Vol. 17, Part I · pages 186–190
Dr. B. R. Ambedkar and His Egalitarian Revolution — Struggle for Human Rights
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 186 (printed page 161)
161ROLE OF ......................... INDIAN DEMOCRACY
Hindus. But if you insist on postponing the referendum further,
I would begin to suspect that what you want is not to test the
bona fides of the Caste Hindus but time only to organize the
Depressed Classes for an adverse referendum.” He made an
impassioned appeal for mutual trust, confidence, and goodwill.
He described how from the age of twelve, his whole being had
rebelled against the very idea of regarding any fellow human
being Untouchable and how since then he had led a ceaseless
crusade against the evil. “You have a perfect right to demand
cent per cent security by the statutory safeguards,” he told
Dr. Ambedkar, “But, from my fiery bed, I beg of you not to
insist upon the right. I am here to-day to ask for a reprieve
for my Caste Hindu brethren. Thank God, their conscience
has been roused. If you proceed to wrest from them cent per
cent security by the statutory means, then it will interrupt
the process of heart-cleansing and self-purification that is
fast taking place among them. The particular injustice, for a
while, to the Untouchables might be checked, but the taint
in Hinduism would remain. After all, Untouchability is but a
symptom of that deep-seated taint. And, if Hinduism is not
completely purged of it, it will assert itself again and again
in various ways and continue to poison our entire social
and political fabric. I entreat you, therefore, not to deprive
Hinduism of a last chance to make a voluntary expiation for
its sinful past. Give me the chance of working among the
Caste Hindus. That is but fair. If you ask for ten or fifteen
years, then it is no chance at all. Hindus must give a good
account of themselves within five years or not at all. For me,
therefore, the five-year limit of referendum is an absolute
matter of conscience. There should be a referendum, but not
at the end of any period longer than five years. Tell your
friends that I am adamant on this point. I may be a despicable
person, but when truth speaks through me I am invincible.
“(Epic Fast, Pp. 211—212).” 1
“The interview ended, and leaders started to settle other
details regarding the number of men in the panel, number
of total seats in the Provincial Assemblies, duration of the
primary system, duration of reserved seats and distribution
of posts.” “This meeting took place at the residence of Raja
Bahadur Shivlal Motilal.”
1: Reprinted. Khairmode, Vol. 5, Pp. 47-48.
PDF page 187 (printed page 162)
162 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
“It was now four in the evening. News came in that
Gandhi’s health had taken a serious turn, and he was
fast losing strength. Gandhi’s son, Devdas Gandhi, with
tears in his eyes, described the condition of his father to
Dr. Ambedkar and entreated him not to hold over the
agreement by pressing for a referendum. At last it was
decided to refer this matter to Gandhi. Ambedkar with
selected leaders saw Gandhi in the jail at nine o’clock that
night. Gandhi approved of the idea of referendum, but said
it should take place after five years. Gandhi’s voice had
now sunk to a whisper. The Jail Doctors intervened and
stopped further conversation. The leaves of the mango tree
above refused to move. It was a breathless silence. The
visitors had to return. Dr. Ambedkar was not prepared to
give up his point. His will-power was on the strain. Letters
threatening his life came in showers.” 1
Here is one such letter :
“Dr. Ambedkar,
If you do not accept to Mahatma Gandhi’s demand
within four days, your life will be in danger. If you want
to save your life, you should accept Gandhiji’s demand and
help ending his fast immediately. This is a warning to you.
If you do not give up your vehemence, you will be killed.”
Signed by Haribhai K. Bhat,
A member and worker of BPEE” 2
Murderous looks were cast at him in the street, and
some of the leaders insanely reviled him behind his back.”
Further, a secret plan to kill Dr. Ambedkar by some
youth from touchable classes of Poona was reported by
‘Janata’ (24-9-32, P. 8), thus:
“Dr. Ambedkar’s life in danger !
Secret Meeting of Poona students Murder threat”
Poona, Dt. 23-9-32, 8 P. M.
1:Keer,P.213.
2: Janata, dated 1st October 1932.
PDF page 188 (printed page 163)
163ROLE OF ......................... INDIAN DEMOCRACY
(By Special Reporter of Janata)
“Two days are over. Negotiations are continuously going
on. Various experiments of pressurising Dr. Ambedkar are
going on. The students following the Gogate cult which had
shot at the Governor, are known to be secretly planning.
It is also being said that if Dr. Ambedkar is removed from
the scene, things would settle and Gandhiji’s life would
be saved. When Dr. Ambedkar was informed of this, he
laughed at it. Probably his fearless laugh indicated that
he was not afraid of such a death. However, the local
Untouchable community is worried about the safety of
Dr. Ambedkar and they are keeping an alert. Even if there
happens a slightest injury to Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar,
there would be a grave situation. Thousands of Untouchable
youth would be ready to make any sacrifice for him. All are
feeling a concern that there should not be such a violent
end to Gandhiji’s oath.” 1
“The leaders who went to see Mahatmaji at 9-30 p.m.
came out after a comparatively short while looking
exhausted but cheerful. Dr. Ambedkar was heard to remark
“Gandhiji is on my side.”
“The leaders are meeting again in conference at 8
o’clock on Saturday morning and will see Gandhiji shortly
afterwards. Prevalent opinion is that complete agreement
is now within reach. And unless a miraculous piece of illluck intervenes, Saturday noon must enable Poona to flash
out the happy news of a difinite settlement.
Differences on questions of major importance have
almost been surmounted and have been reduced to
an almost theoretical difference on the question of a
referendum of the Depressed Classes at a distant future
date. It is considered likely that the leaders may agree to
a referendum to be taken after 10 years.
1: Janata, dated 24th September 1932.
PDF page 189 (printed page 164)
164 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
Among the points agreed upon are stated to be the
following :—
1. A panel of 4 for election to each seat.
2. A single vote.
3. The total number of seats in all Provincial Councils to
be reserved for Depressed Classes would be between 150 to
155 as against 71 allowed by the Communal Award.
The Conference, which had met at Pandit Malaviya’s
place, early in the morning, after a non-stop sitting of over
thirteen hours, came to an end at 9-30 p. m., after which
Pandit Malaviya, Sjt. C. Rajagopalachari, Mr. Jayakar,
Dr. Sapru, Dr. Ambedkar and others left hurriedly for
Yeravda jail.
The Conference attracted anxious crowds at Malaviyaji’s
place. Even when the leaders rose at 9-30 p. m., no hope of
settlement to-night was entertained.
Leaders are racing against time, and lunch after dinner
today went side by side with discussions.
While they looked serious and absorbed earlier, boisterous
laughter was heard emanating from behind the walls in the
evening.
The Conference of caste Hindus and Depressed Class
Leaders commenced at 9 o’clock this morning at Malaviya’s
residence behind closed doors. The Conference, it is
understood, covered much ground and came to a settlement
on questions of panel for election, and basis of representation
except in the United Provinces, though the final word on the
matter is still unsaid.
Regarding panels, it is stated that a panel of four has
been fixed as against Dr. Ambedkar’s understood demand
for two and Gandhiji’s suggestion for five.
To anxious queries by pressmen late in the evening,
Dr. Sapru replied : “discussions are so far satisfactory, and
we propose to sit through it even in the night.”
PDF page 190 (printed page 165)
165ROLE OF ......................... INDIAN DEMOCRACY
Dr. Ambedkar after the Conference stated :—
“The situation is hopeful. Differences of crucial character
are few, and there are chances of agreement. Gandhiji is
feeling weak owing to the fast but carried on the conversation
with us for over fifteen minutes.” 1
“On Saturday morning discussions were resumed.
The question of the total number of seats was decided
by granting 148 seats to the Depressed Classes in the
Provincial Assemblies, and it was also decided that 10 per
cent of the seats of the Hindus from British India in the
Central Assembly should be given to the Depressed Classes.
And then discussion was held for hours on the question of
referendum which baffled the solution as before. As nobody
would agree to Dr. Ambedkar’s demand, he thought it proper
to see Gandhi once again in the matter. So, accompanied by
Dr. Solanki and Rajagopalachari, he went to Gandhi. Gandhi
told Ambedkar that his logic was irrefutable; but he said
mere statutory guarantee would not root out the disease.
He, therefore, entreated Ambedkar to give a last chance to
Hinduism to make a voluntary expiation for its sinful past
and added that there should be a referendum but not at the
end of any period longer than five years. “Five years or my
life,” said Gandhi with a tone of finality.
Returning to the place of discussion, Dr. Ambedkar said
that he was not prepared to yield on the point of the period
of referendum which should be, he averred, not less than
ten years. After an hour or so they decided to make the
agreement without the condition of referendum attached
to it ! Rajagopalachari explained it to Gandhi in the jail at
three in the afternoon. Gandhi said it was excellent and
gave his consent. Rajagopalachari returned posthaste to 1,
Ramkrishna Bhandarkar Road, Shivlal Motilal’s Bungalow,
and amidst rejoicings announced that Gandhi had blessed
the agreement. It took them no time to draft the agreement.
Amidst an atmosphere of joviality, freshness and chat, the
agreement was signed at five in the evening on Saturday, 24th
September, and it went down to history as the Poona Pact.
1: The Free Press Journal, dated 24th September 1932.