coorg ... ... 0.17 ”
Delhi ... ... 1.51 ”
Himachal Pradesh ... 1.08 ”
Cutch ... ... 0.55 ”
Manipur ... ... 0.54 ”
Tripura ... ... 0.58 ”
Vindhya Pradesh ... 3.88 ”
That is the population as calculated on the 1st March 1950.
Shri Kamath : What about the Andaman and Nicobar
Islands ?
Dr. Ambedkar : I have not got the figures here, and they
do not form part of this scheme.
Shri Bharati : Is any Member given to Aandamans in
the Schedule ?
Dr. Ambedkar : Yes, but that is a separate thing
altogether. I am coming to that.
I have given to the House the total population of the States
in Part A, Part B and also in Part C.
Dr. Tek Chand (Punjab): Are these based on the census
of 1941?
Dr. Ambedkar : They have been calculated for the purpose
of this Schedule by the Census Commissioner who must be
taken to be the final authority in this matter ; he has advised
the Election Commissioner that these should be the standard
figures that may be taken as the basis.
Dr. Tek Chand : How have they been calculated ?
Dr. Ambedkar : It is a very difficult thing to say now.
They have been calculated in the manner prescribed in the
Constitution (Determination of Population) Order, 1950, and
the President has accepted them.
PDF page 145 (printed page 128)
128 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
As I said, the First Schedule refers to the House of the
People. The seats for the States in Part A and Part B have
been calculated on the basis of one Member for every 720,000
of the population. With regard to Part C, hon. Members will
remember that the determination of the seats for States in
Part C is set out in article 82. That article 82 practically
leaves it to Parliament to decide it in the best manner it
can without being bound by the two rules which have been
laid down in article 81. Consequently, really speaking, this
standard figure of 720,000 could not be made the basis for
the allocation of seats to States in Part C because on that
basis most of those States will not even get a single seat in
Parliament. Consequently, what has been done is that they
have been just given one seat for the purpose of securing their
representation in Parliament without being bound down by
any of the rules that have been laid down for States in Part
A and Part B.
Shri Syamnandan Sahaya (Bihar): But in cases where
there is more than one seat ?
Dr. Ambedkar: I am coming to that. With regard to
Delhi an exception has been made, namely, that Delhi has
been given three seats.
Shri Raj Bahadur: Why was this exception made ?
Shri Bharati: Because it is the Capital.
Dr. Ambedkar : One of the reasons is that Delhi has
quite a big population as compared to the other States listed
in Part C. The basis we have taken with regard Delhi is one
seat for every 500,000 of the population, and therefore Delhi
will have three seats.
Capt. A. P. Singh (Vindhya Pradesh): Why has this
standard of 500,000 not been taken as a basis in the case
of Vindhya Pradesh ? Vindhya Pradesh has been given only
five seats.
Dr. Ambedkar: Vindhya Pradesh has a big population.
What I say is this, that we are trying to upgrade where
upgradation is necessary ; we are not trying to upgrade where