Vol. 15 · pages 806–810
As Free India's First Law Minister and Member of Opposition in Parliament, 1947–1956
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 806 (printed page 787)
787PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES
Corporations Bill, but because I was engaged on another
Committee I could not be present in the House and I took
your permission for that. I have since understood that those
amendments were not allowed to be moved which you were
pleased to tell me would be allowed. So, it is happening like
this—Members of the Select Committee are not to blame.
Dr. Ambedkar: I am not blaming.
Pandit Thakur Das Bhargava: I would rather, under
these circumstances, beg of Dr. Ambedkar to kindly give up
this Bill. This Bill is not important—it does not require......
Dr. Ambedkar: I am prepared to give every Bill that is
standing in my name.
Pandit Thakur Das Bhargava: I would suggest that
this Bill be dropped.
*Mr. Deputy Speaker: So far as the Select Committee
on the Notaries Bill is concerned, due to causes beyond their
control hon. Members could not be present. They had to attend
various, other Select Committees and the meetings could not
be held for want of quorum. I would request the Hon. Minister
to make another effort in this direction.
Dr. Ambedkar: I am in the hands of the House.
Dr. Tek Chand (Punjab): May I suggest that the time
for submitting the report of this Select Committee may be
extended up to the 6th ? The time expires today.
Mr. Deputy Speaker: I shall take notice of the oral
motion. Is it the pleasure of the House to extend the time ?
Dr. Tek Chand : We shall meet on the 4th or 5th and
by this time the other Select Committees will have finished
their work. This is only half an hour’s work. Therefore, I am
making the suggestion for extension of time.
Mr. Deputy Speaker: Does the Hon. Minister agree with
the proposal for extension of time ?
*P. D., Vol. 14, Part II, 28th September 1951, pp. 3619-21.
PDF page 807 (printed page 788)
788 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
Dr. Ambedkar : I have no objection.
Mr. Deputy Speaker: I thought the Hon. Minister who
is the sponsor of the Bill will make the motion.
Dr. Ambedkar : That is a difficult matter for me at
this stage. If the House appoints a Select Committee, surely
Government will take the necessary steps to put the measure
through.
Mr. Deputy Speaker: Considering the peculiar
circumstances of this House, the House does not seem to be
in favour of discharging the Select Committee and an oral
motion has been made for extension of time by one of the
hon. Members. I would like this motion to be made by the
Hon. Minister himself.
Dr. Ambedkar : I do not know whether I can do that. It
is not for me to make any motion.
Mr. Deputy Speaker: He is the sponsor of the Bill.
Therefore, he has to make the motion. Just a minute. The
time does not expire today. The Select Committee can report
up to the 1st. Therefore, in due course the Hon. Minister may
make a motion for extending the time up to the 6th. He is
now aware that the house is generally in favour of continuing
the Select Committee. That disposes of this particular matter.
So far as other matters are concerned. I would ask hon.
Members to refer to rule 7o. It is true that hon. Members
are on various Select Committees, and with sessions in the
morning and evening the Select Committees will have to
sit while the House is in session. Rule 70 says that Select
Committees may sit whilst the House is sitting, provided that
on a division bell being rung the Chairman of the Committee
shall suspend the proceedings of the Committee for such time
as will in his opinion enable Members to vote on the division.
I understand this is the practice in the House of Commons
also. Hon. Members want many matters to be referred to
Select Committees. On one hand there is this desire and
on the other there is a desire to say ‘ We are called in the
Select Committee’. My remarks yesterday did not apply to
PDF page 808 (printed page 789)
789PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES
hon. Members who were away in connection with Select
Committees. Select Committee work is as good as work in
this Parliament. As far as Shri Sidhva is concerned, he need
not complain that Government have put him in several Select
Committees. Why should he be anxious to serve on more than
one Select Committee ?
Shri Sidhva : We did not approach for Select Committee
membership.
Dr. Ambedkar: The work of the Select Committes and
the house will be faciliated if care is taken, while nominating
people to Select Committees, to see that the same people are
not nominated to two Committees.
Shri Sidhva: Quite right.
Mr. Deputy Speaker: In future, care should be taken to
see that Members are spread over various Select Committees
instead of clogging or requesting one Member to be on more
than one Select Committee. Even if a mistake is committed
by the sponsor of a Bill in putting the same Member again,
the Member concerned might consider whether it is proper for
him to accept membership of more than one Select Committee
and not complain to the House that he has no time to attend
meetings.
PDF page 809 (printed page 790)
790 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
(41)
*MOTIONS RE : DELIMITATION OF
CONSTITUENCIES ORDERS
Mr. Deputy Speaker: We will take up motions redelimitation of constituencies. I will call the names of hon.
Members who have given notice of motions, they need merely
say they move.
The Minister of Law (Dr. Ambedkar): I have got to
make five motions which are the main motions. Thereafter,
there are certain motions for amending my motions. Therefore,
I submit, subject to your ruling, the proper course would be
to call upon me first to move my motions and then ask the
other Members who want to move amending motions to move
theirs.
Mr. Deputy Speaker: The Hon. Minister may move his
motions now.
COUNCIL CONSTITUENCIES (BOMBAY) ORDER
Dr. Ambedkar: I beg to move:
That the following modifications be made in the Delimitation
of Council Constituencies (Bombay) Order, 1951, laid on the
Table on the 20th September 1951, namely;—
(1) That in the Table, under the heading “Graduates’
Constituencies” against the entry “Bombay City (Graduates)” in
column 1, for the entry “Bombay City” occurring in column 2,
the following be substituted, namely:—
“Greater Bombay.”
(2) That in the Table, under the heading “Graduates’
Constituencies” against the entry “Northern Division (Graduates)”
in column 1, for the entry “Northern Division” occurring in column
2, the following be substituted, namely:—
“Northern Division excluding Bombay Suburban Districts
and Ahmedabad City.”
*P. D., Vol. 16, Part II, 6th October 1951, pp. 4399-4404.
PDF page 810 (printed page 791)
791PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES
(3) That in the Table, under the heading “Graduates’
Constituencies” against the entry “Central Division (Graduates)”
in column 1, for the entry “Central Division” occurring in column
2, the following be substituted, namely:—
“Central Division excluding Poona City.”
(4) That in the Table, under the heading “Teachers’
Constituencies” against the entry “Bombay City (Teachers)” in
column 1, for the entry “Bombay City” occurring in column 2,
the following be substituted, namely:—
“Greater Bombay.”
(5) That in the Table, under the heading “Teachers’
Constituencies” against the entry “Northern Division (Teachers)”
in column 1, for the entry “Northern Division” occurring in column
2, the following be substituted, namely:—
“Northern Division excluding Bombay suburban Districts and
Ahmedabad City.”
(6) That in the Table, under the heading “Teachers’
Constituencies” against the entry “Central Division (Teachers’)”
in column 1, for the entry “Central Division” occurring in column
2, the following be substituted, namely:—
“Central Division excluding Poona City”.
(7) That in the Table, under the heading “Local Authorities’
Constituencies”, against the entry “Bombay City (Local
Authorities)” in column 1, for the entry “Municipal Corporation of
Bombay City” occurring in column 2, the following be substituted,
namely:—
“Area under the jurisdiction of the Municipal Corporation
of Greater Bombay.”
(8) That in the Table, under the heading “Local Authorities’
Constituencies”, against the entry “Ahmedabad City (Local
Authorities)” in column 1, for the entry “Municipal Corporation of
Ahmedabad” occurring in column 2, the following be substituted,
namely:—
“Area under the jursdiction of the Municipal Corporation of
Ahmedabad.”
(9) That in the Table, under the heading “Local authorities’
Constituencies” against the entry “Ahmedabad District (Local
Authorities)”, in column 1, for the entry “Ahmedabad District
(excluding Ahmedabad City Municipal Corporation) and
Sabarkantha District” occurring in column 2, the following be
substituted, namely:—
“Ahmedabad District (excluding the area under the jurisdiction
of the Municipal Corporation of Ahmedabad) and Sabarkantha
District.”