Vol. 15 · pages 926–930
As Free India's First Law Minister and Member of Opposition in Parliament, 1947–1956
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 926 (printed page 907)
907PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES
results depends upon who are the people who are charged with
the duties of executing that policy. If the executive authority
is unsympathetic, is antagonistic, that policy, however good
it may be, can never fructify. And let me add, that so far as
my experience goes, the whole of the administration which
is now composed of caste Hindus, is the most unsympathetic
administration that the scheduled castes have to suffer
under. This is because of the unsympathetic character of
the administration. And when we have been shouting for
representation in services, that claim is being maligned by
calling it communalism. What we are trying to do is to reduce
the communalism of the other people. We are not asking for
communalism. I hope my hon. friend will remember this. Until
and unless your administration and your executive becomes
more sympathetic to the scheduled castes, none of your laws
and none, of your administrative policies will bear any fruit.
Then let us come to, what are called, the Central Services.
Here I am taking only the figures of permanent posts, not
the temporary ones, as they stood on 1st December, 1952.
The Commissioner says that the Ministry of Railways, the
Ministry of Communications, the Ministry of Finance, the
Ministry of Information and other organisations under its
control have not supplied information on this point. Therefore,
these figures relate to those departments which have supplied
the information.
The figures are very telling. In class I the actual strength
is 752 and the scheduled castes number 10; according to the
proportion fixed by the Home Ministry that ought to have
been 175. Class II (gazetted posts) total number is 642 while
the scheduled castes number only seven; that ought to have
been 107 according to the proportion; class I (non-gazetted)
total number is 1123 and the scheduled castes number 44;
that ought to have been 185. Class III total number is 10,372
and the scheduled castes number 536 and this ought to have
been 728. In class IV, the total number is 8807.
Dr. P. C. Mitra (Bihar) : How many of them applied ?
Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : The scheduled castes number 1251
but ought to have been 1478. Class IV servants, I think, are
PDF page 927 (printed page 908)
908 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
chaprasis and there you find the number of scheduled castes
people fairly large. There are the figures which must be
within the ken of the Home Ministry. They have laid down
a proportion and surely, it is their duty to see that that
proportion is carried out by the different Ministeries. Why
has there been this defalcation on the part of the various
Ministeries and why has the Home Minister not taken any
action ? If he had taken any action, what is the action that
he took in order that the scheduled castes receive their quota
which is fixed by him ? Sir, it is a very black picture, if I
may say so, very black. It reminds me of a cartoon which
was drawn by the Germans during the last War. The cartoon
depicted an old negro gentleman in Washington. When war
was declared, the negro—as everybody knows, negroes are
not well disposed towards the whites in America; they are
always very angry, quarrelling with them for not giving them
equality of opportunity—suddenly felt very patriotic and he
said that he must transfer some of his patriotism to the young
boy who was his son. He went to the market and purchased
an American National Flag—small one which the boy could
hold—and gave it to the boy. He said, “My son, I want to
show you today our capital, our capital”. The boy did not
realise what it meant. Holding the boy by the right hand—
and the boy holding the flag in his left hand—the old man
took him round and round in Washington City, showed him
the Supreme Court, the Congress House, the Senate and so
on and so on and ultimately, after lunch, came down to the
White House, stood there for a minute or two, and said to the
young boy, “My dear boy, this is the House of our President”.
But the boy said, “Father, what are you talking ? He is a
white man and how do you praise him ?” The old man said,
“Oh, shut up, that is only outward”. That is to say, inside
he is quite black. I think that might well be applied to the
Home Minister; notwithstanding the white dress, he is very
black inside and the evidence is the neglect which has been
shown in the matter of seeing that the Home Ministry’s own
orders are carried out. Nothing has been done.
I have dealt with services and I will deal now with the
question of propaganda. I see that the Government of India
PDF page 928 (printed page 909)
909PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES
has sanctioned about Rs. 50 lakhs for the year 1953-54 for the
purposes of carrying on propaganda against untouchability.
The scheme, I understand, is that a part of the money is
given to private agencies choosen by the State Governments
and part of the money is given to all-India or Organisations
directly by the Government of India. That is the scheme. I
have no idea what my hon. friend means by the abolition of
untouchability. What is untouchability ? Let us understand
it very carefully. Untouchability, so far as I understand it, is
a kind of a mental disease of the Hindus. It is not a disease
from which I am suffering, not any tumour which I have
got, not a rheumatic pain or any of the physical disabilities
which can be removed but it is a mental twist; every Hindu
believes that to observe untouchability is the right thing. I do
not understand how my friend is going to untwist the twist
which the Hindus have got for thousands of years; unless
they are all sent to some kind of a mental hospital, it is very
difficult to cure them and I do not want them to be sent there.
Therefore, let us understand what we talk and what we are
doing. Besides, all must realise that untouchability is founded
on religion. There is no doubt about it and let us not be
ashamed of realising it. Manu, in his law book, very difinitely
prescribes untouchability. He said that the untouchables shall
live outside the village, that they shall have only earthen pots,
that they shall not have clean clothes, that they shall beg
for their food and so on and I canot see how you blame the
Hindus. For thousands of years, by the teaching of this dirty
law. they have got inculcated in their mind the doctrine that
untouchability is a most sacred thing. The Hindu has been
taught that the most pious and best of life is that of a rat
who lives in a hole, unconnected with anyone, he must not
touch this, he must not touch that, he must not eat this, he
must not eat that, etc. and this is a kind of life which a rat
observes by living in a hole. A rat would not allow another
rat to come into its own house. That is the position and all
that we can do is to see that untouchability which, as I said,
is a mental twist of the Hindus does not protrude so much
into public life as to involve the civil liberties of the people.
PDF page 929 (printed page 910)
910 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
Dr. P. C. Mitra: Untouchability is only a custom and usage.
Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : If you want to study that subject
with me, I can spend a few hours with you.
Therefore, Sir, this propaganda business is quite impossible
for me to understand. I agree with my hon. friend Mr. Kunzru
that it may result in nothing else but a waste of public money.
Secondly, I do not undersand why this matter should be
left to these what are called organisations of social workers.
A social worker in this country is a professional, he has no
such things as inner sympathy. He is a professional. If the
Muslim league wants him, he will probably serve the Muslim
League; if the Hindu Mahasabha wants him, he will serve the
Hindu Mahasabha; if the Congress wants him, he will serve
the Congress. He is a professional and there is no such thing
as, for instance, an inner love. As Tolstoy has said— rightly
said—before you serve, you must learn to love., No man can
serve anybody unless he loves him. These professionals have
no love; they are simply trying to make their livelihood and
therefore, perhaps, I would not be suprised if they are getting
remuneration from all the three. I do not wish to comment
on it. The proper thing, if my hon. friend wants to do, seems
to me to be to take hold of these unemployed graduates.
There are plenty of them, intelligent educated boys, who can
be said to have some kind of modern outlook in life or who
might be said to have developed some public conscience in
the matter. You employ them on some reasonable salary, give
them a motor-bike or a cycle and give each man seven, ten
or fifteen villages, an ask him to go round village by village,
hold public meetings, address the people on the question of
untouchability and tell them that this is something which
is going to bring disgrace upon this country in the modern
world. That way it would be far more fruitful and far more
effective than the kind of thing that my hon. frined is
doing. Why these social organisations have a fascination for
the Congress Government, I do not know. In olden times,
during the British regime, the Centre acted administratively
through the Collector. Money was given to him and he was
PDF page 930 (printed page 911)
911PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES
asked to discharge certain functions in certain fields. He could
be held accountable to the Government. Money was safe in his
hands. If you do not like the Collector then employ the kind of
agency that I have submitted, namely, a group of intelligent
boys who would be longing to do this service. This kind of a
thing, a motley crowd, calling itself by some kind of a name
to attract people is of no consequence at all.
Then , Sir, ………..
Shri K. B. Lall (Bihar) : Will they not be professional ?
Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : The Government servant is not a
professional. Why ? You want to use them later for canvassing
votes for you in the elections. That is the whole trouble about it.
Now, Sir, regarding the other point, namely, selection of
certain agencies by the Government of India and giving them
funds to do this propaganda work, the Commissioner has
made some observations on some communication that passed
betwen me and the Home Department. He has said that other
agencies have accepted the offer of the Government to receive
money and to do propaganda. I was one naughty boy who
refused and he thought that it might be well in bringing this
default on my part to public notice. I wish he had given him
the full letter which I had written to the Home Department.
I think Mr. Datar dealt with the matter if I mistake not, and
he will recall that what I said was this that the bodies that
were chosen by the Government of India, were political parties
like the Harijan League and some other League, something
like that, were all political bodies. The Federation was also
a political body. So I thnk it was wrong for Government to
hand over public funds to political bodies who may use the
funds for political propaganda and not for the elevation of
the Scheduled Castes, and I told him that there was the
Chairman of another body which was being built up in Bombay,
which was a purely social welfare body. It had large funds,
somewhere between two and three lakhs of rupees. They
were going to build a hall and carry on activity. Of course
I forgot to mention therein that that body, although it was
formed in Bombay, was not confined in the matter of its social