Vol. 15 · pages 811–815
As Free India's First Law Minister and Member of Opposition in Parliament, 1947–1956
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 811 (printed page 792)
792 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
(10) That in the Table, under the heading “Local Authorities’
Constituencies”, against the entry “Poona City (Local Authorities)” in
column 1, for the entry “Municipal Corporation of Poona City” occurring
in column 2, the following be substituted, namely:—
“Area under the jurisdiction of the Municipal Corpration of Poona.”
(11) That in the Table, under the heading “Local Authorities’
Constituencies”, against the entry “Poona (Local Authorities)”, in
column 1, for the entry “Poona District excluding Poona City Municipal
Corporation” occurring in column 2, the following be substituted,
namely:—
“Poona District (excluding the area under the jurisdiction of the
Municipal Corporation of Poona.”
COUNCIL CONSTITUENCIES (MADRAS) ORDER
Dr. Ambedkar: I beg to move :
That the following modifications be made in the Delimitation of
Council Constituencies (Madras) Order, 1951, laid on the Table on the
20th September 1951, namely:—
(1) That at page 1, in the Table, under the heading “Graduates’
Constituencies” against the entry “Madras South (Graduates)” in column
1, for the words “Madras City, and the Chingleput” occurring in column
2, the words “Madras, Chingleput” be substituted.
(2) That at page 2, in the Table, under the heading “Teachers’
Constituencies” against the entry “Madras South (Teachers)” in column
1, for the words “Madras City” and the Chingleput” occurring in column
2, the words “Madras, Chingleput” be substituted.
COUNCIL CONSTITUENCIES (MYSORE) ORDER
Dr. Ambedkar: I beg to move:
That the following modification be made in the Delimitation of
Council Constituencies (Mysore) Order, 1951, laid on the Table on the
20th September 1951, namely:—
That in the Table, the word “Revenue” wherever it occurs, be omitted.
PARLIAMENTARY AND ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCIES (MADRAS)
(AMENDMENT) ORDER
Dr. Ambedkar: I beg to move :
(1) That the following modification be made in the Delimitation
of Parliamentary and Assembly Constituencies (Madras) (Amendment)
Order 1951 laid on the Table on the 20th September 1951, namely:—
‘That at page 17, in Item (69)—“Villages comprising the firka of
Vaniyambadi in Tirupattur Taluk”—for the words “and Chinnakallupalli”
occurring at the end, the words “Chinnakallupalli and Devasthanam”
be substituted.’
PDF page 812 (printed page 793)
793PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES
(2) That the following modifications be made in the
Delimitation of Parliamentary and Assembly Constituencies
(Madras) (Amendment) Order, 1951 laid on the Table on the
20th September 1951, namely :—
1. That at page 1, in para 2 (b), in the proposed Explanation,
for the words “area comprising the villages” the word “areas” be
substituted.
2. That at page 2, for para 5 of the said Order the following
be substituted, namely :—
“5. in item (23) of the Appendix to the said Order, for the
words “Sevalur part, Pothuravuthampatti, Manapparai” the words
“Manapparai panchayat” shall be substituted.
3. That in para 6,—
(i) in item (2) of the Schedule, for the words “Pitali, Sirimamidi
and Gollagandi” the words “Pitali and Sirimamidi” be
substitued;
(ii) in item (14) of the Schedule, after the words “Venkampeta
near Ramavaram” the word “Ramavaram.” be inserted;
(iii) in item (21) of the Schedule, after the word “Derasan,” the
word “Pydibhimavaram” be inserted ;
(iv) in item (63) of the Schedule, after the words “Koppedu
Kapula, Kandriga,” the word “Agaram,” be inserted;
(v) in item (80) of the Schedule, for the word “Kallupatti”
where it occurs for the second time, the word “Sethupatti”
be substituted ;
(vi) in item (87) of the Schedule, for the word “Aruppukkottai”
the words “Aruppukkottai Municipality” be substituted ;
(vii) in item (93) of the Schedule, for the words and brackets
“Devakottai Rural (Eravaseri)” the words and brackets
“Devakottai Municipality, Eravaseri (Rural)” be substituted;
and
(viii) in item (95) of the Schedule, for the words and brackets
“Keppapatnam (Manamathurai Panchayat Board)” the words
“Kepparpatnam, Manamadurai Panchayat” be substituted.
PARLIAMENTARY AND ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCIES (UTTAR
PRADESXH) (AMENDMENT) ORDER
Dr. Ambedkar: I beg to move:
That the following modifications be made in the Delimitation
of Parliamentary and Assembly Constituencies (Uttar Pradesh)
(Amendment) Order, 1951 laid on the Table on the 20th September
1951, namely:—
(1) That at page 1, in para. 2 (ii), after the words “but
including Mohammadi,” the words “Atwa Piparia,” be inserted.
PDF page 813 (printed page 794)
794 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
(2) That at page 1, in para. 2 (iii), after the bracket and words
“excluding Mohammadi,” the words “Atwa Piparia,” be inserted.
(3) That at page 2, in para, 3 (i), in the Table for the entry
“Pauri (North) cum Chamoli (East)” in column 1, the following
entry be substituted, namely:—
“Pauri (South)- cum-Chamoli (East)”
(4) That at page 2, after para. 3 (iii), the following new
sub-para. be inserted, namely :—
“(iiia) for the entries “ Mohammadi (West) and Mohammadi
(East)” in column 1, and for the entries against them in column
2, the following entries be substituted, namely:—
12
Mohammadi (West) ... Moh ammadi, Atwa Piparia, Magadpur and
Pasgawan Parganas of Mohammadi tahsil.
Mohammadi (East) ... Moham madi tahsil (excluding Mohammadi,
Atwa Piparia, Magadpur and Pasgawan
Parganas).”
*Mr. Deputy Speaker : I shall take up Bihar first. Have
they come to any arrangement ?
BIHAR ORDER
Dr. Ambedkar (Bombay): I had a meeting with several
Members who have tabled amendment motions to my main
motion with regard to the Constituencies Orders issued by the
President. The arrangement arrived at is this. Out of list 4, I
accept amendment No. 6, parts 1 and 2 (amendment moved
by Shaikh Mohiuddin and Mr. Kshudiram Mahata).
Mr. Deputy Speaker: I understand there are only two
parts. The Hon. Minister is accepting both the parts ?
Dr. Ambedkar: Anyhow, I would like to particularise the
parts ; I accept parts 1 and 2.
Mr. Deputy Speaker: That is all with respect to Bihar ?
Dr. Ambedkar: Yes.
* P. D., Vol. 16, Part II, 11th October 1951, pp. 4617-20.
PDF page 814 (printed page 795)
795PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES
Mr. Deputy Speaker: I shall put it to the House. Any
other hon. Members wanting to speak ?
Shri Syamnandan Sahaya (Bihar): Before we accept
the Bihar order, will the Hon. Minister kindly state what
are the actual changes that he is accepting?
Mr. Deputy Speaker: There are no changes made. The
amendment as a whole is accepted. I shall read it.
Shri Syamnandan Sahaya: Because there stand in
the name of Mr. Kshudiram Mahata several amendments.
Therefore we would like to know exactly.
Dr. Ambedkar: After accepting certain amendments
moved by the hon. Members, I thought that there might be
some point of order that might be raised against them in view
of the fact that in certain cases there were amendments to
propositions which did not exist at all. Therefore, I thought
it much better to take upon myself the responsibility of
moving these amendments so that there may be no point
of order arising.
Shri Syamnandan Sahaya: I am not raising any point of
order. I only wished to understand the particular amendment
of Mr. Mahata which was being accepted. If you will kindly
read out or if the Hon. Minister will explain, we will know
what exactly the position is.
Dr. Ambedkar: The position is this.
Mr. Deputy Speaker: May I suggest one thing ? I
shall allow the Hon. Law Minister to move the amendment
which he accepts. Thereafter, I shall consider the other
amendments. If they are barred, they will be barred. If
any other hon. Member wants to move any amendments
which are not barred, the House will consider them. The
amendments have already been moved. If they want to
speak, they may speak.
Dr. Ambedkar: The amendments moved by Sheikh
Mohiuddin and Shri Kshudiram Mahata deal with the
spliting up of the Graduates Constituency for the Council of
PDF page 815 (printed page 796)
796 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
States. Originally, in the Order issued by the President, the
grouping was done in a different manner. The Members of
the Committee which I had invited mentioned that the Order
proposed by Sheikh Mohiuddin and Mr. Mahata should be
adopted; in other words, there should be a separate division
for Patna, a separate division for Tirhut, and separate division
for Bhagalpur and a separate division for Chota Nagpur.
On the whole I thought that there was some substance in
the arguments presented by these two Members who had
taken upon themselves the responsibility to move these
amendments. The same has been done with regard to the
Teachers Constituencies for the Council of States. In other
words, Bihar has been divided into four divisions. Patna,
Tirhut, Bhagalpur and Chota Nagpur. So far as I could
understand the sense of the Bihar Members who were present
at that meeting the sense was unanimous in favour of the
arrangement proposed by this amendment.
Mr. Deputy Speaker: He has only done this. Instead
of the entire state being a single constituency for Graduate
in Bihar, it has now been divided into four constituencies,
under this amendment.
Dr. Ambedkar: Both for Graduates and Teachers.
Deputy Speaker: In the Order of the President, Graduates
alone is noted.
Dr. Ambedkar: If you will kindly refer to list 4, Bihar,
you will see......
Mr. Deputy Speaker: I am putting the Teachers
Constituency later. Hon. Members will refer to the
Delimitation of Council of States Constituencies Order. In the
Table. Bihar, Graduates is the earliest entry. The following
is the amendment. In the place of the ‘Entire State’ as the
Graduates Constituency in the second column, the hon.
Member has given notice of his amendment that the entire
State may be divided into four subdivisions for the purpose
of elections. I shall put that to the House and then I shall
come to Teachers later.