Vol. 15 · pages 991–995
As Free India's First Law Minister and Member of Opposition in Parliament, 1947–1956
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 991 (printed page 972)
972 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
Hyderabad should be made the second capital of India. You
can have your Delhi and for some seasons it may be good. But
you must have a capital in Southern India, where people may
feel that their Government is nearer to them. I suggested at
one time that Hyderabad should be made the second capital
of india. It is one of the most beautiful towns that I have ever
seen in India. It has got all the necessities and amenities which
a capital may require. All that may be necessary would be to
have a sort of Legislative Assembly and Council of State. If
that is done, then the people in the South with whom I have
had many talks, would feel that their Government is nearer,
that it is not so far away as Delhi. Delhi to the Southern
people is a kind of a foreign territory. It is hot and they do
not want to stay for long. I hope my hon. friend will take
these points into consideration.
Sir, I am not in a condition to speak very long, nor have I
got many other points to urge. But there is one thing that I
would like to say. I had hoped that this Report of the S.R.C.†
would have been placed before, not merely the party people,
but generally before all, and they should have obtained the
common advice of all the citizens of India and should have
given effect to their decision. Sir, it was my hope that what
we would settle now, we would settle for ever, because it is
a very foolish thing for a gardener to plant a tree today and
to uproot it tomorrow, to see whether it has taken root. That
way the plant will never live. I cannot help reminding my
hon. friend of the statement of Tom Paine that whatever is
wrongly. settled is never permanently settled; it has to be
resettled. If you are going to settle these things with the help
of your party, remember that your party is not perpetual.
You can seethe signs of waning even now before your eyes.
If whatever you do you do without the consent of the
Opposition, I have not the least doubt about it that when
the Opposition would come into power, they would uproot the
thing and replant it. Such a thing would be most dangerous
for us. Sir, I have done.
† State Reorganisation Committee.
PDF page 992 (printed page 973)
973PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES
Shri C. P. Parikh (Bombay): The hon. Member made an
incorrect statement when he said that Shri Morarji said at
any time categorically that Bombay belongs to Maharashstra.
I think the hon. Member should make such statement with
a sense of responsibility.
Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: It is in the ‘Times of India’.
*LEAVE OF ABSENCE TO DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR
Mr. Deputy Chairman: I have to inform the hon.
Members that the following letter has been received from
Dr. B. R. Ambedkar.
“I came to Bombay for treatment and had hoped to be able
to return to Delhi in time. Unfortunately, I have not recovered.
I am therefores, unable to attend and apply to you for leave
of absence. I hope the Rajya Sabha will grant my request.”
Is it the pleasure of the House that permission be granted
to Dr. B. R. Ambedkar for remaining absent from meetings
of the House from 29th March 1955, till the end of the Ninth
Session and from all meetings of the House during the current
Session ?
(No hon. Member dissented. )
Permission to remain absent is granted.
* P. D., Vol. 10-C, 1st October 1955, pp. 5529-30.
PDF page 993 (printed page 974)
974 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
(55)
*OBITUARY REFERENCE—DEMISE OF
DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR
The Prime Minister (Shri Jawaharlal Nehru):
Mr. Deputy Chairman, I deeply regret to inform the House
that a Member of this House who had played a very leading
part in many matters passed away a short while ago. I refer
to Dr. Ambedkar. Dr. Ambedkar for many, many years had
been a very controversial figure in Indian public affairs, but
there can be no doubt about his outstanding quality, his
scholarship, and the intensity with which he pursued his
convictions, sometimes rather with greater intensity than
perhaps required by the particular subject, which sometimes
reacted in a contrary way. But he was the symbol of that
intense feeling which we must always remember, the intense
feeling of the supressed classes in India who have suffered for
ages past under our previous social systems, and it is as well
that we recognise this bidden that all of us should carry and
should always remember, It may be that some of us thought,
as I have just said, that he overdid the expression of that
feeling, but I do not think that, apart from the manner of
utterance or language, anybody should challenge the rightness
of the inetnsity of his feeling in that matter which should be
felt by all of us and perhaps even more so by those who have
not in themselves or in their groups or classes had to suffer
from that. He was that. Therefore he became this symbol.
But we in Parliament remember him for many other things
and more particularly for the very prominent part he played
in the making of our Conbstitution, and perhaps that fact
will be remembered even longer than his other activities. I
am quite sure that every Member of this House will want
* P. D., Vol. 10-C, 6th December 1956, pp. 1769-70.
PDF page 994 (printed page 975)
975PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES
us to send our deep condolences and message of sympathy
to his family and to express our deep sorrow at his demise.
It is the custom of this House. I believe, Sir, that when
a Member dies in Delhi, the House adjourns for the rest of
the day. I leave it to you, Sir, and to the House, but I would
suggest that it is right and proper for us to follow that custom.
Mr. Deputy Chairman : I would like to associate myself
with the sentiments expressed by the Prime Minister. I am
sure every Member of this House shares the same sentiments.
We have all heard with profound sorrow and a sense of
shock of the sudden death of Dr. Ambedkar. He was present
in the House only the day before yesterday and was in his
usual mood, talking and joking with his friends. Many may
not agree with him and his political philosophy but he was
one of our prominent Members and he was always listened
to with respect. His speeches were marked by scholarship,
erudition and deep study. He will, however, be remembered
as one of the great architects of our Constitution. He was
also very anxious to see that the Hindu Law was enacted and
most of it has been enacted. It is a great loss to this House
Particularly, and, as a mark of respect, I request the House
to stand up for two minutes.
(The House stood in silence for two minutes. )
Mr. Deputy Chairman: The House stands adjourned till
11-00 A.M. tomorrow.
The House then adjourned at fifty three minutes past
eleven of the clock till eleven of the clock on Friday, the 7th
December 1956.
zz
PDF page 995 (printed page 976)
976 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
LOK SABHA
Thursday, 6th December, 1956
The Lok Sabha met at Eleven of the Clock
12-00 hrs.
DEATH OF DR. AMBEDKAR
*The Prime Minister and Leader of the House (Shri
Jawaharlal Nehru): Mr. Speaker, Sir, I have to convey to
the House the sad news of the death of Dr. Ambedkar. Only
two days ago, I believe, the day before yesterday, he was
present in the other House of which he was a Member. The
news, therefore, of his death today came as a shock to all of
us who had no inkling of such a thing happening so soon.
Dr. Ambedkar, as every Member of this House knows,
played a very important part in the making of the Constitution
of India, subsequently in the Legislative Part of the Constituent
Assembly and later in the Provisional Parliament. After that,
he was not a Member of Parliament for some time. Then,
he came back to the Rajya Sabha of which he was a sitting
Member.
He is often spoken of as one of the architects of our
Constitution. There is no doubt that no one took greater care
and trouble over Constitution making than Dr. Ambedkar. He
will be remembered also for the great interest he took and
the trouble he took over the question of Hindu Law reform.
I am happy that he saw that reform in a very large measure
carried out, perhaps not in the form of that monumental
tome that he had himself drafted, but in separate bits.
But, I imagine that the way he will be remembered most
* P. D., Vol. 10, Part II, 6th December 1956, pp. 2059-68.