Vol. 17, Part II · pages 551–555
Dr. B. R. Ambedkar and His Egalitarian Revolution — Socio-political and Religious Activities
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 551 (printed page 526)
526 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
Mr. Butler added, “I welcome the Government’s last
statement and in particular the last part of it that it is not
contemplated that any constitution will be forced on unwilling
parts of country. I should, however, like clarification on one or
two points. The statement refers to a large section of Indian
population inhabiting parts of the country. These words are
new to those of us who are versed in Indian affairs. Sir Stafford
Cripps speaking in the debate used a rather different language,
which I maintain is too narrow in its terms and there may
be confusion in India if this matter is not cleard up.
“Sir Stafford Cripps said that if the Muslim League cannot
be persuaded to come into the Constituent Assembly then
parts of the country where they are in a majority cannot be
held to be bound by the result, I do not think the Government
ought to confine themselves solely to the Muslim League. It
is much fairer to use the expression Muslims as a whole and
I hope that the Minister replying today will confirm that the
original sense prevails and that communities and elements are
in question and not simply a League, a party of representative
of a community.”
Mr. Butler said, the Opposition was not thinking only of
the Muslim community, but other minorities whose case had
been put in Parliament and would be put again.
“In order that Britain’s mission should be well, honourably
and successfully discharged it seemed to be essential that
a proper understanding should be established between
Parliament and the Indian people. There was every reason
why all points of view should be put clearly round the table
and no facts left unfaced.
Mr. Buttler said that no section of Sir Stafford Cripps
speech had been less convincing and more reprehensible
than his skating over the manner in which Scheduled Castes
representation had been introduced into the Assembly. He
had never been able to understand the facile acceptance by
the labour movement of the position in which the interests of
poorest and most under-privileged section in India had been
neglected and sold to their long-time oppressors and he was
astonished that the Prime Minister had been able to lend
himself to this bargain. The Government ought never to have
accepted this positions.
PDF page 552 (printed page 527)
527UNDER-PRIVILIGED . . . . . . . . . OPPRESSORS
Mr. Alexander (intervening):—Does Mr. Butler realise that
in the provincial elections there was a very large proportion
of Independent Scheduled Castes elected apart from other two
categories he mentions and secondly, that we had to act in
the way we did to deal with an urgent situation ?
Mr. Alexander continued, “Franchise is not merely the
Poona Pact, but what the Government of 1935 put in the
1935 Act.
“Thirdly, would he suggest that we should go into an
entirely new basis of new franchise and India wide compilation
of new register and put off for a long time a possible new
settlement ? Shall we not face those facts now ?”
SCHEDULED CASTES’ REPRESENTATION
Mr. Butler: The first point about Independent members is
certainly correct. From all opinions I have been able to gather
in investigating this point, there is no doubt that the Scheduled
Castes have been so terrorised by Congress discipline that
many of them have decided to stand as Independents rather
than take the label of the Congress.
Mr. Butler said that he did not think it right that the
Scheduled Castes should be represented in the Assembly
by representatives of the Congress. The Government were
reposing most of their confidence for obtaining justice for the
minorities on the Advisory Committee and he asked if the
Committee’s decisions about minorities would be embodied
in the Constitution.
If a spirit of compromise and give and take was absent
in India, the Government would be faced with a very serious
situation but he trusted that if there was a breakdown, the
Government would give a further lead. If a new initiative
proved necessary, it would have to be towards simplification
of the scheme and a clearer acknowledgment of British
responsibilities in the period before a successful issue of the
negotiations, there was still a chance of orderly solution, but
it depended upon how determined the Government was and
would be and how clearly it saw the dangers of the situation.
“We cannot, at the moment, shuffle off our obligations. They
remain and upon their adequate discharge, depends the future
happiness of the Indian people,” Mr. Butler concluded.
PDF page 553 (printed page 528)
528 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
MR. ALEXANDER’S REPLY TO DEBATE
Mr. A. V. Alexander, Minister designate of Defence, replying to
the debate, said, it was taking place in the most crucial hour in the
history of India and its people, as well as the British Commonwealth.
He asked responsible leaders of all parties in India to take note that
the great majority of the speakers in the debate desired nothing
more than that India should achieve her freedom on the basis of
the good-will and co-operation of all concerned.
Replying to Mr. Churchill’s question whether it was the
Government’s policy for the Depressed Classes to be treated as a
separate political entity, Mr. Alexander said that in the Act of 1935
the Depressed Classes were treated as a separate political entity and
whether or not any separation of that kind should be given to them
in the new Assembly was a matter for the Constituent Assembly.
The Government, he declared, did not consider it desirable or in
the interests of the Depressed Classes that they should attempt to
influence the Assembly in that matter. Their view was that provisions
in the Constitution were the right methods for providing safeguards
over the rights of minority elements.
He reminded the House of what the Cabinet Mission said
namely that when the Constituent Assembly completed their
labours the British Government would recommend to Parliament
to take necessary action to enable the new Constitution to come
into operation subject to two matters. One of them was adequate
provision for the protection of minorities. Both the major parties had
declared their intention of making proper provision for protection in
the Constitution and the Government saw no reason to doubt that
the Constituent Assembly would do so.
Mr. Alexander said that he agreed with Mr. Hugh Molson
(Conservative) that it was the Government’s intention that protection
of minorities must be provided for in the Constitution. He added :
“I understand that Dr. Ambedkar argued strongly for that during
the Cripps Mission. In the last paragraph of our statement last
week we made it clear we would not contemplate forcing upon an
unwilling community anything they did not want. The Congress itself
accepts that. In our statement of May 25 we have agreed to leave
Constitution making to Indians provided we get proper protection
for minorities. We want that in the Constitution. We shall adhere
to our pledges to the Indian people.”1
zz
1. : Jai Bheem, dated 1st January 1947.
PDF page 554
APPENDIX—VIII
SECRET 1934/34 S. B.
Memo No.
39-Bihar-37*
THE BIHAR PROVINCIAL
DEPRESSED CLASSES LEAGUE
It is learnt confidentially that Jagjiwan Ram, B. Sc.
President, Bihar Prov. Depressed Classes League, Patna has
sent a letter, dated 8th March 1937 to Dr. B. R. Ambedkar,
Bar-at-Law, Rajgraha, Dadar, Bombay. The contents of which
are given below :—
“UNITE AND ORGANISE”
Bankipur, Patna, the 8th March 1937.
No. 41
My dear Doctor Saheb,
I have your kind letter of the 3rd instant. If your brochure
on caste has run out, kindly send one copy of it so that I
may commence its translation.
As desired by you, I am sending a list of candidates who
contested the election. I must admit that we made a pact
with the Congress and as a result of the pact 9 persons
of the League have been returned. They have signed the
League pledge and also the Congress pledge with certain
reservations. Perhaps you know that here in Bihar there
is no organised party except the Congress. The minister of
Local Self-Government i.e. Sir Ganesh Dutt Singh was trying
to have his party but he could not organise it. We made the
pact with the Congress at the eleventh hour i.e. on the 29th
October 1936 and the nomination papers were to be filed by
the 3rd November 1936. We the Depressed Classes have begun
our movement very late here and have got little organisation.
But the experience we have gained in the recent election
goes to show that if we carry on our work for the coming
* BIHAR C I. DEPARTMENT S PECIAL B RANCH, Patna, dated the 10 March
1937. Copy of a Special Officer’s report, dated 9th March 1937.
PDF page 555 (printed page 530)
530 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
5 years, we can very well contest independently in the next
election and with success.
You know Mr. Baldeo Prasad Jaiswal of Allahabad. He
has come to Patna and wants to hold an All-India conference.
Here it has been given in papers by him that the conference
will be presided over by Diwan Bahadur Srinivasan and that
you will attend the conference. I do not know the truth nor
can I believe the man. Last year a conference was held at
Lucknow and Mr. Jaiswal was the moving figure in convening
the conference. I went all the way to Lucknow simply to see
you but was greatly disappointed. Now he is seeking my help
but openly I cannot help him and cannot give him any help
in any way unless I know that you will attend the conference.
This conference is to be held on the 9th, 10th and 11th April
1937. No person of Bihar is with him. He has his office located
in a Catholic Church here and everything is being manoeuvred
by missionaries.
The W. C. of the Depressed Classes League has decided to
call a Provincial conference at Patna between 15th April and
15th May 1937 and it has also decided to invite you. But in
case you are coming to attend the conference of Mr. Jaiswal,
which I doubt, we will fix the date of our conference near
about 12th April. Will you let me know as soon as you get
this letter whether you will attend the conference convened by
Mr. Jaiswal. One thing, he will not be able to have a gathering
of more than one hundred Depressed Classes. He can, of
course, invite thousands of Muhammamidans and Christians
as he did at Lucknow. I take strong objection of this method.
We should have genuine Depressed Classes conferences. Let
me hear from you very early.
With regards.
Yours sincerely,
(Sd.) JAGJIWAN RAM.