Vol. 17, Part III · pages 281–285
Dr. B. R. Ambedkar and His Egalitarian Revolution — Speeches
This text was extracted automatically from the official PDF of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, so it may contain small errors. Always check the original page before quoting.
PDF page 281 (printed page 252)
252 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
power. I have no doubt that is our only salvation, and that
without it we will perish. It is on this question that we must
concentrate all our attention. It is a question of life and death
for us. What are our prospects in the matter of capturing
political power ? It is better if I sum up the forces which
are helping us and the forces which are working against us.
With the knowledge of such forces, you will be better able
to frame your policy and forge your sanctions.
Let me begin by telling you what has been the key-note
of my politics. You may be familiar with it but it is well to
re-state it. My basis of my politics lies in the proposition that
the Untouchables are not a sub-head or a sub-section of the
Hindus, and that they are a separate and a distinct element
in the national life of India, as separate and distinct as the
Muslims and like the Muslims of India the Untouchables are
entitled to separate political rights as against the Hindus
of India. This is the key-note of my politics. No one will
misunderstand me or my politics if he bears that in mind.
Having stated the fundamental basis of my politics I will
proceed to sum up the forces working for and against our
claim for separate political rights. To begin with the Round
Table Conference, the Round Table Conference was a very
vast affair, and I do not wish to trouble you with all the
details of what took place there. I will confine myself to
what happened to the Untouchables. There was a contest
between me and Mr. Gandhi. Mr. Gandhi contested that
the Untouchables were a sub-section of the Hindus and
consequently if any political power was to devolve from the
hands of the British it should pass undivided into the hands
of the Hindus who could be trusted to look after the interests
of the Untouchables. The position taken up by me was
totally different; I contended that the Untouchables formed
separate and distinct element in the life of the country.
The Hindus who are their hereditary enemies could not be
trusted and far from using the political power for raising
the Untouchables the fear was that they would use it for
perpetuating their subjection, and it was, therefore, absolutely
necessary that there should be political partition between
the Untouchables and the Hindus so that the Untouchables
PDF page 282 (printed page 253)
253IF DEMOCRACY....................OUR DOOM
may get political power in their own hands to use it to
promote their welfare or to use it to save themselves against
the tyranny and oppression of the Hindus. I do not want
to dilate upon what the Mahatma or other Hindus did by
way of manoeuvring to defeat the claim. It is sufficient to
say that at the Round Table Conference the Untouchables
won and the Mahatma lost. The Communal Award was the
result of this contest. Its great virtue lies in the fact that
the Untouchables were recognised in the national life of
India and entitled to claim separate political rights. That
is the importance of the Communal Award.
Mr. Gandhi, at first, did not accept the Communal
Award. He started a fast unto death to compel the British
Government to unsettle a settled fact. He failed in the fast
as he failed at the Round Table Conference in defeating
the claim of the Untouchables to be treated as a distinct
element separate from the Hindus and entitled to separate
political recognition. In the Poona Pact which was the
result of his fast, he had to admit the main contention I
had put forth at the Round Table Conference.
In the first round, the victory had gone to the
Untouchables. Our position remained intact even after
the war had commenced and the Congress had come to
occupy a dominant position in Indian politics. Indeed, our
claim was reassured and sustained by the declaration of
the Viceroy made on the 8th August 1940 in which it
was made clear that the Muslims and the Untouchables
were distinct and separate elements in the National life
of India and that the British Government will not enforce
a constitution which has not the support of the Muslims
and the Depressed Classes.
I have spoken so far of the strength of our position. I
must now speak to you of the forces that tend to weaken
our position. One malignant factor which has been
working to weaken our position is Gandhi and Gandhism.
By signing the Poona Pact, I helped to save the life of
Mr. Gandhi. But Mr. Gandhi accepted the Poona Pact not
as a gentleman signing an agreement with the intention to
PDF page 283 (printed page 254)
254 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
honour his word but as a crafty person seeking to find a way out
of a difficulty. For, I want you to remember that Mr. Gandhi,
notwithstanding the Poona Pact which saved him from death,
never gave his true and honest consent to the principle
underlying the Poona Pact. He remained a determined
opponent of the claim of the Untouchables for a separate
political recognition and has ever since done everything
possible to oppose our claim and to undermine our position.
I want you to bear in mind that Mr. Gandhi is our greatest
opponent. I do not like to use the word enemy, though there
is enough justification for it. There are some among us who
are deluded by the artificiality of his phraseology. But, I must
warn you that you would be making the greatest mistake if
you forget to take note of the fact that among the adverse
forces which are weakening your side and against which you
have to concentrate your forces in winning your battle for
political freedom, the most formidable force is Mr. Gandhi.
The second factor which has weakened your position must
be ascribed to the change in the attitude of His Majesty’s
Government. Upto the declaration of 8th August 1940, His
Majesty’s Government’s view was that the Untouchables were
distinct and a separate element and that they constituted
so important an element that their consent was necessary
for any constitutional changes that may be desired. But in
the proposals of His Majesty’s Government which were sent
down with Strafford Cripps, His Majesty’s Government took
a complete volte-face. For, Sir Strafford Cripps proclaimed
without blush or without remorse that only the consent
of the Hindus and the Muslims was enough for giving
effect to the constitutional changes involved in the Cripps
proposals; that the consent of the Untouchables was not
necessary. In plain terms the Untouchables had ceased to
be regarded as an important element in the National life of
India. It passes one’s comprehension how 60 to 70 millions
of Untouchables have ceased to be an important element
within a few months. It is a complete somersault on the
part of His Majesty’s Government. It is a great betrayal of
the Untouchables. Whatever the reasons for this betrayal
and however strong may be your feelings at so unjust and
PDF page 284 (printed page 255)
255IF DEMOCRACY....................OUR DOOM
indecent an act on the part of His Majesty’s Government,
the fact must be recognized that this has been the greatest
breach in our war. There is a third circumstance of an adverse
character to which I think I must not fail to draw your attention.
There was a time when there was a solidarity of feeling
based on community of interest among the different minority
communities in India, among whom the Muslim Community
was a premier community. That solidarity is now gone. This
is principally due to the change in the vision of the Muslim
community brought about by the Muslim League. The Muslim
League when it was resuscitated by Mr. Jinnah after the 1937
election began with the ideology that the Musalmans were a
minority, and as a minority they needed the strength of other
minorities to support and sustain them. So firm was the faith
of the Muslim League in the scheme of mutual strength that
the Muslim League had taken up the cause of other minorities
and passed resolutions pledging its support to their claims and
had stood out not merely as an advocate of the Muslim cause
but as a champion of all the other minorities in India. This
attitude of the League has undoubtedly been of great help to the
Untouchables as the attitude of the Untouchables had always
been to the Muslims of India. But the League’s attitude has
undergone a complete change. The Muslim League ever since
the Resolution on Pakistan was passed has ceased to regard
the Muslims as a community. It holds that the Muslims are
a nation. That is not all. The Muslim League further believes
that it has nothing to do with the other communities, that
it has nothing to do with the Hindu community but it has
also nothing to do with other minority communities. The
Muslim League alignment is simple. It is an alignment of
Muslim as against all other Non-Muslim without distinction
or discrimination. This change in the attitude of the League
cannot but have serious consequences for the Untouchables.
It means that the Untouchables have lost an ally. But it may
mean more than the loss of an ally The Muslim League has
not only come to set up a new and a different alignment of
Muslims versus Non-Muslims, it has set up a new equation
of values. That equation is a simple equation. It says that
the Muslims, whatever their numbers, are just equal to the
Non-Muslims and therefore, in any political arrangement the
Muslims must get fifty per cent. To this equation no one can
PDF page 285 (printed page 256)
256 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
consent. Not only it is against arithmetic; it is also against
the interests of all non-Muslim including the Untouchables.
Having regard to these changes in the political standpoint of
the Muslim League the Untouchables may be said not only
to have lost an ally but also to have lost a friend. For, if the
League insists on fifty per cent representation in everything,
there can be no doubt that the Muslims and the Untouchables
will come in conflict.
I have, so far, given you an idea as to what was our
position in Indian politics and what forces have been working
to undermine that position. Let me now give you an idea of
what I think should be your political demands. It is very
necessary that you should formulate them in clear terms. It
will clarify the position. Our people will know what we stand
for. Our opponents will have notice of our demands.
In the first place, you must insist upon being recognised
as an independent and separate element in the national life
of India. The theory that they are only a sub-section of the
Hindus must be fought tooth and nail. Failure to get the
Untouchables recognized as a distinct element, separate from
the Hindus, will keep them submerged and lead to their
suppression and degradation. Next, you must ask for provision
being made in the constitution for a sum of money to be
set apart annually in the budget of every Province for the
education of the Untouchables. You must demand such a sum
not only for primary education but also for higher education.
Higher education is more important to us at this stage than
primary education. From the standpoint of leadership, from
the standpoint of filling in high administrative posts, higher
education is to the Untouchables a great necessity. Thirdly, you
should demand that a number of posts in the public services
shall be reserved for the Untouchables subject, of course, to
the rule of minimum qualification. This is very essential. We
suffer from bad administration and not from bad laws. The
administration is bad because it is in the hands of the Caste
Hindus, who carry their social prejudices into administration
and persistently deny to the Untouchables for one reason
or another the principle of equal benefit to which they are
entitled. Good laws can do you no good unless you have good